One thing i have noticed is: Dharmic religions that originated from india from same roots have generally become more peaceful and progressive with each evolution starting from Sanatan to Buddhism, Jainism, modern Hinduism and Sikhism.
In contrast, Abrahmic religions, especially those from the Middle East, seem to have regressed with each iteration almost going backwards to the Stone Age. For example, from Judaism to Christianity to Islam. Christianity improved over time due to reform movements but Islam remains largely stuck in its old, orthodox, and highly regressive practices.
Overall Dharmic religions and even East Asian ones like Shintoism and Taoism tend to be far more peaceful and balanced compared to those that emerged in the Middle East.
No hate to any religion but this is my pure opinion about Abrahmic vs Dharmic religions.
1.4k