GHKPM New Season EDT #5 - Page 120

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

Till date nobody knows which stream she studied in, it wasn't disclosed in the show cunningly by Ganja makers to juggle with her stream nicely. Lagta hai ye raaz bi usike saath chala jaayega

Ishaan taught her how to make "amrit chai" like her beloved Pakhu kaku & also how to poke one's nose in everybody's business & make false interpretations Yes, Ishaan was her professor

Originally posted by: Tanvi_vault

If they bring Ishaan back in Ghum, I’ll be jumping like crazy! I first started watching Ghum only because of Ishu.Even if Ganja PH brings him back through some illogical twist and full masala I won’t complain!

It could be a much needed respite for Shakti & Ishvi fans, but I don't think a veteran like Shakti Arora would ever trust this PH again in his life because the way he was disrespectfully evicted, so I don't think Shakti would ever agree to come back to Ghum

Originally posted by: Randomlurker

Anyways Itv is never meant to reflect realism 🤡It's made for drama, and escapism. So yeah, I’ll take a pseudo-strong, over-the-top fl's who brings some masala over a "realistic" dull lead. At least I’ll be entertained — whether I’m loving it or laughing at it.

Entertainment isn’t supposed to be deep Anyways. Like watch it and move on to next show. ✌🏻🫂🫥🫥

Everybody knows it's no documentary & a fictional drama meant for escapism, so why not label them as "unrealistic dramatic characters" rather than correlating FLs as ones remotely portraying strong feminist values because their characterization is inconsistent & flip-flop because of TRPs and not due to any critical thinking & analytical writing ITV stories & FLs are already boring & not even dramatic anymore

Instead of hailing them as best & strong characters esp Ganja show's characters, we should continue calling them inconsistent characters, not even flawed, we all know there have been better written characters to already grace ITV. Let alone being best-written ,Ganja characters are not even good-written characters, because there's no writing involved in Ghum first of all, everything is blatant copy-paste

Jab aisi without head & tail writing hogi toh vaisi hi headless chickens kinda characters honge, hence audience would stop lapping up clownish writing & remotely enjoy any kind of tomfoolery they throw at us.

However, one thing I would agree is Ghum did a huge blunder by bringing back Reeva untimely in the show, otherwise SAKK track did good for the show commercially. Ganja's own creativity by bringing Reeva back & deviating from Mohor/Swabhimaan/SAKK proved to be the downfall for S2

Anyway, to each its own, PEACE OUT!!

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

MAHANTA SYNDROME, farzi strong & besht character hai aaj ki FLs
So much for being a strong woman, mujhe to rona hi aagaya.

Merely slapping here & there for any inconvenience doesn't tick the checkboxes of a strong woman or even fulfill the criteria for it

Liking & disliking an ITV character is all well & good but proclaiming ITV FLs as some inspirational character & strong personality inspiring feminism declaring them as some oscar-worthy , it is another joke It's better to watch them as an entertainment & not associating any real life feminist qualities with them., which there aren't clearly any.
I think we have learnt incomplete & wrong qualities of a strong woman, need new dictionary for it ITV se power, strength and feminism se learning karne lage toh hogaya bedagarak. We need to unlearn a lot about these ITV characters

Haaye!! kya karun never seen such a strong woman in my life, oops!! At best, she is a majboor character- majboor by haalat & majboor by recurring characters

Even in today times if people think merely slapping and hitting others is the definition of being "STRONG" then may be we should change the definition of strong and fierce.

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

Even in today times if people think merely slapping and hitting others is the definition of being "STRONG" then may be we should change the definition of strong and fierce.

I would like to add so called strong character savi used to take all insults silently from her first husband's gf's mother & her 1st husband's family . Her husband plays holi with his lover with his whole family encouraging it. Still she will be standing there giving puppy eyes wanting validation. She forget her so called goals, studies which is why her professor husband "had to slap" her because she was declaring love like a teenager instead of concentrating on her career.

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

I would like to add so called strong character savi used to take all insults silently from her first husband's gf's mother & her 1st husband's family . Her husband plays holi with his lover with his whole family encouraging it. Still she will be standing there giving puppy eyes wanting validation. She forget her so called goals, studies which is why her professor husband "had to slap" her because she was declaring love like a teenager instead of concentrating on her career.

Ohh, WOW!! so much for being called the besht & strong character...😱At least, her mother never used to take all of that crap even in deal marriage for a long time. Sai was never a people-pleaser but her daughter was one

Savi is as much as of a besht & strong character as Upma is the besht FL...😍Upma bhi slap-slup deti hai, but goes back to square one immediately

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

Ohh, WOW!! so much for being called the besht & strong character...😱At least, her mother never used to take all of that crap even in deal marriage for a long time. Sai was never a people-pleaser but her daughter was one

Savi is as much as of a besht & strong character as Upma is the besht FL...😍Upma bhi slap-slup deti hai, but goes back to square one immediately

Sai disappointed me by being doormat to virat at the end.

But she had dignity in her deal marriage phase. She didn't accept her husband for long time because she thought he is still hung up on his ex.

While her daughter loved her professor husband despite him parading his gf openly. She even confessed without hesitation despite knowing that man has a gf.

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

Everybody knows it's no documentary & a fictional drama meant for escapism, so why not label them as "unrealistic dramatic characters" rather than correlating FLs as ones remotely portraying strong feminist values because their characterization is inconsistent & flip-flop because of TRPs and not due to any critical thinking & analytical writing ITV stories & FLs are already boring & not even dramatic anymore

Instead of hailing them as best & strong characters esp Ganja show's characters, we should continue calling them inconsistent characters, not even flawed, we all know there have been better written characters to already grace ITV. Let alone being best-written ,Ganja characters are not even good-written characters, because there's no writing involved in Ghum first of all, everything is blatant copy-paste

Jab aisi without head & tail writing hogi toh vaisi hi headless chickens kinda characters honge, hence audience would stop lapping up clownish writing & remotely enjoy any kind of tomfoolery they throw at us.

However, one thing I would agree is Ghum did a huge blunder by bringing back Reeva untimely in the show, otherwise SAKK track did good for the show commercially. Ganja's own creativity by bringing Reeva back & deviating from Mohor/Swabhimaan/SAKK proved to be the downfall for S2

Anyway, to each its own, PEACE OUT!!

Lmao, first of all, I never said she's some ultra-strong feminist queen who inspires my life decisions. I simply said I miss what she used to be before her character got diluted, before she fell for Ishan and completely forgot her own goals and identity. That doesn’t mean I see her as some real-life role model smh. “Strong” means different things to different people. For some, it’s physical power. For others, it’s emotional control, vulnerability, or just having a spine. There’s no universal definition. And I’m not some woke thesis-writing feminism expert trying to dissect the anatomy of a well-written character. I’m just a viewer who wants some entertainment.

Yeah agree though, characters in Ghum could be written way better But I think Itv was like that. Even the so-called “elite” or “iconic” shows were full of melodrama, and inconsistencies. Ig People watched them because they were entertaining, not perfect.

Anyways, we both brought our perspectives to the table, and we’re both valid in our own way. Peace out drink water stay hydrated ✌🏻👍🏻

Originally posted by: Randomlurker

Yup, everyone knows it’s not a documentary — that’s the whole point. It’s fictional drama, meant for mass consumption, escapism, and entertainment. And if someone expect nuanced writing from a daily soap built on trp pressure and 7-day telecasts, maybe we all watching the wrong genre.

Lmao, first of all, I never said she's some ultra-strong feminist queen who inspires my life decisions. I simply said I miss what she used to be before her character got diluted, before she fell for Ishan and completely forgot her own goals and identity. That doesn’t mean I see her as some real-life role model smh. “Strong” means different things to different people. For some, it’s physical power. For others, it’s emotional control, vulnerability, or just having a spine. There’s no universal definition. And I’m not some woke thesis-writing feminism expert trying to dissect the anatomy of a well-written character. I’m just a viewer who wants some entertainment.

Yeah agree though, characters in Ghum could be written way better But I think Itv was like that. Even the so-called “elite” or “iconic” shows were full of melodrama, and inconsistencies. Ig People watched them because they were entertaining, not perfect.

Anyways, we both brought our perspectives to the table, and we’re both valid in our own way. Peace out drink water stay hydrated ✌🏻👍🏻

@ bold:- And neither it was directed to you specifically, I know you were talking about how things got diluted post- Reeva's entry, and how things could be along with your talks about strong characters , it was a general statement for all the ones who indeed consider these inconsistent ITV characters as some ultra-strong & best feminist queens. but reality is they're not even written rationally & actually deviate anytime becz of TRPs. They are glorified at the expense of/bali of other characters

LOL!! Nobody expects the writing of these cartoonish shows to be nuanced, it's a no brainer, I, toh at least don't, so at the same time people shouldn't even get possessive, sad or offended when these clown shows are rightfully getting roasted, trolled & treated as meme-material (again not talking about you or anybody, specifically)

Also, excessive show of physical power of adults onto the ones who're faultless due to misunderstanding , in the name of disciplining them & humiliating others' self-esteem isn't some strength of a character but borderline violence and abusive, and, I sadly neither endorse or like such stupidity.
Ganja PH has made slapping a normal thing & physical violence by women into some medal winning contest & tashanbaaji. Just reverse the gender & imagine a woman getting slapped for their dumbness and bamn the uproar, it would be then considered as the most vile thing in the world & jung ka ailan. I don't prefer any gender getting slapped like that, except criminals & terrorists. There are 10 thousand ways to show a strong/angry women but itv writers are too dumb/ non creative and the audience has also given moral validity to this in their mind. 2 non-criminal adults slapping each other is too insane and pretty much barbaric. Anyway, to each its own

Also, maine toh bhai aajtak kisi bhi ITV shows & characters keliye iconic & elite use kiya nahi, even randomly, for the sake of preserving the weightage of these words. Garima hai inn words ka bhai, which I won't waste on trash. Inn words ke weightage halka nahi karna chahti by randomly using it.

I, too, know the functioning of troll-worthy ITV shows, so I keep it like that....Yeah, indeed. PEACE OUT!!

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

All these drama could have been avoided if they showed savi rajat has a daughter biological I mean who looks like savi. They could have given excuse the parents are dead or missing that's what drives her ips journey

But nope these folks thrive on negative drama.

But in that case, TejNeil story is happening in 2047 - even if this biological Savi humshakal daughter passed upsc exams in 1st attempt, she would be at least 22 🙋🏻‍♀️

Isme bhi logic kaha hai?!