Chu BB. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with DV not wanting Vivian to hold him. As he stated, he had told Vivian in his first week that he doesn't like being held like that.
More importantly, Vivian was part of the bully gang, part of the 5 who were attacking him before it escalated further - so haq banta hai for DV to move VD off him. Others were taking Rajat away right so I doubt it was necessary anyway AND as DV said, he was in control.
I don’t know why Vivian is getting a free pass in that argument that led to the fight. Even Kashish is wrong when she said 4 people were attacking him when it was 5. DV wasn’t even talking to Vivian, he called Eisha a follower of Sara & Vivian decided to join the bullying and insult him. Then DV gave it back.. and owned him because he was chatting bakwas.
i agree. i don't think diggy is wrong for not wanting to be touched when things are so heated. it's his personal space and body and if he doesn't want to be touched by certain people, then what's the issue? he has expressed this before with other people as well that i don't want to be touched when i'm mad. it's not that he specifically had a problem with vivian doing it - he has previously expressed it to someone else too (i think it was chahat). shilpa also tried to grab him in the fight and he snatched his arm away. vivian and he were on opposite sides anyway during the fight so why would he want vivian to grab him and take him away in that moment? their argument had already started prior to rajat getting physical with diggy because vivian decided to jump into a fight that was between eisha and diggy, so why would he want vivian's help in that moment? per is baat k jawab mein log kehte hain k vivian should have let diggy get beaten up then. han bhae pittne deta agar diggy ko nahi pasand usko koi pakray to rehne do and let him face whatever consequences he wants to face
0