Originally posted by: Indira1211
if we look at it just for kaki and her husband..it was a good decision as now theyāll get money ..they were poor ..so the money will help them..from abhiras perspective..she did fairly well..if she continued she would have won the case ..and her taking monetary compensation for her clients is beneficial to them..as for Ruhi..she didnāt learn her lesson,.and sheās still capable of going out there and killing someoneās else with her reckless driving.. I donāt know about laws in Indiaā¦but where I live if you are speeding and someone is injured..the case goes to court and even if nobody is injured but your speed is double the speed limit and itās caught by camera or a traffic officer stops you..you donāt get a fine..you have to appear in. Court..and if youāre drinking and drinking..itās also straight to jail and people stay overnight in jail for driving under the influence of alcohol..we have very strict laws regarding driving offences..
what you are saying is valid here too ..but if Ruhi had been under the influence or speeding, they should have worked on proving that ..even the CCTV footage showed nothing really ..these days, cars have black boxes which contain all information related to the driving including speeding etc..if the writers really cared, they should have made it a proper case ..they never did ..they made all of them appear foolish in my opinion ..!
565