Armaan deserved it for doing the same to Daksh/Ruhaan - Page 6

Originally posted by: Aadi04

Ironically the mistakes made by Rohit of not confessing his role in giving Daksh to Abhira , giiving money to nurse ( he had done it in good faith ) but he should have eventually owned up to his part to Abhira and Ruhi if not the entire family

This mistake has led to exposure of his mother in a bigger crime. If Abhira had not stayed separately from Armaan .. she would not have met RK .

Even if she had it would have been like hi and bye . . Shivani was discovered .. because of the RK connection . Abhira always suspected Kaveri to be behind this .. even Madhav had a fair hunch .. but Vidya being the silent conspirator was the big surprise

Whatever happens.. we think it’s terrible.. what Armaan did to Ruhi was terrible but the repentance made him get back his mother

Rohit’s mistake was definitely a catalyst, but at the end of the day, the real issue wasn’t just his silence—it was the deeply buried secrets within the Poddar family. Even if he had confessed earlier, would it have stopped the truth from coming out? Maybe it would have changed the way things unraveled, but Shivani’s past and Vidya’s betrayal were bound to surface eventually.

Abhira meeting RK was a game-changer, but I wouldn’t say her staying with Armaan would have completely prevented it. Fate has a way of bringing people together when the time is right. Even if she had only met RK in passing, who’s to say that small interaction wouldn’t have led her down the same path of discovery? Shivani’s past was waiting to be found—Abhira just became the bridge to it.

As for Armaan, his treatment of Ruhi was terrible, no doubt, but his redemption arc wasn’t just about repentance—it was about him finally facing his past and the family he was shaped by. Getting his mother back wasn’t a reward for his suffering, but rather a consequence of him confronting the truth. And in a way, everyone—Rohit, Abhira, even RK—played a part in breaking the cycle of deception that Kaveri and Vidya had kept alive for so long.

Originally posted by: shalu1786

Why people are having problem when the mistakes of leads are pointed out. No one saying rohit is right in bacha swap track. But why can't people accept armaan is also not right here. Rohit gave the baby and armaan took it, so how come Rohit wrong, while armaan right. Armaan is not a baby here, he is a 30+ adult, sane man and a lawyer who knows swapping baby is a crime. None is responsible for his actions not even Rohit. Armaan can very well say no, or make Rohit understand when he gave the kid. Even if Rohit gave kid to abhira as bsp, armaan can tell the truth to rest of the family members and later tell abhira the truth. But he didn't.

For me rohit and armaan are equally guilty here. I won't give rohit the excuse of he was broken after ruhi fell into the coma just like I won't give armaan the excuse of worrying about abhira and all.

Who supported Armaan during baby swap track? Armaan was completely wrong and an accomplice to what Rohit did. But child Armaan deserved to be sent to orphanage by his dadisa, he deserved to fear in darkness asking about his real mother, he deserved to be indebted by the people who separated him from his mother, he deserves 30 years of separation form his real mother and debt towards the family towards the stepmom who accepted a supposed motherless child, because after 30 years adult Armaan will be separating a mother from her child for months (which obviously can't be justified), how logical it is?

Originally posted by: inlieu

This is a glaring mistake. The person most affected other than Armaan, is Madhav. His marriage to Vidya isn't even valid and besides nearly collapsing when he first saw Shivaani, we don't see any interactions between them. I know he has been quiet for many years to put up with the circus at home but now is the time for him to speak. I get it that he wants to let Armaan make his own decision and not influence or pressure him, but he has been severely wronged and betrayed by Kaveri and Vidya. He can't just live in the same house, can he? Why doesn't he just leave with Armaan and Abhira? He left with Abhira in the past when he took a stand for her, so why not now?

One of the issues we've seen is how Armaan and his father weren't that close over the years because he felt that Madhav had wronged Vidya. Now that misunderstanding of his has been cleared up, and he even mentioned that. So I hope we can get more father-son scenes - they are usually gold and very nice to watch. Madhav has known all these years that he's a lower priority in Armaan's life but he's always tried to guide his son the right way. Now I hope he takes on a more prominent role in Armaan's life. It parallels Kartik finally getting close to Manish and how after so many years they started to spend more time and get to know each other more. I really hope we get more emotional scenes between them, especially right now when Armaan realizes that his father was betrayed and traumatized after losing Shivani and Armaan in one go during the accident. Poor guy... I don't think he's going to care much about Vidya or respect her anymore, and will go back to treating her like a stranger. She deserves it.

Karma isn’t some instant reaction button—it’s not like pressing a switch and getting results immediately. It plays the long game. It’s about actions and consequences that unfold over time, often in ways no one expects.

Now, if we talk about Vidya, she separated a mother from her child, and lo and behold, years later, she finds herself in a situation where her son and daughter-in-law are separated from their child. That? That’s karma. A direct cause-and-effect. But blaming Armaan for that? Now that’s just stretching logic to fit an agenda.

Armaan didn’t wake up one day and decide, “Oh, let me deceive Ruhi for fun.” He did what he did out of love for Abhira, out of fear, and because his ever-persistent brother kept pushing him into the situation. Once the lie was out there, he held onto it—not because he enjoyed it, but because he knew the truth would shatter Abhira, and possibly, their entire relationship. Fear makes people do desperate things, and Armaan was no exception.

What happened to Ruhi, unfortunate as it was, didn’t just come out of nowhere or happen decades later as some delayed karmic punishment—it unfolded in the present, shaped by her own choices. Let’s not pretend Ruhi was some innocent victim in all of this. She wished ill for Abhira’s unborn baby, barely cared for her own child while pregnant, and was more concerned about having a son than embracing motherhood itself. That’s hardly the profile of a blameless, wronged woman. Actions have consequences, and Ruhi wasn’t just a casualty of fate—she played an active role in shaping her own downfall. Again, that doesn’t mean I’m excusing Armaan or Rohit’s actions. Ruhi should never have been separated from her child—especially considering the impact on her baby.

Thirty years is a long time—long enough that trying to pin it on Armaan's karma is like blaming the weather today on what you ate for breakfast a month ago. The truth had to come out, and it did. It wasn’t karma coming for Armaan; it was simply the weight of long-buried lies finally collapsing in on themselves. If anything, Armaan and Rohit unknowingly set the final gears in motion to expose the decades of deception spun by Vidya and Kaveri.

So no, just because you don’t like Armaan doesn’t mean he’s responsible for every bad thing happening in the universe. If the stock market crashes tomorrow, are you going to blame Armaan for that too? Before flinging the word "karma" around like it’s a buzzword, at least understand what it actually means.

And let’s not even start on the hypocrisy in the fandom. People drag characters through the mud, talk endless crap about them, and then conveniently twist their arguments when it comes to defending their favorites. Suddenly, their faves being "weakly written" is an excuse for every questionable action, but when it comes to characters they dislike, it's all about "accountability" and "writing flaws."

Abhira is called out for not doing X or Y, but Ruhi? Oh no, everything she does—good, bad, or terrible—is just because she’s “weakly written.” Funny how that works. Is Abhira not a weakly written character too? And if we’re going there, so are Armaan and Rohit. Every character in this generation has been inconsistently written, but the mental gymnastics some fans do to defend one while crucifying the other is truly next-level.

At this point, it's not even about storytelling—it's about selective outrage. The double standards are ridiculous. If you want to criticize, do it fairly. If you want to defend, at least be consistent. Otherwise, just admit you’re biased and move on.

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

Who supported Armaan during baby swap track? Armaan was completely wrong and an accomplice to what Rohit did. But child Armaan deserved to be sent to orphanage by his dadisa, he deserved to fear in darkness asking about his real mother, he deserved to be indebted by the people who separated him from his mother, he deserves 30 years of separation form his real mother and debt towards the family towards the stepmom who accepted a supposed motherless child, because after 30 years adult Armaan will be separating a mother from her child for months (which obviously can't be justified), how logical it is?

Dadisa is wrong here,but vidhya how can she become wrong in rishaverse. Because paalnewala is right in rishta not the real parent. It is same in the case of a just born baby or a 6year old or 30+adult.

Originally posted by: Indira1211

I don’t know how Madhav can still stay with vidya after her huge betrayal. Their whole marriage was based on a lie..by kaveri and vidya. He’s should just divorce that chudail and then dkp,should kill her off. And we’ll be saved by her horrendous facial acrobatics 😂

But is his marriage valid legally .. we see many instances in celebrities.. since we don’t get sneak peak in commoners life we don’t know

So and so film star is married to someone .. and then has been living in a second marriage for years .. legally only the first wife has any status

Death certificate given to Madhav was forged ..

He is a policeman.. he knows his mother was aware of Shivani being alive and orchestrated the marriage to Vidya

Any ways how can you stop a man from leaving you in a relationship if he’s not interested . Madhav was never interested in Vidya .. she played on the victim card too much after Rohit was declared dead .. thanks to Abhira some companionship and love was kindled

I feel some plot points of Madhav taking a transfer as Shivani / Armaan refuse to keep him with them .. can be considered.

and they should now show Sanjay Bansal having an affair with another woman .. and plotting to take over Poddar firm

So that Kaveri sees the whole house of cards falling down

Originally posted by: theromanticcrap

Armaan didn’t wake up one day and decide, “Oh, let me deceive Ruhi for fun.” He did what he did out of love for Abhira, out of fear, and because his ever-persistent brother kept pushing him into the situation. Once the lie was out there, he held onto it—not because he enjoyed it, but because he knew the truth would shatter Abhira, and possibly, their entire relationship. Fear makes people do desperate things, and Armaan was no exception.

where is the bias here ?

the way you described armans delimma , is exactly what and why vidya did what she did 30 yrs ago. That's what this topic is about .

Vidya did what she did out of love for madhav , out of fear that her marriage will fall apart. Ever persistent kaveri kept pursuing her into believing that this is the only way she can save her marriage. Once the lie was out she held onto it bec she wanted to save her marriage & her relationship , probably rohit also . Fear makes people do desperate things . Why is vidya an exception ? May be 30 yrs down the line , daksh would question him & he will cry like vidya , if at all abhir didn't reveal the truth .the actual Hypocrisy lies here. We try to relate to the leads at extreme levels but they're just ordinary , like sab ek thali ke chatte batte.

So why can't arman understand vidya , instead , lecture her about sach jhoot , in the same situation he acted the same way as vidya ? Where vidya was 30 yrs ago , he was there today , been there done that , but he pins it on vidya , and made it sound like he was an innocent soul while she's a witch .

I'm not defending vidya kaveri and I'm not blaming arman. Just to say .

And all this he was made to feel sautela in his house & kaveri vidya toyed with him is all valid ..he should've questioned them much earlier , shivani or no shivani , and when she gave him shrap

Originally posted by: theromanticcrap

Karma isn’t some instant reaction button—it’s not like pressing a switch and getting results immediately. It plays the long game. It’s about actions and consequences that unfold over time, often in ways no one expects.

Now, if we talk about Vidya, she separated a mother from her child, and lo and behold, years later, she finds herself in a situation where her son and daughter-in-law are separated from their child. That? That’s karma. A direct cause-and-effect. But blaming Armaan for that? Now that’s just stretching logic to fit an agenda.

Armaan didn’t wake up one day and decide, “Oh, let me deceive Ruhi for fun.” He did what he did out of love for Abhira, out of fear, and because his ever-persistent brother kept pushing him into the situation. Once the lie was out there, he held onto it—not because he enjoyed it, but because he knew the truth would shatter Abhira, and possibly, their entire relationship. Fear makes people do desperate things, and Armaan was no exception.

What happened to Ruhi, unfortunate as it was, didn’t just come out of nowhere or happen decades later as some delayed karmic punishment—it unfolded in the present, shaped by her own choices. Let’s not pretend Ruhi was some innocent victim in all of this. She wished ill for Abhira’s unborn baby, barely cared for her own child while pregnant, and was more concerned about having a son than embracing motherhood itself. That’s hardly the profile of a blameless, wronged woman. Actions have consequences, and Ruhi wasn’t just a casualty of fate—she played an active role in shaping her own downfall. Again, that doesn’t mean I’m excusing Armaan or Rohit’s actions. Ruhi should never have been separated from her child—especially considering the impact on her baby.

Thirty years is a long time—long enough that trying to pin it on Armaan's karma is like blaming the weather today on what you ate for breakfast a month ago. The truth had to come out, and it did. It wasn’t karma coming for Armaan; it was simply the weight of long-buried lies finally collapsing in on themselves. If anything, Armaan and Rohit unknowingly set the final gears in motion to expose the decades of deception spun by Vidya and Kaveri.

So no, just because you don’t like Armaan doesn’t mean he’s responsible for every bad thing happening in the universe. If the stock market crashes tomorrow, are you going to blame Armaan for that too? Before flinging the word "karma" around like it’s a buzzword, at least understand what it actually means.

And let’s not even start on the hypocrisy in the fandom. People drag characters through the mud, talk endless crap about them, and then conveniently twist their arguments when it comes to defending their favorites. Suddenly, their faves being "weakly written" is an excuse for every questionable action, but when it comes to characters they dislike, it's all about "accountability" and "writing flaws."

Abhira is called out for not doing X or Y, but Ruhi? Oh no, everything she does—good, bad, or terrible—is just because she’s “weakly written.” Funny how that works. Is Abhira not a weakly written character too? And if we’re going there, so are Armaan and Rohit. Every character in this generation has been inconsistently written, but the mental gymnastics some fans do to defend one while crucifying the other is truly next-level.

At this point, it's not even about storytelling—it's about selective outrage. The double standards are ridiculous. If you want to criticize, do it fairly. If you want to defend, at least be consistent. Otherwise, just admit you’re biased and move on.

I don't agree with everything, but you have written it very well. I have criticized Armaan many times based on his actions , but the double standards and selective outrage doesn't make sense. Abhira and Armaan are hated just by gen 3 leads ke some fans. I myself don't support AbhiMaan but the way this forum is so anti - Abhira Sharma is ridiculous

Originally posted by: Sneha.Narayanan

I don't agree with everything, but you have written it very well. I have criticized Armaan many times based on his actions , but the double standards and selective outrage doesn't make sense. Abhira and Armaan are hated just by gen 3 leads ke some fans. I myself don't support AbhiMaan but the way this forum is so anti - Abhira Sharma is ridiculous