Originally posted by: A_Star39
that scene triggered me.
If armaan was the besht husband ever he would have stopped her from touching feet since we have a culture Betiyan lakshmi ka roop hoti hai
idk this gen has been really regressive towards women.Women have not self worth in this gen.only ruhi and tanya can be considered worthy as of this leap.
These are the little things that greatly influence the watchers.Any 12-17 year old watching(considering the age group) that watches yrkkh they can get blindly influenced by such ideals. Like serving your husband falling at his feet.
Also 90 percent of the leads romantic scenes have been very cheap.
Before marriage, in most cultures, girls generally do not touch anyone’s feet.
After marriage, they can touch their in-laws’ feet for blessings, and on very specific occasions, even their husbands’. In Punjabi, Marwadi, and Gujarati cultures, even that is not encouraged — it depends on the family.
In cities and metropolitan areas, it’s not followed much because of cultural differences. Smaller towns/villages tend to follow such practices still. It depends a lot on their customs.
@red: No, it need not have a religion-al context at all. A good husband thinks of his wife as his equal, hence she need not touch his feet nor seek “his” blessings. But we have already established Armaan is not a good human being, let alone a good husband, so woh aisi chindi harkaaton se baaz nahi aayega.
@bold: I have a difference of opinion when it comes to Ruhi, but yeah, this gen has been the most regressive across ITV, not just Rishta. Zero character development—each leap is worse than the last.
Aam taur pe nobody should get influenced by the crap they show on television. Why do teenagers even watch this shit?
I agree, the whole gen has been regressive. I have no qualms in saying Abhira is a disgrace to the whole women folk.
@violet: I haven’t seen their romantic scenes, so I have no idea.
!!
/
86