Originally posted by: Butterfly01
Coz Prarthana understood his feelings and Sona never did. Best example is that lunch scene. When Shiv left after taking a spoonful stating he’s not hungry, Sona just sat eating saying she’s hungry while Prats would’ve nagged him to eat…
Sona would’ve helped Shiv take the revenge never understanding that he’d be all the more broken after destroying his mother, but Prarthana understood that and tried to stop him from doing so and asked him to talk to his mother. Sonalika is materialistic while Prarthana is a realist, he himself said that he’s never seen somebody as pure a Prats. I believe this is the difference.
And love always needn’t be ‘first’ to have an impact. He might’ve been in relationships before/ loved someone else before but he’ll not be able to love anyone other than Prarthana now. I know I’m not making much sense but I hope you understand what I am trying to convey.
In my opinion they didn’t ruin Shivansh, rather they kept up with his character of a flawed anti hero. He’s no saint but after Prats he’s very much willing to become one.
@ red yes they kept anti-hero theme alive. He is flawed and we saw that when he made an impulsive decision to marry Prarthana. He did not think through anything. Consequences or impact at all. Now he cares for Prarthana but he did not in beginning. He did not once think he is ruining an innocent girls life. He wanted to show world he married a girl spend a night with here and let her go and just to hurt Ronak. So it will hurt his mom. he might have kicked Prarthana out if that food poisoning fiasco did not happen.
He is very flawed and he is anti hero. Yes I did not expect this but one thing I know is Shivansh does not seem to me like a guy who could be forced to marry a girl without his consent.
did he say he proposed her or she said that?
1.5k