Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 39 - Page 97

If Mukta is intent on following Ektas template then VY shaadi puri hogi. Third times a charm 🙈

Uske baad truth reveal hoga possibly of Dua.

Y will ask for all Property to be transferred in her name in exchange for divorce to Vik which he will do.

Thode din gareeb Vikku milega till they realise Vik never sent or signed the divorce papers to Mannat which will make VY marriage invalid.

And Mannat will help Vik get back all the property... probably then he will stop calling her GD 🤦‍♀️

Originally posted by: Mona_HappyLife

Equal treatment can be given when both are at equal stages of life.

Are ManVik at equal stages of life currently ? No.

Yes both are parents to Dua, both know half truths, both lost the chance to lead a happy married life with each other, both lost their family members.

Vikrant was the father unknowingly but did he had to go thru all the trouble pre, during & post pregnancy ? No.

Did he had go thru extreme amount of CA ? No.

Was he answerable to society for carrying pregnant child whose father is not known ? No.

Did he have to arrange for a fake partner and pretend to be married for the sake of society inspite of how painful it would be ? No.

Mannat went above all through all alone. Having DK or RoTu doesnt eliminate the fact that in such delicate situations, woman always looks for her partner but Vikrant whom she loved the most abandoned her...

And then few years later she sees her with some random woman. How she is gonna react then ?

But after seeing him with Yashika she didn’t try hurting him to get some reaction out of him. And thats were the difference lies between both of them in handling such pre carious situations..

Bold - isn't this what my original post meant about gender bias? . We are judging Vikrant not for his actions but because he is a male and he cannot conceive. Would Vikrant CA be any less of a mistake had Vikrant been female character and conceived while they separated?

Originally posted by: scarlett22

I thought pre leap he believed Vishakha when she told him Mannat was with DK. Pre leap him believing it was stupid and when he saw then post leap he remembered Vishakha telling him that. His pre leap belief that Mannat was having an afffair was reinforced. Even today Vishakha accused DK of snatching his brother’s fiancée.

Did I understand correctly?

I had the same understanding during the fight when he reacts in the room about DK proposing. Then if you remember when he finds out Shurti died, he quickly switches to Mannat is my wife who is DK to support. I posted this comment pre-leap as well, I don't know what Vikrant believed pre-leap

From yesterday - why was Vikrant not surprised that Malla and Vish were protecting Arzoo so much?!!

I get he allowed DCP to go ahead check if… but shouldn’t Vik put his brain in action

Originally posted by: Rdigest

Bold - this comment proves my point about gender bias. We are judging Vikrant not for his actions but because he is a male and he cannot conceive. Would Vikrant CA be any less of a mistake had Vikrant been female character and conceived while they separated?

Thats not gender bias... its common sense. 🤦‍♀️

Do you not understand a parent child relationship?

Even courts dont allow a child to legally separate from his/her parents till he/she is 18 years of age/adult. Its called legal Emancipation.

An age where the person is deemed responsible for their own actions.

Mannat cannot take a decision without keeping Duas wellbeing in picture... that would be selfish and wrong. Her decisions have repercussions on not just her life but also Duas life... a child born to her and dependent on her till she is an adult.

If not Mannat who should be the responsible adult for Dua???? DK??? RoTu??? Or a missing Vikrant who (as per Mannat) has disowned the child.

I was hesitant to post a reply to you... you successfully pushed me.

Understand the actual meaning of the word before making such claims yaar 🤦‍♀️

Originally posted by: Rdigest

Bold - this comment proves my point about gender bias. We are judging Vikrant not for his actions but because he is a male and he cannot conceive. Would Vikrant CA be any less of a mistake had Vikrant been female character and conceived while they separated?

Gender bias was started by whom ?

Not by us here but by the society outside who compelled Mannat to take decisions which would safeguard her & Dua.

Society is gender biased hence Vikrant is able to still go-ahead and technically get married for the 3rd time, still gets sympathized even after allowing Yashika in his room but parallelly feels upset thinking about Mannat.

But DKs presence in Mannat's life leads to DKs bashing even though he has never told her upfront that he loves her & only told Neetu that may be he likes her...the word being May be, which many of you have pointed so many times...so isn't this gender bias then ?

Vik in the garb of going thru trauma & pain gets leeway of being cozy with Yashika but Mannat more than pain of loosing Vikrant & Shruti has to primarily fulfil moral responsibility of her child ends up choosing DK but still gets bashed left & right...

Originally posted by: Moor278

Thats not gender bias... its common sense. 🤦‍♀️

Do you not understand a parent child relationship?

Even courts dont allow a child to legally separate from his/her parents till he/she is 18 years of age/adult. Its called legal Emancipation.

An age where the person is deemed responsible for their own actions.

Mannat cannot take a decision without keeping Duas wellbeing in picture... that would be selfish and wrong. Her decisions have repercussions on not just her life but also Duas life... a child born to her and dependent on her till she is an adult.

If not Mannat who should be the responsible adult for Dua???? DK??? RoTu??? Or a missing Vikrant who (as per Mannat) has disowned the child.

I was hesitant to post a reply to you... you successfully pushed me.

Understand the actual meaning of the word before making such claims yaar 🤦‍♀️

Moor, I didn't mean to push you, apologizes if my post came across unruly ❤️ . We all can stick to our opinions and debate. Just cause I don't believe what you are pointing out and you don't believe what I am pointing out neither one is wrong or not the other is correct from each of our perspectives.

How is it common sense and not gender bias when we treat mistakes and criticize characters based on gender?

"Vikrant was the father unknowingly but did he had to go thru all the trouble pre, during & post pregnancy ? No."

This is the comment I responded to , and here's my comment "We are judging Vikrant not for his actions but because he is a male and he cannot conceive. Would Vikrant CA be any less of a mistake had Vikrant been female character and conceived while they separated?"

Did I say Mannat cannot take decisions for Dua's well-being? In my post I was only referring to making a pact about lying to Dua repeating the same mistake and lying on BC. Infact you can ho back and see my posts, I even pointed out who is Neetu to reveal the truth when she lied to Dua to meet Vikrant.

Where is the well being here , atleast not from my understanding. Infact I was glad atleast for lying Ronnie showed them the mirror. However, we cannot call out Mannat for repeating the same mistakes like pre-leap because this is attributed to safeguarding Dua. If it was safe guarding Dua why didn't she protest and put her foot down with Ronnie?

Now coming back to my post, let's take Vikrant for example, does his CA Mannat be any less of a mistake if he were a female and gone through pregnancy, post pregnancy, had a baby ? No, it will not is the point I am trying to make. So Mannat should be critized when she doesn't learn from her mistakes, Mannat should be held responsible for what happened pre-leap just like Vikrant made mistakes pre and post leap.

Mona, my whole post was about gender bias and how audience is reacting to similar situations so ofcourse I brought up the topic.

Did you see any of my posts defending Vikrant's CA, his scenes with Y , him agreeing to marry Y ? Please point me to my posts so I can rectify my mistake.

And regarding DK, yes you will see my posts for this character, because Y is portrayed as a GD and for what she is, DK he committed crimes, used his position for his benefit, dumped his brother knowing what Vish did to him, supported Vish about taking Saluja wealth , so yes I dislike his character and call him out since makers are not calling him out. I constantly pointed out if he is intended to be a good character, why didn't he try and meet up Vikrant again and explain things , this is the same brother he apparently loved for years. Remember what he told Neetu, he has nothing to do with Vikrant, would a brother knowing he is stuck with his vicious mother act this way ?

Originally posted by: Rdigest

Moor, I didn't mean to push you, apologizes if my post came across unruly ❤️ . We all can stick to our opinions and debate. Just cause I don't believe what you are pointing out and you don't believe what I am pointing out neither one is wrong or not the other is correct from each of our perspectives.

How is it common sense and not gender bias when we treat mistakes and criticize characters based on gender?

"Vikrant was the father unknowingly but did he had to go thru all the trouble pre, during & post pregnancy ? No."

This is the comment I responded to , and here's my comment "We are judging Vikrant not for his actions but because he is a male and he cannot conceive. Would Vikrant CA be any less of a mistake had Vikrant been female character and conceived while they separated?"

Did I say Mannat cannot take decisions for Dua's well-being? In my post I was only referring to making a pact about lying to Dua repeating the same mistake and lying on BC. Infact you can ho back and see my posts, I even pointed out who is Neetu to reveal the truth when she lied to Dua to meet Vikrant.

Where is the well being here , atleast not from my understanding. Infact I was glad atleast for lying Ronnie showed them the mirror. However, we cannot call out Mannat for repeating the same mistakes like pre-leap because this is attributed to safeguarding Dua. If it was safe guarding Dua why didn't she protest and put her foot down with Ronnie?

Now coming back to my post, let's take Vikrant for example, does his CA Mannat be any less of a mistake if he were a female and gone through pregnancy, post pregnancy, had a baby ? No, it will not is the point I am trying to make. So Mannat should be critized when she doesn't learn from her mistakes, Mannat should be held responsible for what happened pre-leap just like Vikrant made mistakes pre and post leap.

Mona, my whole post was about gender bias and how audience is reacting to similar situations so ofcourse I brought up the topic.

Did you see any of my posts defending Vikrant's CA, his scenes with Y , him agreeing to marry Y ? Please point me to my posts so I can rectify my mistake.

And regarding DK, yes you will see my posts for this character, because Y is portrayed as a GD and for what she is, DK he committed crimes, used his position for his benefit, dumped his brother knowing what Vish did to him, supported Vish about taking Saluja wealth , so yes I dislike his character and call him out since makers are not calling him out. I constantly pointed out if he is intended to be a good character, why didn't he try and meet up Vikrant again and explain things , this is the same brother he apparently loved for years. Remember what he told Neetu, he has nothing to do with Vikrant, would a brother knowing he is stuck with his vicious mother act this way ?

Not sure how many times i have to mention...but..

Mannat hiding the truth from Dua was absolutely correct at that critical situation. As a mother she did the right thing keeping in mind Vik rejected her & her baby.

If Vikrant pushing away everyone after knowing Aman's truth is correct then the above one is also right.

Vikrant protected is real mom, his own blood. Mannat protected her own child securing Dua's future.

Originally posted by: Mona_HappyLife

Not sure how many times i have to mention...but..

Mannat hiding the truth from Dua was absolutely correct at that critical situation. As a mother she did the right thing keeping in mind Vik rejected her & her baby.

If Vikrant pushing away everyone after knowing Aman's truth is correct then the above one is also right.

Vikrant protected is real mom, his own blood. Mannat protected her own child securing Dua's future.

Did my post mention anything about Mannat hiding from Dua, Vikrant is the father at the moment is wrong ?

I was only pointing to how Mannat was making a pact to lie forever to Dua which is wrong especially after what happened with Vikrant and this was attributed to Dua's well-being which is not true , else Mannat wouldn't agree immediately to Ronnie correct?

350 cake cutting , looks like Ayesha is not there only Adnan, Dua and Bunty

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVG9AAxid08/