Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: EDT # 6 - Page 86

Originally posted by: BangBang_Shilpa

I like this comedy ka tadka in kyunki.

Poor Malti, the day Angad Vrinda and kids really shift to SN she won’t believe it and pass out when she finds out it actually happened from the shock of it finally happening

Though I’m honestly not very fond of Pari’s actress, I do find myself feeling bad for Pari as a character. In a way, this feels like karma for how far she went while planning and plotting against Tulsi she crossed several lines. That said, there’s also a painful irony here. Don’t our own parents often tell us that we won’t truly understand certain things until we become parents ourselves? That seems to be exactly what’s happening with Pari now. She’s experiencing firsthand the consequences and emotional weight of actions she once justified.

What I don’t understand, however, is how Ranvijay appears to have more authority or stake in the Virani Group than the actual family members themselves. That part feels illogical and poorly justified.

Also, the woman who framed Ajay and his family - how is she unable to take a stand against domestic violence? The way Ranvijay speaks to his own daughter is disturbing. At the very least, shouldn’t a mother draw the line when it comes to her child? Why can’t she take a stand or even consider walking away from such a marriage?

A child growing up in a hostile environment watching her mother being abused, living in fear of her own father is deeply damaging. It’s heartbreaking that this is being normalized on screen. If the adults refuse to break the cycle, the child inevitably ends up absorbing the trauma, fear, and dysfunction as normal.

It feels like this cycle will probably break only when Tulsi returns and supports Pari. But what’s truly disappointing is why Pari herself isn’t taking a stand. At some point, strength and accountability have to come from within. Waiting endlessly for a savior only prolongs the damage especially when an innocent child is growing up amidst fear, violence, and emotional instability.

That’s what makes this track uncomfortable not just the plot choices, but the message it ends up sending.

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Who is the dialogue writer?

He/she made Noyna say Kutch ke mele ke liye Kutch jaana hai 😭😭😭

Like where else are you supposed to go if the mela is in Kutch?

Khajuraho?! Kashmir?! Kathmandu?! 😭😭😭😭

In Ekta verse anything is possible...Kutch mela might be in K2

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Poor Malti, the day Angad Vrinda and kids really shift to SN she won’t believe it and pass out when she finds out it actually happened from the shock of it finally happening

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

Karan was an awful father. I found it disgusting how he’d blatantly praise Bhoomi just for being Nandini’s daughter and then taunt Tanya for spoiling Manthan. I don’t understand why he had a child if he wasn’t interested in raising him? Manthan deserved a better father like Gautam.

I agree that Karan was a deeply flawed father, especially with his blatant favouritism. But that only reinforces the point that Manthan’s issues weren’t Tanya’s fault alone. Karan’s emotional absence and constant comparisons played a huge role too.

Originally posted by: Me_Harini

In Ekta verse anything is possible...Kutch mela might be in K2

True. She could have imagined it on planet Krypton.

Originally posted by: Me_Harini

I don’t agree that the responsibility for how Bhoomi and Manthan turned out can be placed entirely on Tanya.

Not all mothers are the same, not all fathers are the same, and not all children are the same. Every family dynamic is different, shaped by personalities, emotional maturity, and the environment created by both parents.

Comparing Mandira raising Karan alone with Tanya raising Bhoomi and Manthan as if the outcomes should be identical oversimplifies a very complex process.

Mandira’s parenting may have worked but that doesn’t automatically mean every mother, under every circumstance, can compensate for an absent or emotionally unavailable father in the same way.

It’s already established that Karan himself was a deeply disturbed man emotionally unavailable, largely absent, and consumed by his past with Nandini. That absence matters. A father’s emotional disengagement doesn’t become irrelevant simply because the mother is a homemaker. Presence is not just physical; it is emotional involvement, guidance, and shared responsibility.

Also Mihir didn’t even know Karan was his son until much later. So even though Karan knew Mihir was his father, Mihir was neither physically nor emotionally available to him during his formative years. That kind of absence leaves a lasting imprint. The same cycle then repeats itself - Karan, while physically present in the house, was emotionally unavailable to his own children.

From a child’s perspective, emotional absence can feel as damaging as physical absence. Children don’t analyze intent; they respond to behavior. When a parent is distant, distracted, or disengaged, children naturally assume they are being ignored or unloved. That sense of emotional neglect shapes their insecurities, choices, and behavior.

I agree , Tanya made serious mistakes - over-indulging Bhoomi and Manthan, defending Manthan blindly, enabling bad behavior, projecting her insecurities, and failing to correct disrespect toward elders. Those criticisms are valid. But acknowledging Tanya’s failures does not erase Karan’s responsibility.

Didn’t Karan see that the kids were being disrespectful? As a parent, wasn’t it his responsibility to step in and correct them? Parenting doesn’t begin only when things go out of control. Ignoring problematic behavior while expecting one parent to handle everything is itself a failure of responsibility.

Karan chose emotional distance, remained largely disengaged, and stepped in only when situations had already escalated. Parenting is not just about reacting in moments of crisis; it is about consistent presence, boundaries, guidance, and emotional availability.

Blaming only Tanya also reflects a broader imbalance: when children turn out well, both parents take credit; when they don’t, the mother is often singled out.

Tanya may have failed in many ways but Karan’s absence, emotional neglect, and inconsistent involvement were equally damaging. Bhoomi and Manthan were shaped by both parents the values they absorbed, the behavior they witnessed, and the emotional environment they grew up in.

Parenthood is a partnership. It cannot be reduced to who stayed home longer or who earned more. When children struggle, responsibility must be shared and in this case, the failure was collective, not individual.

@bold are you sure? I think Mihir always knew Karan was his son. That's why he was in touch with Mandira. They had a dialogue with Mihir saying that he saw Mandira lying on a hospital bed all alone, so out of humanity he accompanied till she regained her health and (lied) that she only remembers Amar as her husband. He by mistake got into a relationship with her once but post that she was only her son's mother to him..

Definitely Mihir wasn't strong enough to recognise Karan openly and let him live as an illegitimate child but he definitely fulfilled fatherly duties economically

Noyna said jo Gayatri,Tulsi ki nahi hui itne saal seva karne ke baad wo meri kya hogi.

Originally posted by: BangBang_Shilpa

I like this comedy ka tadka in kyunki.

Bharti ji is such a sweetheart...

She can play positive negative comic every character with ease

But she always plays a Marathi woman, I want her to play some other ethnicity