Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi-EDT #16 DT note p25 - Page 64

They should’ve just brought Ansh’s humshakal who pretends to be Ansh to loot Viranis

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

I seriously don't believe that Ekta couldn't find a decent actor to play negative role.. That she had to bring Akash.

But I don't think they will repeat KNA track

I mean, I understand where you’re coming from but the lot of actors in this generation suck. I couldn’t even tolerate watching MunRik romance today in the middle of the dramatic scenes we had today. I wanted them out of my screen so I could see Tulsi freak out, Karan cry and Rio looking like he’s gonna audition for Paa 2!

The decent actors are expensive and Ekta probably thought if I am spending good money why not just get Aakash back for shock value. I believe she could’ve very well cast another actor like say Namik in this role even if he may have seem a bit older too, but for some reason Ekta went with Aakash.

Personally, I would’ve preferred Namik or the guy who played Anupama’s good son who died, dunno his real name; but both are good actors. The latter would have looked age appropriate too, but not sure if he could have pulled off a negative role or even wanted to play one like this. Maybe Sehban Azim?!

IDK what’s Ekta thinking though…

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

She should’ve just brought Pearl.

He’s a good actor and would’ve looked good as Ansh’s son.

POCSO case accused…

Maybe can work on another show but not one with a former cabinet minister who could return to the same again in the future.

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

S2 age calculation harder than masters in math lol. In my head everyone is younger than what we had seen back in s1

Nandini when woke up and K T were having their hide and seek meet up , N found Karan's diary where he has written that he always loved nandini but now his heart belongs to someone else. Maybe during those few years but he truly moved on. Kinda like a widower remarries . And if nandini didn't wake up KT would be together happier

Because of this whenever karan used to accuse tanya of nandini leaving him, I always felt the anger was directed at himself. If he hadn't moved on with tanya. If he didn't write the diary. Didn't meet tanya in secret. N would still be there with him.

Whatever it was but I always felt Karan just took advantage of Tanya. I am not saying Tanya was saint ...she married Karan despite knowing he wud not love her or probably thought he will come to love her considering Nandini was in coma but she was hoping to go back to SN when Nandini came back from coma fully knowing Nandini was preggers with Karan;s kid...and Karan that man he didn't even acknowledge he married Tanya but he just happily continued his marriage with Nandini...these actions are nothing but cheating but just to say Karan cheated Nandini with Tanya while she was in coma was something I dont agree to...and later after leap he disrespected Tanya and Tanya was shown as an independent woman pre leap...why would she even be with a man who doesn't even love her...lol...but I suppose we should not connect any of these tracks to S2

Namik would be better as Parth tbh.

I think Anupamaa’s bad son Paritosh would’ve been a good choice for Ansh’s son.

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

Originally posted by: The_Best

Not every married couple has a child right away. It’s not necessarily that married Karan Nandini had children right away. Parth can be born first through Karan Tanya while Karan was married to Nandini like in S1. Since they are following s1 story when it comes to Tanya Karan, then Nandini was in coma and he was with Tanya and had Parth. Later when Nandini woke up, Karan had more children with Nandini

Again I am jumping in because I genuinely cannot agree with the way this is being interpreted. If we are saying lets stick strictly to what has been established in S2, then we need to fully commit to that and let's remove S1 dependency of Bhumi altogether.

Let’s assume for the sake of this debate that Karan cheated on Nandini and that she went into a coma (even though none of this is explicitly established in S2). Let’s go with that version.

Now if we actually look at the timeline presented in S2 things start falling apart.

In Episode 1 Mihir and Tulsi are celebrating their 38th wedding anniversary. It is also established that Mihir's involvement with Mandira happened during his memory loss phase which was around the time Gautam was born. That would logically place Karan at least about a year younger than Gautam. So probably Gautam was around 37 and Karan would be around 36 in that first episode.

Now before the 6 year leap in S2 Parth is introduced and shown to be around 18. That creates an age gap of about 18 years between Karan and Parth which basically means Karan would have been around 17 - 18 when Parth was born.

It is established that Parth is Karan and Tanya’s child and if this happened while Karan was already married to Nandini, then logically Karan would have been in a relationship with Nandini atleast at 17 which effectively implies a child marriage.

Are we really saying that the Viranis who are always shown as socially upright and value driven would allow child marriage?...It's Illegal and this entire “Karan cheated Nandini with Tanya” narrative doesnot hold up when we apply S2’s own timeline.

Even if we stretch the numbers and assume Karan is 37 the math still does not work. That would mean he fathered Parth at around 18 - 19. So are we saying he was already married to Nandini at 18? Because that is the only way the “he cheated on Nandini” argument fits. And that itself creates another problem when Nandini was introduced, she had already completed her graduation. She was not a teenager. She was introduced as a journalist....So how does that timeline even align with Karan being married that early?

Then where does Ansh’s entire track fit into this? That was a major part of their story, and there is no clear way to place it within this compressed timeline without everything overlapping unrealistically. So whether we look at it from age, timeline, or character arcs the logic just doesn’t hold if we try to frame it as Karan cheating on Nandini within just the S2 setup.

Now adding another layer of Nandini’s recollection in day before yesterday's episode...She recalls her journey with Karan starting from their early interactions and in S1 he was introduced as someone who had completed his MBA....so he met Nandini around 22–23. That part of their timeline is still emotionally referenced.

But in S2, Parth is already 18 pre-leap and in his early 20s post-leap. That again disrupts the idea that Karan had a fully established married life with Nandini before Tanya came into the picture which is why if we strictly go by S2’s internal logic, a more plausible explanation is Karan and Tanya had an early relationship (possibly even a ONS) which led to circumstances that made him marry Tanya and that could position Tanya as his first wife in this version of the story.

Because that at least aligns better with the age math and avoids forcing a child marriage, marriage at 18 and all this timeline contradiction.

So again, my point is if we are choosing S2 as the base, then the “Karan cheated Nandini” argument does not just become morally debatable it actually becomes logically inconsistent. At this stage it feels like we are trying to fit an S1 narrative into an S2 framework that clearly does not support it.

Originally posted by: The_Best

https://x.com/nishanttweets30/status/2048458040962425119

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan