Global Alert: US–Israel's Major Military Operations against Iran🔥#2 - Page 75

Originally posted by: xnbstar

No, it is not related to a place of worship. It is about initiating a journey from one place, like someone is coming from abroad so it's usually said. It is mainly about the journey.

Both Mecca and Medina are the safest places on Planet Earth.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Matlab US se panga lene ki himmat nhi hai to India ko attack kar denge?? Ye badi achhi baat kahi

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

What am I reading - mocking of Gods is worse than terrorism

This same logic was applied to kill about 3-4 people using slogans - gustakh e nabi ki ek saza, sar tan se juda, sar tan se juda

Nupur sharma still has to live in fear because of the life threats just because she mentioned the Hadith of Muhammad marrying a 6 year old and consummating marriage when she was 9 years old.

Will i get death threats too for writing the same and then someone will justify that it's okay because mocking Gods is worse than terrorism?

So this is the 3rd person I'm seeing here who is justifying terrorism and killing people if they mock God... Cos for them mocking Gods is worse than terrorism.

This is absolutely disgusting to say.

P.s. i know Mohammed is not God but in Islam his stature is right after God.

Idk man, i never really understood the logic where mocking god is considered worse than terrorism. Terrorism exists in the real world, real people suffer, lives are lost and families are left shattered. That damage is real and irreversible. In contrast, the existence of god itself is something we are not even certain about. And i say this while applying the same thinking to all religions, including my own.

Im hindu, proud one and altho my family is religious, i didnt grow up in an environment where beliefs were forced on me. Thats probably why i see things differently. My faith isnt fixed, it keeps changing. Sometimes i believe, sometimes i dont. If i had to put it into numbers, its probably something like 70-30, with belief being the smaller part.

My family never pressured me into praying or following rituals. My mom occasionally says that praying can bring positive results and sometimes i go along with it but there are also phases where i dont believe at all. Its an ongoing process, not something constant or absolute.

Still i do feel there might be some higher force out there but im not sure if calling it god is even the right way to define it. What i like most about being hindu is that it allows this kind of flexibility. I can question, doubt, believe or not believe and still belong. There is no rigid boundary forcing me into one identity.

For me, real world harm matters more than abstract beliefs. Crimes like terrorism, rape and murder happens in real life and directly destroy lives so they will always be far worse than mocking god. And personally, i believe that if god has given me chance to live, then my priority should be to live life to fullest without harming others. Everything else heaven, hell or divine judgment can come later which we arent even sure about.

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Former High Commissioner to India, Abdul Basit- File image- PTI

‘We’ll bomb Delhi, Mumbai if US targets our nukes’: Pakistan’s former envoy to IndiaFP News Desk • March 22, 2026, 09:00:09????

Basit, who served as Islamabad’s top diplomat in New Delhi from 2014 to 2017 framed India as Pakistan’s “default” target in a worst-case scenario where the US targets its nuclear assets.

As tensions in West Asia intensify amid the ongoing Iran war involving the United States and Israel, a controversial statement by former Pakistan High Commissioner to India Abdul Basit has raised fresh concerns about regional security.

Speaking about a hypothetical worst-case scenario, Basit, who served as Islamabad’s top diplomat in New Delhi from 2014 to 2017, suggested that Pakistan could strike India if faced with an existential military threat from the US or Israel.

Thank you for tagging me.

Firstly, I fail to understand the threat that US targets on countries with nukes.

No country even if have nukes, will not release one easily because they are aware of the destruction if would bring to themselves and the others.

Whatever we might say, people of the world still remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki and thus they think twice before releasing nukes.

Secondly, already there is so much going on around the world, can we not expect these former diplomats to actually act like one for once in times of crises and actually try to bring stability and peace instead of provoking others to start something that wouldn’t be easy to end.

Originally posted by: IamRaj96

Idk man, i never really understood the logic where mocking god is considered worse than terrorism. Terrorism exists in the real world, real people suffer, lives are lost and families are left shattered. That damage is real and irreversible. In contrast, the existence of god itself is something we are not even certain about. And i say this while applying the same thinking to all religions, including my own.

Im hindu, proud one and altho my family is religious, i didnt grow up in an environment where beliefs were forced on me. Thats probably why i see things differently. My faith isnt fixed, it keeps changing. Sometimes i believe, sometimes i dont. If i had to put it into numbers, its probably something like 70-30, with belief being the smaller part.

My family never pressured me into praying or following rituals. My mom occasionally says that praying can bring positive results and sometimes i go along with it but there are also phases where i dont believe at all. Its an ongoing process, not something constant or absolute.

Still i do feel there might be some higher force out there but im not sure if calling it god is even the right way to define it. What i like most about being hindu is that it allows this kind of flexibility. I can question, doubt, believe or not believe and still belong. There is no rigid boundary forcing me into one identity.

For me, real world harm matters more than abstract beliefs. Crimes like terrorism, rape and murder happens in real life and directly destroy lives so they will always be far worse than mocking god. And personally, i believe that if god has given me chance to live, then my priority should be to live life to fullest without harming others. Everything else heaven, hell or divine judgment can come later which we arent even sure about.

I couldn't have written better. Totally agree with everything u wrote.

Infact it's the beauty of Sanatan Dharma that a person can be atheist or agnostic and still be a Hindu. No one will threaten him of hell or kill him for not believing in God.

However, what really scares me is when these so called moderates, who we have high hopes from, and who talk about humanity, defend terrorism by saying mocking of God is worse than terrorism.

I reiterate - No, mocking of anyone, even God cannot be worse than terrorism.

Originally posted by: xnbstar

@bold That slogan is rubbish and no one has a right to have justice in their hands. I completely disagree with those inteha pasand people jo aisey kaam karty hn.

Secondly, on the other hand, why mocking others or make fun. Let everyone stay in theid limits. Dunya me aur bhi bahut ziada important issues to work on rather than disrespecting each other.

Now that we are actually having a discussion I hope you take my replies in the manner intended vs your friends constant insults and attempts to silence me.

Imagine your words “mocking gods is worse than terrorism”. Now (not you ) imagine someone taking those words into action. It’s what’s happened to Charlie Hebdo and several others killings and few others facing death threats.

Now think what is radicalization process. It’s implanting this thinking and then suggesting repeatedly that they should now act on it. Not just be unhappy. That action is now Islamic terrorism / extremism. I am not suggesting that for you so that we are clear. The same people that act are the ones also openly blasphemous about other religions and gods and killing others. This is what nupur, Salman Rushdie and others are facing. This is real world and not made up facts. People are facing serious threats and the threat are real as people like Charlie Hebdo have been killed along with many others in fact that is what Iran has done with its mass killing of protestors

This is what people are talking to you about. At a minimum it deserves some thinking. I hope you agree.

That is why I love our ways. We believe in karma. It’s not our job to kill others for what we don’t agree upon. At the same time for Islamic extremism/terrorism is certainly something to act upon.

please read above in the spirit of discussion and continue. I will be back later.

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

I couldn't have written better. Totally agree with everything u wrote.

Infact it's the beauty of Sanatan Dharma that a person can be atheist or agnostic and still be a Hindu. No one will threaten him of hell or kill him for not believing in God.

However, what really scares me is when these so called moderates, who we have high hopes from, and who talk about humanity, defend terrorism by saying mocking of God is worse than terrorism.

I reiterate - No, mocking of anyone, even God cannot be worse than terrorism.

I consider myself a moderate. Im not sure which moderates you were referring to but personally, i believe terrorism and other real world crimes are far worse than mocking god or any individual. Even things like animal cruelty are more worse to me than someone making offensive remarks about religion or god.

Im not extremely religious but i do feel the need to defend hinduism at times. The reason is simple, i dont like the selective nature of criticism. Sanatan isnt a rigid belief system, it allows questioning, debate and even criticism. That openness is one of its strengths.

However, what i often notice is that people feel comfortable mocking or criticizing hinduism precisely because it is flexible, while they hesitate to do the same with abrahamic religions due to fear of backlash or consequences.

Im not saying sanatan dharma is perfect, it isnt and it absolutely deserves criticism where necessary. But that criticism should be fair and consistent. If you are willing to question one religion, then you should be willing to question others as well.

As a hindu, i value the freedom my religion gives me, the freedom to think, question and interpret. Thats something i genuinely love about hinduism and its why i stand up for it. I welcome honest criticism but not selective outrage or hypocrisy.

Originally posted by: Cynical1

Now that we are actually having a discussion I hope you take my replies in the manner intended vs your friends constant insults and attempts to silence me.

Imagine your words “mocking gods is worse than terrorism”. Now (not you ) imagine someone taking those words into action. It’s what’s happened to Charlie Hebdo and several others killings and few others facing death threats.

Now think what is radicalization process. It’s implanting this thinking and then suggesting repeatedly that they should now act on it. Not just be unhappy. That action is now Islamic terrorism / extremism. I am not suggesting that for you so that we are clear. The same people that act are the ones also openly blasphemous about other religions and gods and killing others. This is what nupur, Salman Rushdie and others are facing. This is real world and not made up facts. People are facing serious threats and the threat are real as people like Charlie Hebdo have been killed along with many others in fact that is what Iran has done with its mass killing of protestors

This is what people are talking to you about. At a minimum it deserves some thinking. I hope you agree.

That is why I love our ways. We believe in karma. It’s not our job to kill others for what we don’t agree upon. At the same time for Islamic extremism/terrorism is certainly something to act upon.

please read above in the spirit of discussion and continue. I will be back later.

@bold 💯💯💯 I remember during my college days when the same incident happened in my city and I was against this but others were keep targeting me. Still my stance was same that it’s never allowed to take justice on our hands. Tolerance and forgiveness should be incorporated instead and keep the rest of the matter to our Lord. Howevers, those people need to understand too that making fun of others is equally unacceptable too.

See, my aim was to say that mocking is not acceptable since it could hurt the sentiments of those who firmly belief in our Creator. But it never meant that Terrorism can get a clear chit. Nobody in their right mind would want to see bloodshed. Humans are designed to feel pain and empathy.

Despite having contrasting differences, we are humans first. We need to explore ways to diminish the negative perception of each other. I understand opinions vary largely, but to some extent, at last, we all are rooting for a wonderful planet Earth, aren't we?

And lastly, no body is my friend here. I just joined this discussion when one user told me on the world cup thread regarding this. Well, I am not silencing you at all. I am reading and replying. Thanks for understanding.

Lol this just resurfaced on my X 🤣🤣.

https://x.com/i/status/15597428698779648

Originally posted by: IamRaj96

I consider myself a moderate. Im not sure which moderates you were referring to but personally, i believe terrorism and other real world crimes are far worse than mocking god or any individual. Even things like animal cruelty are more worse to me than someone making offensive remarks about religion or god.

Im not extremely religious but i do feel the need to defend hinduism at times. The reason is simple, i dont like the selective nature of criticism. Sanatan isnt a rigid belief system, it allows questioning, debate and even criticism. That openness is one of its strengths.

However, what i often notice is that people feel comfortable mocking or criticizing hinduism precisely because it is flexible, while they hesitate to do the same with abrahamic religions due to fear of backlash or consequences.

Im not saying sanatan dharma is perfect, it isnt and it absolutely deserves criticism where necessary. But that criticism should be fair and consistent. If you are willing to question one religion, then you should be willing to question others as well.

As a hindu, i value the freedom my religion gives me, the freedom to think, question and interpret. Thats something i genuinely love about hinduism and its why i stand up for it. I welcome honest criticism but not selective outrage or hypocrisy.

I was talking about the moderate who believes mocking of God is worse than terrorism.

Perfect is something that doesn't need any change. However, Sanatan dharma has changed in every yuga. For ex. In Treta yug, in the Yug of lord Ram, brothers wouldn't even think of killing their brothers but at the end of Dwapar, Lord Krishna himself encouraged for the holy war against adharma even if it meant killing one's own brothers & elders. So Sanatan Dharma is something that is ever evolving and encompassing. It is not stuck in some distant era.