Originally posted by: purplegirl7
When Bunty pointed at Yuvi as culprit and told everyone what he saw, Yuvi accused Bunty of lying and claimed innocence. Mannat knows Bunty better and calmly defended he is not lying, while Malla 'defended' Yuvi and accused Mannat of deliberately accusing Yuvi. From this point, Vik and Mannat had lowered their voice. If the public heard Vik indirectly accusing Bunty of lying and falsely accusing Yuvi to trap him because they dont get along, then they also heard Mannat pointing out how Yuvi tried to harm Dua and Bunty, and he blamed Mannat before finding out Yuvi was wrong. Now too he questioned Bunty while still blindly defending Yuvi, but later took the right step and questioned Yuvi. She is well within her rights as Dua's mother and Bunty's guardian to ask for a fair investigation.
It seemed to me Mannat was trying to point out Vik's pattern of dealing with the situation and how it ended. She didnt accuse Yuvi for the blast, she used past tense, not present tense. She and DK believed on Bunty's word but couldnt believe a kid could take such big step on his own and figured out someone else is behind it.
This following thing is not related to you in particular but I want to say in general.....so what if I feel and say mannat is wrong in particular incident, It doesn't mean I hate her, It doesn't mean I say she is a bad person.. It certainly doesn't mean I am defending vik.... It was a simple opinion of mine which I casually shared.. and seeing us discuss it for so long, some being defensive, assuming things regarding me is just making feel like I am doing some crime saying things against mannat.. 
Honestly despite feeling mannat is wrong I don't think she is so wrong that she needs to be crucified for it neither am I doing it,I understand she is doing it because she is concerned for her daughter.... I just pointed out my pov in a single post in response to a another post, and we are continuing to discuss regarding it for so long..
I said this in many posts of mine, seems like you might have missed them, so sharing my pov to you too..
My pov is that,mannat should have been little bit objective in the entire scenario...she has alrights to demand investigation but she doesn't have rights to indicate something against a child by bringing his past in front of so many people that too without knowing entire scenario and other side's version,ya it's not mannat's responsibility to do it as she is not organizer but it becomes her responsibility when she is indicating something against a child ... And no, she didn't just stand up for bunty but she actually indicated yuvi could do it by bringing in past... Had she just stood up for bunty then she would have said bunty doesn't lie and asked Vik to investigate further if it's just coincidence or there is something more... But she got in yuvi's past of hurting dua, bunty ..to indicate yuvi could have done it... we know the truth but mannat doesn't ....so expecting her to be little bit objective in the situation especially considering it's such sensitive issue involving a child and so many aggressive people around...having such expectation is not wrong, I guess...
Again saying it was a simple opinion of mine I am not crucifying mannat for it, neither am I putting mannat on a pedestal to be perfect, I was simply stating that she could have dealt with the situation differently
And I understand all you guys pov but still stand on mine, I want to end this discussion here, atleast from my side...Love, peace to all...
. 
. He speaks so over confidently that I fear this plan will fail. 
Fan Fictions
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
1.4k