How cbse rewrote rules to favor coempt eduteck

Really brave of him for exposing CBSE

https://sarthaksidhant.com/coempt/

• The article accuses CBSE of changing a tender so Coempt Edu Teck could qualify for an On-Screen Marking contract.

• Coempt was linked to Globarena Technologies, which was involved in the 2019 Telangana Intermediate exam controversy.

• The article says CBSE weakened eligibility rules between earlier drafts and the final tender.

• CBSE allegedly changed blacklist rules from excluding firms blacklisted in the past to excluding only firms currently blacklisted.

• It claims CBSE removed or softened rules about poor past performance.

• It says CBSE reduced the software quality requirement from CMMI Level 5 to CMMI Level 3.

• The author argues CBSE changed project experience rules to help companies with many smaller projects, instead of requiring strong large-scale marking experience.

• The article claims CBSE weakened data center and security requirements, raising concerns about student data safety.

• A later corrigendum allegedly removed CBSE’s power to blacklist the vendor for repeated mistakes.

• The penalty system allegedly focused more on delays than marking or scanning accuracy.

• The main concern is that students’ marks and personal data may have been put at risk.

• The author wants CBSE to explain why these tender changes were made and whether the contract award was fair.

• Bottom line: the article alleges CBSE changed tender rules in ways that benefited Coempt despite red flags around the company’s past and technical capability.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ndtv.com/education/to-protect-students-future-education-minister-dharmendra-pradhan-defends-indian-air-forces-role-in-neet-re-exam-11563899/amp/1

Is this dude and indiot. Paper wasn't leaked during transit but by the people who had direct access to it. How is this going to help? This is abusing public trust on the army and manipulation of public. Plus awfully sounds like the politics our neighbours play.

Originally posted by: Sanskruthi

Really brave of him for exposing CBSE

https://sarthaksidhant.com/coempt/

• The article accuses CBSE of changing a tender so Coempt Edu Teck could qualify for an On-Screen Marking contract.

• Coempt was linked to Globarena Technologies, which was involved in the 2019 Telangana Intermediate exam controversy.

• The article says CBSE weakened eligibility rules between earlier drafts and the final tender.

• CBSE allegedly changed blacklist rules from excluding firms blacklisted in the past to excluding only firms currently blacklisted.

• It claims CBSE removed or softened rules about poor past performance.

• It says CBSE reduced the software quality requirement from CMMI Level 5 to CMMI Level 3.

• The author argues CBSE changed project experience rules to help companies with many smaller projects, instead of requiring strong large-scale marking experience.

• The article claims CBSE weakened data center and security requirements, raising concerns about student data safety.

• A later corrigendum allegedly removed CBSE’s power to blacklist the vendor for repeated mistakes.

• The penalty system allegedly focused more on delays than marking or scanning accuracy.

• The main concern is that students’ marks and personal data may have been put at risk.

• The author wants CBSE to explain why these tender changes were made and whether the contract award was fair.

• Bottom line: the article alleges CBSE changed tender rules in ways that benefited Coempt despite red flags around the company’s past and technical capability.

Originally posted by: shalu_libra

This is shocking. And any idea on who own Coempt Edu & why it was favoured?

VSN Raju: Director and CEO (previously led Globarena).

Prof. Sadagopan: Chairman (Founding Director of IIIT Bangalore).

M. Anantha Chary: Managing Director.

Dr. R. Jayaraman: Director.

AV Narayana: Director.

It is said on internet that Sadgopan had internal leverage... but mostly coempt was favoured because they charged 20 something and TCS had bid per paper at 60 something.

Also there are statements like teachers weren't trained, system was glitching and students complaining were called Pakistanis and abused. THen CBSE circulated notice that schools should give statements in their favour and principals of many schools did support COEMPT. INdian Express and Hindustan times wrote an article on this.

Dharmendra Pradhan's clownery is not helping either. 17 children died by suicide and he's still sitting as education minister?

https://youtube.com/shorts/Mkw29uPFi1w

Even this child was called Pakistani 🤦

https://youtube.com/shorts/L0vJRn-G62w

CBSE needs to stop PR game. Why enter polarising politics in education?

https://youtube.com/shorts/xDwQa7TBtbI

Here's the Twitter thread with blog link. This boy has done what investigative journalism should have done but they are busy talking about melody and how prices haven't increased that much.

Kudos to this boy. Hope left with youngsters only to tackle corruption

https://x.com/i/status/2060356865645859314

Some more info

https://x.com/i/status/2060569984791929108

https://x.com/i/status/2060533728615763997

Bhaiyon aur behnon Amritkaal ka anand utha rahe hai ki nahi?

https://x.com/i/status/2060770188661039279

https://x.com/i/status/2060646889754943780

But what can we expect when NTA can't even write the correct url of its own website. 🤷

https://x.com/i/status/2060753706363322431

Ye bachhe to CBSE NTA ki poori pol patti khol rahe hai. Kudos to these boys

https://x.com/i/status/2060945027124392027