Originally posted by: ItvDrama
Is it intentional or unintentional decision to reverse the roles in this season where the ML, who has an uncanny characteristic resemblance to S3 FL, to hide the child’s existence from the mother for 6 years. Are they trying to see if the roles were reversed, how would the audience of both seasons react? Are they trying to see if S3 fans will support Abhira because she has been deprived of her child’s early childhood by a man who already deprived her of the chance to see her first child at least once? And will the S4 audience be able to support Armaan’s decision to separate the child from a mother due to his “childhood psychological trauma” and finding a replacement mother for his child?? Interesting strategy to keep both the season audiences engaged…
Yes it seems intentional but I don't know if it will work because I don't think s3 manra fans will ever support Abhira (although some may feel occasional pangs of sympathy I suppose) and neither will s4 fans support this kidnapping by Armaan, it's just too extreme.
Akshu's situation was different, she was divorced and yet tried to tell manyu but was rebuffed by him. Also he wasn't exactly faultless in that situation. But what was Ab's mistake that Ar felt justified to go to such extreme lengths and yet feels no sense of guilt? It is truly shocking to the extent that they have ruined Armaan.
Edited by MaBelle - 2 months ago
4