Shahid Kapoor Questions Credibility of Critics - Page 3

Critical acclaim aint nothing but fronting anyway

Aukaat ki bat karein toh Mira ki kya aukaat hai jo woh celeb bani pher Rahi hai 😆

https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/features/despite-round-performer-big-hits-eluding-shahid-kapoor-trade-experts-share-views-change-advisors-suggest-films-sign/

ye hamesha rota hi rehta hai. 5 year old baby.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Critical acclaim aint nothing but fronting anyway

For acclaim and the contrary, the professional credentials of the person who does it should be what counts. The sad reputation of the corruptibility that corrupt people in India gave to the world (and which doesn't stop to increase) doesn't give a lot of confidence to - maybe - even honest critics... Personally, the changing I felt in Komal's and Taran's behaviour makes me skip anything they have to say/write since a while. Already some years ago, I stopped to care for Anupama and Rajeev... sadly, far too many have become 'mouthpieces' of their 'masters' (outside or inside). I got the feeling that I prefer members and some selected critics (Indian and Western ones)...

Shahid just says what many filmmaking people (not only in India) feel since social media platforms give the possibility to gain attention (and an income) to everyone who craves for it. But I guess, the point of saturation may not get reached yet for a while until the interest declines dramatically...

film critics have straight up become extortionists

Matlab ab iski movies ko criticise karne ke liye logo ki aukat honi chaie? Opinion is free Shahid, everybody has one, we don’t need gold standards for that