Shrimad Ramayan daily episode discussion thread (29/7/24) - Page 6

Ok right my views

Yes distortion was there. Creative liberty too

Sequence was gadbad

Lakshman ko i won't say sidelined coz if u see the episode u will understand..

See yahan short mein bata rahe hai

Bahut baat miss ho jaati hai so better watch the episode.

Meghu used some astra on lakshman which hit him like shaktibaan

So he fell on knees

Meghu here is protected by bargad tree but i think it shd be his ghodagaadi

So guess to gv lakshman an edge bargad hi hata diya Hanuman ne

But battle scenes were good actually

Only I'm worried ki final battle where lakshman cuts meghu head it will be done fast and I think I heard Indra astra but not sure

So watch and see what u feel

Originally posted by: IbuHatela

THANK YOU! Some of the people here just complain nonstop. Authenticity this, what actually happened that. It's annoying I get it, but come on. They don't have to keep everything by the book and they might not have the time either. A little extra sizzle or less sizzle/shifting of story won't hurt anyone, especially when it means less of Meghu dominating.

Ahem, *clears throat*

1) They never kept ANYTHING by the book. Not for Lakshman atleast and if you or anyone here thinks otherwise, please be my guest.

2) Little extra sizzle, buddy we do not need anymore sizzles. Ravan's sarees give us enough.

3) Ramayan has close to 300+ versions. 3 are major, Valmiki, Manas and Adhyatma. They didn't bother sticking even remotely to ANY of it. Don't have time ? Don't make a show on history without basic research.

I'm going to give you the benefit of doubt and consider you've not read any text. The expectation isn't to match upto it but to atleast remain respectful and not butcher a character to the point its unrecognisable and in a wrong way.

This isn't a melodrama, its not a regular saas bahu show. It's history, people are bound to have sentiments attached. Not everything has to be grossly dramatic to appeal to the public. ESPECIALLY not when it's history.

I usually refrain from voicing out so explicitly but I guess it's about time the "complainers" are cut some slack because that's not all what they do. If people can take appreciation and not criticism then boy they have a MAJOR problem to fix.

Originally posted by: ananya3129

This is hiw that battle happened according to VR

At this point it'll suffice if they just show the two main contenders fighting together lol.

What was shown today ( inserting Hanuman ji ) is not creative liberty, its called distortion. When you show something imaginary out of no where its not at all creative liberty. If you are making a show on history you should do proper research before showing something really absurd. Some people may watch just for entertainment purpose but there are a lot of people who take this seriously, they may think war happened like this.

Enough of my rants

.

Originally posted by: RamLakshman

At this point it'll suffice if they just show the two main contenders fighting together lol.

Dekh lena Hanuman ji will help Ramji to kill Ravan

They will give Agasthya Rishi part to Hanuman ji too

Originally posted by: RamLakshman

Ahem, *clears throat*

1) They never kept ANYTHING by the book. Not for Lakshman atleast and if you or anyone here thinks otherwise, please be my guest.

2) Little extra sizzle, buddy we do not need anymore sizzles. Ravan's sarees give us enough.

3) Ramayan has close to 300+ versions. 3 are major, Valmiki, Manas and Adhyatma. They didn't bother sticking even remotely to ANY of it. Don't have time ? Don't make a show on history without basic research.

I'm going to give you the benefit of doubt and consider you've not read any text. The expectation isn't to match upto it but to atleast remain respectful and not butcher a character to the point its unrecognisable and in a wrong way.

This isn't a melodrama, its not a regular saas bahu show. It's history, people are bound to have sentiments attached. Not everything has to be grossly dramatic to appeal to the public. ESPECIALLY not when it's history.

I usually refrain from voicing out so explicitly but I guess it's about time the "complainers" are cut some slack because that's not all what they do. If people can take appreciation and not criticism then boy they have a MAJOR problem to fix.

You are doing " Bhains ke aage bin bajana"

Originally posted by: ananya3129

You are doing " Bhains ke aage bin bajana"

Bin tha, mauka tha, bajaa dia jisko sunai de wahi sahi

Arre episode se jyada to precap me Darr laga muje....yeh Lakshman ji ne Aindrastra chalane se pehle Jo final lines boli thi,,,about ShriRam's Dharm,Prowess,Maryada,he sort of invoked Aindrastra and added his devotion and trust towards ShriRam to weapon and then unleashed it....woh to wahi bolenge na??yaa woh vibhishan ko gyi!!!!🙄🤨😐😵‍💫🤕🤒😰