Originally posted by: ShadowImbue
@bold what if Vidya mata was victim instead of culprit & Abhir was culprit instead of victim, Would Armaan go for "out of court settlement" instead of punishing Abhir? Even if Vidya mata was handicapped because of Abhir and herself wanted justice by sending Abhir to jail?
Armaan who took revenge for his culprit maa to be sent to jail, as Abhira didn't go for out of court settlement instead punished his maa, vowing for Abhira's public humiliation the way his mother faced, by cancelling her license. Would Armaan himself agreed for out of court settlement, overlooking justice, if Vidya mata was handicapped because of Abhir? Armaan wasn't wrong in siding with Vidya, but he was in expecting Abhira to go for out of court settlement, even after seeing the damage Vidya caused. Out of court settlement for Armaan was financial compensation, would financial compensation, actually compensate for the loss and pain of lifetime? A man is handicapped and victim and his family not going for out of court settlement are considered wrong?
If we reverse the situation would Abhira be supported for divorcing Armaan because he supported his victim maa and sent her culprit brother (who faced pain, abandonment, physical and mental torture in his life) to jail, instead of going for out of court settlement? Abhir would also face public humiliation and outrage being an artist. In my opinion, Vidya being the victim and Abhir the culprit would have been a better case scenario. Supporting culprit mother because of the debt, upbringing and immense love is understandable but expecting the victim's family to support culprit mother is unfair, specifically when you urself can't do the same for your spouse, if your mother was victim.
1.5k