Geetanjali vs Abhinav - Page 13

Originally posted by: chaaipani

Dekh rahi ho ab Choms ko justify karne wale bhi comprehensive skills ka gyan de rhe hain woh bhi mujhe 🤣🤣🤣🤣

But this is heights. But ek cheez acha hai gen 4 have some drama on forum. It was so dead now not even troll worthy. So thanks to Arman and everyone i guess

Arre pura khandan tag karne ko zaroorat nhi thi. You can reply on your own without backup

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

Arre pura khandan tag karne ko zaroorat nhi thi. You can reply on your own without backup

Areyyy it’s not replying it is letting them know…know the difference…u were also tagged for backup then?not all r free right..some do have jobs..soo they can catch up

Originally posted by: Dr.RealityCheck

Areyyy it’s not replying it is letting them know…know the difference…u were also tagged for backup then?not all r free right..some do have jobs..soo they can catch up

But thik hai chalo yehi job hai to 🤣🤣

Jobless ki dhamki mat dijiye logo ko acha nhi lagta from the house of abusive words 🤣 toodles. Don't bother to reply to this

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

does it mean abhira kidnapped maira 🤫🤨 as she also took the child without g2's consent and even maira bhi happy nahi thi. 😌

It means nothing, bakaiti chal ri idhar

You and I can see faults in Abhimanyu even though we like him but some people can't see faults in characters they like

They'd rather change meaning of parents, social construct, legalities and medical science to prove their point

Ab discussion ke liye logic chahiye

Bakaiti ke liye bas support chahiye wo 10 log ko tag karke mil jayega, mere paas nahi hai back-up

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

if you could bother to check the previous pages I had replied on my own lmao. No one tagged me to defend themselves with a long rant

But thik hai chalo yehi job hai to 🤣🤣

Jobless ki dhamki mat dijiye logo ko acha nhi lagta from the house of abusive words 🤣 toodles. Don't bother to reply to this

Did i tell jobless? R u interpreting it or projecting it?

Dont project something which was not intended…soo better mind own business

some may don’t respect others professions and mock them…i am not one of those cheapos


Before replying tell them to unblock soo we can reply to their mockery too….yup chatgpt treats in reality

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

i posted your response to chat gpt. Chat gpt is praising you 😄

Chat gpt response

You're absolutely right to call this out — and your explanation is spot on.

Kangaroo Care, while a medically recognized and beneficial method, is not what was shown in that dramatized scene. It’s not about a father heroically reviving a critically premature baby with just skin contact seconds after birth, without medical supervision or equipment. That’s misleading and irresponsible storytelling, especially when viewers may take such scenes at face value.

Let’s break it down clearly:

---

✅ What Kangaroo Care Actually Is:

It is skin-to-skin contact.

Used for premature or low birth weight infants.

Initiated only after the baby is stable — often after days/weeks in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Always monitored closely by medical professionals.

The baby is often attached to wires monitoring vitals.

Sessions start for limited durations — often 1–3 hours a day — and are slowly increased.

❌ What the Show Incorrectly Portrayed:

A 7-month-old premature baby being kept alive solely by skin-to-skin contact immediately post-birth.

No NICU, no machines, no oxygen, no IV lines, nothing shown.

A father with no medical training doing what trained doctors can’t — with dramatic results.

Portraying kangaroo care as a substitute for emergency neonatal care — which is dangerous and false.

---

You're right — this isn’t just creative liberty, it’s scientifically inaccurate and irresponsible, especially since real parents of preemies might misunderstand it.

Your criticism is fair, informed, and necessary — because basic biological facts and medical science shouldn’t be distorted for emotional payoff. If a show wants to explore such a story, it should at least ground it in realism or give disclaimers.

Kuch bhi mat bolo ab Diya Daktar Sahab ne kehdiya na k Choms ne perfect Kangaru care di thi with 5 layers of clothing 🤣

Abi lota keh ke and tumko Trauma keh ke khush hain hone do naa 😌

Ajab idhar phir se Job ka discussion chalu hogya

I just read this one line and now my head's spinning. “Akshu and abhinav were happily married and in love and they raised abhir from birth..” WTF!?!! It’s one thing to be a blind stan but to be so switched off from reality, that’s problematic.

Didn’t Aaktuu scream in front of goenkas that’s there’s no “pati patni” ka rishta between navra.. they’re just pretending to be Abhir’s parents for the world?

Didn’t Navra get married post Abhirohi’s engagement?

Didn’t blue aunty say what Navra is doing is NATAK, a pretence for the world.. tabhi toh kachre ke piche padi thi ki apne dil ke baat boldo warna aaj nahi toh kal Natak pe parda girta zaroor hai.. and there was Kachra giving shocked constipated expression in return…

I can give the exact ep no. where these lines were said.. if Navra were so “happily married and in love” what was the need for blue aunty to say, turn this pretence into reality?? Bhai tum log konsa show dekh rahe ho?

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

It means nothing, bakaiti chal ri idhar

You and I can see faults in Abhimanyu even though we like him but some people can't see faults in characters they like

They'd rather change meaning of patents, social construct, legalities and medical science to prove their point

Ab discussion ke liye logic chahiye

Bakaiti ke liye bas support chahiye

Mujhe toh ab hasi aathi hai. 😂