Originally posted by: TintedBlossom
So now they’re telling us that Shivansh Sona have known each other for 7 years, dated for the last 5 and that he was the one who proposed. Apparently, he was in love with her, her dad made her realise it, she didn’t see it at first.
In short.. we thought she was stupid for mistaking his care and concern for a friend as love… but turns out, we were stupid for thinking that
And when she asks, did you mean it when you proposed during that function 5 years back, he actually has the audacity to reply, “Obviously, I meant it at that time.” 🤬
So basically, they now want us to believe these two were genuinely in love (which, btw, even Tanya implied today, "bhai tumhare saath pehle bahot khush rehte the, tumse kitna pyaar karte the") long before Prarthana came into the picture, meaning Prarthana is the third wheel here?
And Shivansh? He’s no victim. Not of abandonment issues, not of trust issues, not of any fear… nothing. He’s the culprit. He saw his future with Sona, proposed to her and would have happily married her.. if he hadn’t met his mom..
This is one of the many reasons for my outburst today.. See Nagpal is nowhere near as “skilled” as he thinks he is. Who on earth asked him to suddenly give us Shiv's detailed history with Sona? Why hand so much relevance to her character and their so-called love story when the show is in its final stretch? Why ruin Shivansh, butcher him beyond repair, all in the name of “closure”?! Absolute nonsense!
I can't believe that they are doing this.... going to this extent to make Sonalika and her actions relevant...
it's not just emotional frustration, it's intellectual betrayal by the writers. You’ve invested in a story built on emotional complexity, psychological depth, and a character whose silence screamed louder than any dialogue. And now, in the eleventh hour, they’re bulldozing it all for... what, manufactured closure for a character that never deserved center stage to begin with?
"He proposed to her"
Let’s humor this for a second. Say he did propose. Then everything we've seen of him since—his inability to trust, to connect, to love Prarthana fully even when he’s breaking apart inside—is pure performative nonsense? Was his pain just… dramatic garnish?
His arc only made sense if he’d never risked his heart before. If he was untouched, unscarred by love—because love never happened for him until Prarthana. That’s what made their dynamic so achingly real.
Now what? They want us to believe that Prarthana isn't the storm that shook him, but merely the girl he happened to marry because Sonalika exited stage left?
No. Absolutely not.
"He meant it at that time"
This line should be banned from all emotionally driven stories. “I meant it at that time” is the laziest, most cowardly way to retain sympathy while invalidating everything the current story stands for.
If Shivansh meant it, then:
His coldness toward Prarthana wasn’t fear, it was just… indifference.
His eventual surrender to her wasn’t growth, it was settling.
And his breakdowns, his apologies, his vulnerability—they were all hollow.
What does that make Prarthana? A rebound with good timing?
Are we seriously expected to root for a love where one would have happily married someone else if his mother hadn’t re-entered his life? If Sonalika hadn’t been absent, Prarthana wouldn’t exist in his story? That’s not just narrative injustice—that’s emotional treachery.....
This is not my Shivansh....and I am refusing to accept it... Nagpal needs to retire asap.....
Edited by asmitamohanty - 2 days ago
1.5k