Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 21 - Page 94

Originally posted by: Mona_HappyLife

Is Vikrant a little kid ki usko aise baandh ke rakhengey 🤬🤬🤬

That's why it then becomes a frustration that the Aman truth has been parked and Malla is on a winning streak. Whichever way you look at it, Vikrant seems boxed in.

I regret watching this show, I was watching only for mankiv but dhur dhur Tak there is no mankiv. As Adan said we will get the same in the last episode i think so.

Originally posted by: Rdigest

3rd angle Villan is 99% of ITV, I signed up for ARS and her Murderous character

Was pondering over this topic since Malla was outed in front of Mannat and various discussions on different platforms about Mannat character

Some are having a hard time to digest there is a fl who is not going to sit and cry, will take matters into her own hands and bring Vikrant out of guilt and get her love back? What is wrong with this, aren't we tired of sacrificial lamb fl?

A group wants her to tell Vikrant the truth about Malla, but she shouldn't aim to get Vikrant's love ? Why so & Why are we so worried what society thinks? Are all rules applicable to good but none to evil ?

Why should Mannat suffer for Vikrant's trust issues and Malla's evil nature. Shouldn't this be Mannat's decision if she wants to pursue Vikrant after finding out the truth just like Vikrant has a right to decide if he wants to continue this marriage ?

Why are we expecting to see a suffering fl ? What is wrong if Mannat uses " sama dana veda danda" to fight evil or have we normalized female suffering so much, we cannot see a female character going all out for truth and for her love?

What is wrong if Mannat knowing the truth, wants to rattle Malla so she outs herself? In an attempt to do this she is taking some steps intentionally even when she knows Vikrant is angry, what is wrong with this? Wouldn't we expect Vikrant to do the same if the roles were reversed?

Is a wedding based on deceit and lies something which holds sanctity? Merko yeh bahut pareshaan kar Raha thaa , why audience , society want to place female characters on a pedestal to suffer. Only if the fl suffers they are true fl who can be role models, if so why? Why is Mannat not a role model as new age fl?

Originally posted by: Moor278

Colllluuuuuu....

For you

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMHrGh1yJfC/?igsh=dnY5ODBhMW10NjR1

Haye…. Mera dil!!

That stare at the end was killer!!

Classic papon!!!

Vikrant Interview. Maybe we can get perspective

https://youtu.be/SUmyeBBh-k8?si=r_aJqpPq3NADCUzP

Originally posted by: Rdigest

Was pondering over this topic since Malla was outed in front of Mannat and various discussions on different platforms about Mannat character

Some are having a hard time to digest there is a fl who is not going to sit and cry, will take matters into her own hands and bring Vikrant out of guilt and get her love back? What is wrong with this, aren't we tired of sacrificial lamb fl?

A group wants her to tell Vikrant the truth about Malla, but she shouldn't aim to get Vikrant's love ? Why so & Why are we so worried what society thinks? Are all rules applicable to good but none to evil ?

Why should Mannat suffer for Vikrant's trust issues and Malla's evil nature. Shouldn't this be Mannat's decision if she wants to pursue Vikrant after finding out the truth just like Vikrant has a right to decide if he wants to continue this marriage ?

Why are we expecting to see a suffering fl ? What is wrong if Mannat uses " sama dana veda danda" to fight evil or have we normalized female suffering so much, we cannot see a female character going all out for truth and for her love?

What is wrong if Mannat knowing the truth, wants to rattle Malla so she outs herself? In an attempt to do this she is taking some steps intentionally even when she knows Vikrant is angry, what is wrong with this? Wouldn't we expect Vikrant to do the same if the roles were reversed?

Is a wedding based on deceit and lies something which holds sanctity? Merko yeh bahut pareshaan kar Raha thaa , why audience , society want to place female characters on a pedestal to suffer. Only if the fl suffers they are true fl who can be role models, if so why? Why is Mannat not a role model as new age fl?

The only solace I get is when I think we are also audience!

High time mindsets changed even if it has to be stuffed into their ----.

Sick to the gills of self-sacrificing and forever sad-looking FLs who . accept everything meted out to them without the slightest whimper!

Originally posted by: Rdigest

Was pondering over this topic since Malla was outed in front of Mannat and various discussions on different platforms about Mannat character

Some are having a hard time to digest there is a fl who is not going to sit and cry, will take matters into her own hands and bring Vikrant out of guilt and get her love back? What is wrong with this, aren't we tired of sacrificial lamb fl?

A group wants her to tell Vikrant the truth about Malla, but she shouldn't aim to get Vikrant's love ? Why so & Why are we so worried what society thinks? Are all rules applicable to good but none to evil ?

Why should Mannat suffer for Vikrant's trust issues and Malla's evil nature. Shouldn't this be Mannat's decision if she wants to pursue Vikrant after finding out the truth just like Vikrant has a right to decide if he wants to continue this marriage ?

Why are we expecting to see a suffering fl ? What is wrong if Mannat uses " sama dana veda danda" to fight evil or have we normalized female suffering so much, we cannot see a female character going all out for truth and for her love?

What is wrong if Mannat knowing the truth, wants to rattle Malla so she outs herself? In an attempt to do this she is taking some steps intentionally even when she knows Vikrant is angry, what is wrong with this? Wouldn't we expect Vikrant to do the same if the roles were reversed?

Is a wedding based on deceit and lies something which holds sanctity? Merko yeh bahut pareshaan kar Raha thaa , why audience , society want to place female characters on a pedestal to suffer. Only if the fl suffers they are true fl who can be role models, if so why? Why is Mannat not a role model as new age fl?

My annoyance is more for Vikrant.

His dumbness and how clue less he has become. And Mainly Mannat being overly nice to him forgetting what he did before all that started. He is trapped yes, may be needs help, yes , but the trust issue he has w her is undeniable and glaring hope she points that and tell him and remind him that he is in this marriage coz if his own stupid plan to make her jealous.

And The moment he picked up that glass to drink again, he lost some sympathy from me.

Also they need to tone him down w Mannat, make him keep mum to all including Mannat to show he is drowning in pain but this one sided blaming on Mannat incident after incident while his own family is proven wrong is stupid onesided writing.

All this including the rant I posted the otherday- hes complete lack pf curiosity over how come Mannat’s like is so adventurous. Her getting attacked all the time, her getting wrongly accused by family all the time n proven wrong and still he keeps doing that again n again. Especially knowing how much his fam hates her.

Initially it made sense one or two incidents- but now it does not. Not to me.


For me more than FL not being sacrificial it is about Man they are fighting for. These man are shown powerful intelligent business man bla bla but then have to be ‘rescued’ by FLs is where my annoyance is. Do FLs deserve such dumbheads who drop them like hot potato as something goes wrong n there is no trust what so ever.

Originally posted by: Padmajaan

The only solace I get is when I think we are also audience!

High time mindsets changed even if it has to be stuffed into their ----.

Sick to the gills of self-sacrificing and forever sad-looking FLs who . accept everything meted out to them without the slightest whimper!

Yup, so many accounts calling Mannat all kind of names, knowing fully well Vikrant is a victim and Malla deceived her and Vikrant , snatched their love for her selfish motives is appalling. Why should Mannat suffer the loss of her love just cause a charade of a wedding (I am leaving Vikrant out since he is not why aware)

This is the same mentality Malla and ARS have. They were confident about the societal norms and so their confidence in revealing all the truth to Mannat. This is what shocked them, Mannat doesn't care for societal norms or a piece of paper, that this cannot dictate their life and push them into a life of sorrow without each other

I am honestly loving this Mannat ❤️