Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 35 - Page 107

Spot on question.

How does one wish it away? or accept?

I remember someone telling me, after a point, in life, you need to look upon your parents as human beings, you have to bring them from the pedestal they occupy as parents in your childhood. They didn't know any better when they were young!

I don't know, it's shared here or not, but one more goofballs ka iv..here you go :

https://youtu.be/PmihVkMMO6k?si=2JvNR8-aUXtnAOfb

Originally posted by: Rdigest

Ok is it me or does Vikrant look weird, subdued and unstable 😨. The way he went no no no can't be Yuvi hasn't eaten the cake, he has to eat the cake he has to eat the cake, am I over thinking kyaa ?

Ngl i kinda saw old neetu in him. Its like he is now trapped inside his bubble which he calls his family and due to his 7 years old trauma, he is kinda trying to hold onto this fake world.

Originally posted by: Bettyscar

I think she never recovered from losing Vikrant. Probably what Ronnie was worried about when he helped hide the truth. It's probably taken her back to when she lost the initial Vikrant. Now that untreated trauma plus this loss has taken a toll. Vikrant will be put in more guilt in this phase, when he will learn what Neetu has gone through in past after loosing her child and what she is going through after loosing a child for the second time.

I want to ask something. Just a thought that crossed my mind. When a parent does the unimaginable what's the right thing to do? Is there a right thing to do? Is there a right or wrong reaction? I'm wondering if Mannat made any judgement of RoTu's actions or to her bottomline was they are Vikrant's parents no matter the sin. In one of the bts i heard her saying to Vikrant you make relationships in name only. I'm not trying to judge the act itself. I'm just wondering if Mannat just looked at the relationship only and not what they have done.

When a parent commits something unimaginable in that case morally, the act can be condemned, but emotionally and relationally people respond based on their values, attachments, and empathy. Right and wrong exist for the action but reactions to it often fall into a grey patch. There is no black and white. In Mannat’s case, it doesn’t seem that she judged or excused Rotu’s actions. Instead, her perspective appears to separate the act from the relationship, by recognising them as Vikrant’s parents, she isn’t validating what they did she is acknowledging a bond that for Vikrant, cannot be erased. Her line, you make relationships in name only suggests she is calling out Vikrant’s tendency to maintain relationships without emotional truth or accountability. It reflects her belief that relationships carry responsibility, not just labels. For Mannat, ignoring the wrongdoing isn’t the point, understanding how deeply these relationships shape Vikrant is. So, Mannat choose to look at the relationship rather than pass judgment on the act. That doesn’t mean she found the actions acceptable it means she prioritised emotional reality over moral reality. In such situations, it’s not about choosing right or wrong, but about navigating complexity with empathy and awareness of current situations.

Originally posted by: Bettyscar

Oooh man. Had to go back and rewatch and still couldn't decipher what's going on with him.

So Malla has built his emotional attachment to Yuvi and now Vikrant seems like the Neetu in that house 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Finally who is bunty, who is Yuvi ?

Our fears can rest for now as Vik's izzat will be safeguarded by Malla whenever Y closes the doors.🤪😝

I am guessing everyone already saw this…

https://youtu.be/sDX5A0IeK80

Originally posted by: Coolmeg

I am guessing everyone already saw this…

https://youtu.be/sDX5A0IeK80

Did Vik not notice that Yashika closed the door ?

Why can't people like Vik say NO on face. He is clearly feeling uncomfortable 😕

Watched the Bizasia IV... needless to say loved it...

One section I found interesting was the peek into how much everyone is invested in their characters. Not just Adnan and Ayesha but also people like Suwati and Rushad.

Adnans explanation of Vikrants behaviour towards RoTu in the past month got me teary eyed.

No wonder their affection looks real!!!!

For all the people working on this show and doing such hardwork, hope the show does many more episodes and explores further layers of storytelling

Originally posted by: Bettyscar

I think she never recovered from losing Vikrant. Probably what Ronnie was worried about when he helped hide the truth. It's probably taken her back to when she lost the initial Vikrant. Now that untreated trauma plus this loss has taken a toll.

I want to ask something. Just a thought that crossed my mind. When a parent does the unimaginable what's the right thing to do? Is there a right thing to do? Is there a right or wrong reaction? I'm wondering if Mannat made any judgement of RoTu's actions or to her bottomline was they are Vikrant's parents no matter the sin. In one of the bts i heard her saying to Vikrant you make relationships in name only. I'm not trying to judge the act itself. I'm just wondering if Mannat just looked at the relationship only and not what they have done.

Interesting question Betty...

bold... dont know if I can answer this well as I have not experienced it...

But I would like to look at differently... parents are human too and they can make mistakes too... the realization of the mistake and the behavioral correction is the one that matters I suppose... the question also is can we forgive our parents? or are we to assume they should always be right and be the ones to take tough calls...

I dont recall well so I am not sure if Mannat even knows who real vikrant saluja is or why Neetu crashed her car.... but purely from what was shown in the episode... Mannat has seen both sides of the story.... Viks panic attacks (more than anyone else if I may say)... Neetu's obsession/ love for Vik ... even DK agreeing to not let the secret be known to Vik.... on that level... everyone who has genuine concern for Vikrants health and wellbeing are on the same plane....

And Mannat saw and heard what Vish did....

From her POV.... Neetu might be wrong in drugging Vik... Mannat herself had confronted her and post Neetu's whitewash we are told Neetu herself destroyed the meds... as per the new narrative Neetu understands its a mistake and she has stopped doing it so Mannat has chosen to side with the lesser evil...

Vish on the other hand is continuously hurting Vik...

So I suppose Mannat might have judged Neetu initially but now that she sees Neetu's regret and repentance, she prefers to side with Neetu instead of Vish as she understands why Neetu did what she did... but thats not the case with Vish.

Originally posted by: Mona_HappyLife

Did Vik not notice that Yashika closed the door ?

Why can't people like Vik say NO on face. He is clearly feeling uncomfortable 😕

He is in a vulnerable or weak position, a zone he has been in before; he was previously unable to refuse or devalue or demean Malla, due to his acquiescent and empathetic nature, thinking her a victim, even though he had to bluntly reject her advances of SR, associated with pan masala times...