Originally posted by: asmitamohanty
Agreed..The Ani-Tejas confrontations were pure fire - every glare, every line delivery had a rhythm. Krushal as Aniruddha carried that simmering rage and possessiveness with remarkable restraint. His tone never felt overdone, and the emotion behind “haq” came from a real place of protectiveness and pain. That’s what made those scenes unforgettable. They had soul.
In contrast, the Aviraj portrayal feels like a bad imitation of intensity. The expressions are exaggerated, the popped eyes look comical instead of fierce, and there’s no emotional foundation behind the anger. It’s all surface-level dramatics with no weight...
Like You can always tell when an actor is “living” the part versus when he’s just “playing” it and sadly, Aviraj clearly falls in the latter category.😆😆... abb bhale hi Krushal khud kitna hi impressed kyun na ho apne performance se🤣
For me writing/scripting is key in the creative effort and no amount of “acting” can surmount or hide bad writing.in that sense, acting plays second fiddle to writing…
This is not to undermine an actor’s contribution… in a creative effort but all a great or good actor does in a bad enterprise is make the bad experience tolerable… and that is possible in a film of limited duration but nearly impossible in a medium like tv
Krushal as Ani worked or Hiba as Jhanak because the love story was set up so well… all the paraphernalia was built to egg the love story on and could create the canvas of expectations. Which is why even when the writer made many efforts to thwart the love story for continuing the charade, it kept the hope alive in the slimmest form as also the expectations that their love will fructify. ( they did not intend for the love story to fructify but their efforts earlier on had done the job for viewers to root for the pair) Ani and Jhanak’s gravitating to each other for the longest time kept up the slimmest hope. I very much doubt the rooting for the story would have happened if the writers had showed Ani involved with Arshi in any way….
My perspective is bad actors can ruin a good writing effort though surely there are some actors who can smell like roses amid the ruins but again that’s a medium thing too…it’s a rare thing for good actors to resurrect bad scripting.
I have seen Krushal only in one outing so while I think he has the chops but I won’t extol his efforts unless I see more of his work. As for Binddii, it’s such a weak premise that I wouldn’t waste my time evaluating his efforts in this outing…I thought earlier that Krushal may be gifted with discernment of scripting but his choice of Binddii as his outing after Jhanak makes me question his choices. After all what can be the graph of a character that is the pawn of a villainous character and will be moved only by blood ties alone? What’s there to discern or applaud in that?
while I haven’t seen a single scene of Binddii I can well imagine that any acting effort will incorporate a sense of exaggeration cos it is such a forgettable outline for a character.An actor’s sincerity will not enliven the graph.
.....all his previous Bengali show fans accepted his Anirudh wala role also, didn't they? Then khud dimaag lagaaye why his choice of Bindi is such a flop show....but ego and delusion itna bhara hua hai ismein thanks to his 4 fangirls, he will never get a reality check 
whenever I read all those flattery comments I feel same … did these people never saw any actors in Hindi show at all… they r acting like he is first guy they see acting 
1.5k