Armaan deserved it for doing the same to Daksh/Ruhaan - Page 8

Originally posted by: ThukkadRajaShah

I don't have an ounce of sympathy for this armaan and abheera. I have sympathy only for shivani.

I don't have sympathy for anyone, Shivani is a new character so she is nice now, they'll turn her around when they need TRPs, no character is consistent so I don't attach my feelings with anyone

Originally posted by: Debospeaks

Maana Abhir's mom was terrible but why didn't his multi millionaire family and specially his grandmother who was ready to go to SC for his custody never bothered to look for him???? Didn't they tried to collect their son's mortal remains????

Naam bade darshan chhote … usne Raste ki Sasti ko bhi 🗑️ me fenk Diya to hawk her wares .. Ab woh ek 🪑 hai PH mein

BAs thode din mein 🪵 ki tarah 🔥 use ho jayegi

Originally posted by: Aadi04

Wow I love it .. thank you for expressing it so well ❤️

You're welcome, Aadi.

Originally posted by: Krinya

where is the bias here ?

the way you described armans delimma , is exactly what and why vidya did what she did 30 yrs ago. That's what this topic is about .

Vidya did what she did out of love for madhav , out of fear that her marriage will fall apart. Ever persistent kaveri kept pursuing her into believing that this is the only way she can save her marriage. Once the lie was out she held onto it bec she wanted to save her marriage & her relationship , probably rohit also . Fear makes people do desperate things . Why is vidya an exception ? May be 30 yrs down the line , daksh would question him & he will cry like vidya , if at all abhir didn't reveal the truth .the actual Hypocrisy lies here. We try to relate to the leads at extreme levels but they're just ordinary , like sab ek thali ke chatte batte.

So why can't arman understand vidya , instead , lecture her about sach jhoot , in the same situation he acted the same way as vidya ? Where vidya was 30 yrs ago , he was there today , been there done that , but he pins it on vidya , and made it sound like he was an innocent soul while she's a witch .

I'm not defending vidya kaveri and I'm not blaming arman. Just to say .

And all this he was made to feel sautela in his house & kaveri vidya toyed with him is all valid ..he should've questioned them much earlier , shivani or no shivani , and when she gave him shrap

Your point about Armaan and Vidya being in similar situations is fair, but the key difference lies in their intent, the choices they had, and how their actions affected others.

1. Intent & Power Dynamics

Vidya’s decision to hide the truth was rooted in personal fear—fear of losing Madhav, fear of her marriage falling apart, and pressure from Kaveri. She manipulated a situation to secure her own place in the family, but in doing so, she deeply hurt an innocent child (Armaan).

Armaan, on the other hand, also hid the truth—but his intent wasn’t self-preservation. His choice was about protecting Abhira. He knew she had lost her baby, and revealing the truth immediately could have shattered her. He acted out of love and concern for her emotional well-being, not to secure his own position in her life.

So, while both lied, Vidya’s lie was self-serving, while Armaan’s was meant to protect someone else (Abhira). That’s the fundamental difference.

2. Impact of Their Choices

Vidya’s decision to lie affected Armaan’s entire childhood. He grew up feeling like an outsider, constantly reminded that he was ‘sautela.’ She allowed this to happen, choosing to prioritize her own security over his emotional well-being. Even after having her own biological son, Rohit, she never truly made Armaan feel like an equal part of the family.

Armaan’s decision to hide Daksh’s true identity, however, was short-term (not that it was upto him considering Abhira exposed the truth). He wasn’t trying to manipulate Abhira but rather shield her from pain at a vulnerable moment. His choice did have consequences, but the scale of harm is different. He didn’t create a life-altering identity crisis for someone in the way Vidya did for him.

If Armaan and Abhira had raised Daksh for 30 years, even after having their own biological child later, they wouldn’t have treated him as ‘sautela’ or made him feel like an outsider. The foundation of their parenting wouldn’t have been built on favoritism or insecurity the way Vidya’s was. While Abhira would have been devastated upon learning the truth, the love and care she gave Daksh would have remained unchanged. The difference is that Vidya allowed family politics and her own fears to dictate her treatment of Armaan, whereas Armaan and Abhira’s love for Daksh wouldn’t have been conditional.

3. Why Armaan Can’t ‘Understand’ Vidya

The answer lies in the aftermath of their lies.

When Vidya’s lie was exposed, she never truly took responsibility. She justified her actions, expecting Armaan to understand why she did it. Instead of apologizing for the pain she caused, she defended herself, making it seem like she had no choice. Her focus was on her own struggles, not on the hurt she inflicted on Armaan.

Armaan, on the other hand, did acknowledge his mistakes when the truth about Daksh came out. He didn’t try to justify himself or shift blame—he faced the consequences head-on. Abhira, rightfully furious, left him, and instead of making excuses, he asked for forgiveness. The key difference here is that Armaan didn’t try to downplay Abhira’s pain the way Vidya did with him. He accepted her anger, understanding that he had broken her trust.

This is why Armaan isn’t a hypocrite. He made a terrible mistake, but unlike Vidya, he owned up to it instead of expecting immediate understanding or forgiveness.

4. Is Armaan Still Wrong? Yes.

Just because his lie came from a place of love doesn’t make it right. He made a choice for Abhira that wasn’t his to make. No matter his intentions, the truth did hurt her and Ruhi. But his situation isn’t identical to Vidya’s—his lie was for someone else’s emotional well-being, whereas Vidya’s was for her own security.

That’s the difference. It’s not about saying "Vidya is right, Armaan is wrong." It’s about understanding the shades of grey in their actions.

Conclusion – Is Armaan a Hypocrite?

If Armaan justifies his own lie while condemning Vidya for hers, then yes, he would be a hypocrite. But if he acknowledges that both of them made grave mistakes and holds himself accountable, then his anger toward Vidya stems from deep emotional wounds rather than hypocrisy.

The real difference lies in their response once the truth was exposed. Vidya never truly took responsibility—she justified her actions and expected Armaan to understand. She never fully acknowledged the emotional damage she caused. Armaan, however, faced the consequences of his deception, accepted Abhira’s anger, and asked for forgiveness.

Originally posted by: Debospeaks

Why are leads haters still watching the show is the biggest question...Its almost 1.5 years now!!!!!

Seriously! 1.5 years of watching something they ‘hate’—that’s some next-level dedication. We should take notes on loyalty from them!

Originally posted by: Debospeaks

If that is the scenario, then the whole lot was a disgrace in the name of family.... Why to feel bad for them???

Abhir wanted to inform others as akshara's phone is switch off but the boy had no contact information. Even if they came to know later, with a landslide happening they might only get the information of abhimanyu and abhir's death as there is death list including their names. If Ak had tried to claim the bodies atleast of her son she would have known about him being alive.

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

But who will go after Abhir from Birla house? Unless Manjari is a vampire like Goenkas, what resources would she have without her son who was only earning member and frankly only member of her family?

One by one most members of Birla families died and Abhimanyu was a stupid man who left his old mother for that witch and brat and what happened? He died

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Ruhi is not an innocent victim when her child was taken away from her but Armaan is innocent victim who was pressurized by his brother

If you want to defend, at least be consistent. Otherwise, just admit you’re biased and move on.

I swear, people do selective reading whenever it suits them. I clearly said Ruhi didn’t deserve what happened to her, but that doesn’t mean she had no hand in the situation. Are you seriously justifying her actions—listening to aunties and running to some baba to find out the gender of her baby when she was nine months pregnant? That was reckless. But despite that, she didn’t deserve to be kept away from her child, and she definitely didn’t deserve a husband like Rohit, who straight-up gave away their baby just because he couldn’t handle parenting alone.

As for Armaan, yes, he was pressurized initially, but everything that followed was his own choice because he didn’t want to lose Abhira. I never justified his actions either—wrong is wrong. He hurt both Abhira and Ruhi, and I never claimed he was an innocent victim of his brother’s actions. Maybe try reading the actual post before jumping to conclusions?

Originally posted by: theromanticcrap

I swear, people do selective reading whenever it suits them. I clearly said Ruhi didn’t deserve what happened to her, but that doesn’t mean she had no hand in the situation. Are you seriously justifying her actions—listening to aunties and running to some baba to find out the gender of her baby when she was nine months pregnant? That was reckless. But despite that, she didn’t deserve to be kept away from her child, and she definitely didn’t deserve a husband like Rohit, who straight-up gave away their baby just because he couldn’t handle parenting alone.

As for Armaan, yes, he was pressurized initially, but everything that followed was his own choice because he didn’t want to lose Abhira. I never justified his actions either—wrong is wrong. He hurt both Abhira and Ruhi, and I never claimed he was an innocent victim of his brother’s actions. Maybe try reading the actual post before jumping to conclusions?

Maybe read your own replies then you wouldn't have to contradict yourself, anyways, I have accepted you are biased and have moved on from you

How can a 35 years old man can be pressurised to do anything against his will ? I mean come on that man literally said No to Ruhi on alter even when she was begging him so he could have strictly said No to Rohit had his intentions were noble..If Rohit forced him,Armaan accepted that baby..Armaan was playing happy family with that baby even when that baby was hungry n ruhi was crying for her baby yet he had no remorse of that so why is he playing victim now ? You reap what u sow..