Teri Meri Doriyaann Episode Discussion Thread - 60 [DT Note: pg-50] - Page 107

Originally posted by: Athz

I think Sahiba and Angad should co-parent. THem coming to this decision should be the happy ending of TMD. Isse zyaada positivity TMD mein allowed nahi hein.

Also how old was the fetus/ unborn baby? I am curious . I thought it was 1 month old. But I see some saying a week old, 5 days, 1 week, almost a month...I think its the Seerat track that left me confused.

No matter how many months old , even if it was 6 months old, crying over a foetus is ridiculously pathetic no matter how much everyone tries to convince me that the acting makes it look good. How can you not even care for the woman you lived with and claimed to love but cry over a foetus in her womb?

I don't know exactly but I am assuming less than one month old because Diljeets family thinks kid is his right? So he must have been delivered close to 9 months after he told his family they were married.

Why co parent? Sahiba should tell in court how they treated her and kicked her out of her legal home, get full custody and demand child support. She can continue co parenting with Diljeet.

However makers are consistently selling that Angad Sahiba will come together because of the kid, basically if kid is alive Angads love for Sahiba is true (million conditions apply)

Angad has made many false promises, he can't be trusted as a parent. Keerat clearly said he is taking out Sahiba's anger on her, next time he is mad at Sahiba he will ill treat the child because child is the biggest reminder of Sahiba. He should just be forced to pay child support and never get even temporary custody of the kid.

There is a huge difference between lying and hiding the truth.ofcourse sahiba is too dense to keep on repeating same mistakes. And now that she involved another partner in her life ,it's like bling leading blind .

All they could think now is to reach the well .in there thought process it's to give akeer a beautiful and harmonious life . They never thought of the things that could go wrong . She fully intents to come honest to akeer about his paternity but now is not the time neither she has the courage to confuse her child .he 5 for God sake at this age a child couldn't even pick a chocolate out of his two favourites . And people expect her to have reveal such information. Okay had she done that when do u think wasthe right time ? 2 years when he starting to talk properly? 3 when learned to form a proper sentence? 4 when he was busy with toys and curious at how world is.i think that would have been too troubling for a young mind.

I don't think sahiba asked the boy to call him father or along the lines. But it was the child who picked him as father when he took care of him, loved the little one without inhibition,lived with him 24*7.

Originally posted by: hellodona

Need the meeting to be fast. Tired of Angad playing victim about a dead foetus, like you don't care if the mother is alive but a foetus in a high risk pregnancy is what matters.

All these justifications for why a man couldn't care less about a woman's life, not even like a basic human but is obsessed with a fetus in her belly. I would find it pathetic except Angad has done all sorts of abuse on Sahiba so this can't be worse than all he has done.

Does he not know he can marry a woman and produce a kid? I hope the meeting sets him straight and we are free of true lover Angads whining.

Sahiba will not stand up for herself and the hurt he caused by kicking her out.

But she will definitely tell him he did no duties of a father, he neither birthed the kid nor did he take care. She will stand up for Diljeets right as a father.

(What everyone is forgetting, she is the mother, Akir isn't going away from her and she needs to believe Angad will be a good and more deserving dad over Diljeet. Why will she? And even if she starts believing Angad is the better dad, Angad has raised a bully who will hurt her child in jealousy later and Angad likely won't say a word)

I am still trying to understand what the hell is he supposed to move on from?

A foetus that wasn't even a month old? A murderer parayi aurat? Inn main se kaunsi cheez se woh move on nahi kar paa raha?

His heart is only full of hatred and he is unable to move on because punching bag nahi banne ko taiyyar koi.

Parayi aurat ki behen keerat se hate h ussey related kuch nahi pasand to bacha bhi to wahi paida kar rahi thi us bachey k liye kyun marey jaa raha h hate him also kyunki paida bhi sahiba ne kiya h jab sahiba se related har cheez se nafrat h to bachey se bhi kar

But nahi na to ye admi khush reh sakta h or na hi dusron ko khush dekh sakta h...sirf abuse karna aata h dusron ko

Garry or uski family or beti ko hatred mil rahi h abuse mil raha h kyun kyunki Garry iska baap ya beta thodi na h isko kya matlab behen h usko Jo karna h karey kyunki vo angad ki behen h or Garry sirf cousin h right angad ki nazar mein usko chodkar koi dusra insaan hi nahi h sirf angad ko dard hota h baaki dusron ko thodi kuch hota h Issey angad ko kya lena

Or agar Aaj sahiba ya uska bacha ussey dur h bhi to uski khud k gussey ki wajah se iske liye sahiba zimedaar nahi h

Sahiba ne phone karke pura sach bataya tha bachey ka bhi or apna bhi but angad ne last mein bol diya face mat dikhana to nahi dikhaya

Ab agar angad ne nahi suni to usmein sahiba ki kya galti vo to apni taraf se sab bata diya

Angad uske liye bhi sahiba ko blame karega kyun sahiba ne to sab sach bataya tha

Originally posted by: hellodona

No matter how many months old , even if it was 6 months old, crying over a foetus is ridiculously pathetic no matter how much everyone tries to convince me that the acting makes it look good. How can you not even care for the woman you lived with and claimed to love but cry over a foetus in her womb?

I don't know exactly but I am assuming less than one month old because Diljeets family thinks kid is his right? So he must have been delivered close to 9 months after he told his family they were married.

Why co parent? Sahiba should tell in court how they treated her and kicked her out of her legal home, get full custody and demand child support. She can continue co parenting with Diljeet.

However makers are consistently selling that Angad Sahiba will come together because of the kid, basically if kid is alive Angads love for Sahiba is true (million conditions apply)

Absolutely agree. How can he ever claim to have loved her when he didn't even want to know if she was dead or alive? So many questions regarding Angad. As for still grieving over the fetus/unborn baby even after 5 years...I don't know how it is supposed to be. I'm not a parent. So will not comment. Though I find it weird he is not grieving his fathers loss.

Now coming to the child, I think Angad should be given a chance to father his son. Sahiba should not go back to Angad at all. She should maybe marry Diljeet if she is in love or maybe stay as a single mother with her child, BUt denying Angad his rights as a father wouldn't be the solution there. ITs inhumane. That child is his biologically and he wasn't given a chance to look after it. If he had refused to look after it then yes, he shouldn't be given a chance to even look at the child.

But going by the story, Angad-Sahiba can never be happy together. So it is best to separate them. Wanting them together is like crying over spilled milk. There are so many horrible husbands who are good fathers. When your spouse is horrible to you, you leave the spouse and find a better one, not deny your child his/her father, no? And of course, the child will and should stay most of the time with his mother than anyone else is my opinion. But at the same time, he should know who his father is, especially in such a situation. It wouldn't be fair to the child otherwise.

Plus, Angad didn't ill treat Keerat no? He maintains his distance and is hostile to her because she is Sahiba's sister. Why would he ill treat Keerat.

P.S: Not trying to support Angad's actions. What's wrong is wrong. He has wronged Sahiba ...a zillion times. But not his child. at least not yet. He doesn't deserve Sahiba, but he probably deserves the child.

Originally posted by: Anu_02

agar bacha hi chahiye to dusri shadi karke karle paida kon rok raha h usko but no usko khud nahi rehna simran ko bigaad diya criminal bana dega pura jo ek choti bachi ko bully karti h abuse karti h or ye ulta keerat ko sunata h simran ko to khoon bhi allow h angad to vo bhi bacha lega

Parayi aurat ki behen keerat se hate h ussey related kuch nahi pasand to bacha bhi to wahi paida kar rahi thi us bachey k liye kyun marey jaa raha h hate him also kyunki paida bhi sahiba ne kiya h jab sahiba se related har cheez se nafrat h to bachey se bhi kar

But nahi na to ye admi khush reh sakta h or na hi dusron ko khush dekh sakta h...sirf abuse karna aata h dusron ko

Garry or uski family or beti ko hatred mil rahi h abuse mil raha h kyun kyunki Garry iska baap ya beta thodi na h isko kya matlab behen h usko Jo karna h karey kyunki vo angad ki behen h or Garry sirf cousin h right angad ki nazar mein usko chodkar koi dusra insaan hi nahi h sirf angad ko dard hota h baaki dusron ko thodi kuch hota h Issey angad ko kya lena

Or agar Aaj sahiba ya uska bacha ussey dur h bhi to uski khud k gussey ki wajah se iske liye sahiba zimedaar nahi h

Sahiba ne phone karke pura sach bataya tha bachey ka bhi or apna bhi but angad ne last mein bol diya face mat dikhana to nahi dikhaya

Ab agar angad ne nahi suni to usmein sahiba ki kya galti vo to apni taraf se sab bata diya

Angad uske liye bhi sahiba ko blame karega kyun sahiba ne to sab sach bataya tha

@bold: had the child survived(which he thinks didn't) and in his sight , the child would have been abused . Angad would project all his anger on that innocent child just because he reminded him of his mother .because angad Singh Brar never learnt the art of forgiving neither being thankful. When he could fight the woman who saved his and his whole family from being homeless just because it was not done according to him. What gives you the assurance that he wouldn't hate child who is the closest to the woman who apparently killed his father ?

Originally posted by: Athz

Now coming to the child, I think Angad should be given a chance to father his son. Sahiba should not go back to Angad at all. She should maybe marry Diljeet if she is in love or maybe stay as a single mother with her child, BUt denying Angad his rights as a father wouldn't be the solution there. ITs inhumane. That child is his biologically and he wasn't given a chance to look after it. If he had refused to look after it then yes, he shouldn't be given a chance to even look at the child.

No. If you kick out wife when she is pregnant you don't deserve child she carried and delivered. How you treat the woman carrying child is not independent of how you will treat the child. Neither legally nor morally. What deserve? If you are unmarried at time of delivery you have full custody of child , Sahiba can do as she wishes, the child can get mad at her but till he is a minor it is all in Sahiba's hands. In fact she could have directly walked into police station that day.

Angad is inhumane. He doesn't deserve a damn thing other than jail , where Sahiba rescued him from sadly. Least of all the chance to ruin another kids life. But if he is that desperate he should try fathering with a woman he doesn't hate and abuse relentlessly.

There is genuinely no moral argument, partners like Angad don't deserve custody. Angad hasn't simply wronged Sahiba, what he and his family do is serious abuse, it isn't about lack of love, it is lack of humanity.

But like I said, those who believe Angad deserves to raise a child, please hope he fathers with a woman he doesn't hate..because yes, how a man treats the mother impacts the child. Angad constantly ill treating , throwing things and raising voice at Sahiba will adversely impact Akir too, even if she is someone else's wife, he doesn't talk to Sahiba with bare minimum decency even.

So my question does Sahiba deserve this child??? Because she gave birth to him?? It seems she doesn't have a right on Akir. No motherly effection or bonding; all Akir does is when he is upset and calls for Diljit. When he refuses to eat, only Diljit can make him eat. Diljit sings to soothe him. He goes to a teacher meeting. Sahiba didn't know akir was doing good at school. She has mentioned that to the principal 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️...

What is She doing so far?? All these six years, those who gave shelter she lying on her teeth to them..does she come clean with bhaji, or it will go under the carpet.. 🤷‍♀️

Originally posted by: hellodona

No. If you kick out wife when she is pregnant you don't deserve child she carried and delivered. How you treat the woman carrying child is not independent of how you will treat the child. Neither legally nor morally. What deserve? If you are unmarried at time of delivery you have full custody of child , Sahiba can do as she wishes, the child can get mad at her but till he is a minor it is all in Sahiba's hands. In fact she could have directly walked into police station that day.

Angad is inhumane. He doesn't deserve a damn thing other than jail , where Sahiba rescued him from sadly. Least of all the chance to ruin another kids life. But if he is that desperate he should try fathering with a woman he doesn't hate and abuse relentlessly.

Wasn't sahiba a single woman when she delivered the child. By then their grace period of 180 days was completed and they were not together.which would inevitably sealed the divorce. And also he was the one to push her out of home while she was still pregnant.

And also what kind of hospitals and doctors they go to who believe in medieval science and not for mordern science .sonogram Sonogram and other tests would have revealed the foetus is alive and kicking .

Originally posted by: Athz

In my eyes, Sahan is dead DramaQueenji. They have spared no loophole to get them back together. Seems like Dilba is the endgame and it does make sense as per the unique storyline of the makers....and the slap, the abuse and they finally topped it with this horrible track, that put a full stop to everything. Sahan was such a beautiful couple, and in they did seem to be really in love whenever the writers gave them a chance. But kya karein...they had to butcher both the characters to make way for the new ML. And Sahiba got sidelined. There no mother and son scenes where they bond, the son is not affected by the mother and we don't really know Sahiba's POV. Okay, probably thy want to show she doesn't want to go back to her past. Lekin, they can show her POV when it comes to her child no? Instead of gusaoing Diljeet into every scene where she is thinking about her son and her past!

Also one more question What as Yash's role in Seerat track? To summon Seerat to the phone booth and say, good job partner? Big time BS!!!

Yes..I too am wondering how these ppl will bring Sahan together...They have destroyed Angad completely by not even showing that he tried to look for her when she disappeared..The guy doesn't even know or care if she is love or dead? How can they convince us he loved/loves/will love her...

I was thinking they will bring them together for the sake of the kid ( though I never wanted them to unite for that)..But kid seems to care 0% for the mother..She is like a wall paper in his life...there are no bonding scenes between the kid and Sahiba...other than giving birth to him, Sahiba doesn't seem to have any role in his life..In this scenario, how will we believe that the kid asked for his mother..ideally he should be asking for his foster father after going to Brar mansion ..So how will they unite them for the kid now?

They have not only destroyed Angad completely in this track, but they have also destroyed the essence of Sahiba...Ache aadmi ko acha dikhane ke liye Sahiba ko completely incompetent wall poster bana diya hai...It seems like more than Akeer, Sahiba ( The once strong independent girl) cannot function without Akeer ke papa...She needs him for everything..esp anything related to her son..Her role is only to smile the 'contended smile' after witnessing the relationship of 'Akeer ke papa' and HIS son...Diljeet seems to be implying at times that he is the responsible father and the bad qualities in the kid are coming from Angad...Arre Sahiba has let her kid be raised by this man in whatever way he wants and does him do whatever he wants in the name of love and responsibility...Its like she is the foster mother and he is the real father

And from what we are being shown from past 2 days noone can imply that Angad didn't do his responsibilities as a parent? Hell, Angad is shown as caring so much even for his unborn lost baby then how can we audience accept the blame that he doesn't deserve to be with the kid since he didn't do any responsibilities...It will only come across as that He was not given the opportunity by fate to do those responsibilities ( because he missed hearing what Sahiba said) and due to the same fate(karma) he missed birthing and precious years of his son....Angad is a pathetic husband but noone can question his love and yearning for his child...Provided he had the opportunity he would have shouldered all responsibilities regarding the kid very well...Sahiba should decide to not go with him since he is a pathetic husband but she doesn't have any right keep him away from his kid's life in future ( once she knows that he didn't know about the kid).

I really don't know what the makers are doing with the characters, or what they want to show or where are they taking this story...

But whatever we have seen so far, both of them seem devoid of love ( if it ever existed) and I say there is no point in uniting them.. Sahiba should not go back to Angad. She should marry (if she has not yet) Akeer ke papa (Since she can't function without him) and live with him happily ever . Angad lost the right to be in her life forever due to what he did ( based on story so far). But he has every right to be in his Kid's life. He should be able to/allowed to coparent the kid with her. He should also let go of the resentment within him and move on with someone whom he can love and cherish ( which he never did to Sahiba).

Originally posted by: arnavkushi14

So my question does Sahiba deserve this child??? Because she gave birth to him?? It seems she doesn't have a right on Akir. No motherly effection or bonding; all Akir does is when he is upset and calls for Diljit. When he refuses to eat, only Diljit can make him eat. Diljit sings to soothe him. He goes to a teacher meeting. Sahiba didn't know akir was doing good at school. She has mentioned that to the principal 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️...

What is She doing so far?? All these six years, those who gave shelter she lying on her teeth to them..does she come clean with bhaji, or it will go under the carpet.. 🤷‍♀️

Is she a druggie?

Does she abuses her child ?

Is she not fit to care for her child ?

Can she not provide for her child ?

Is she on hunt by officials ?

No? Then my friend she eligible and also deserving to have her child!

A child is mega trantrum thrower. They know who to butter to get exactly what they want. It's not like parents doesn't know what happening behind those twinkling eyes and curious minds. Parents just ignore. Parents - mother and father .both cannot be strict neither lenient.there should be a balance . That is what these 2 does .sahiba become sthe bad cop, while diljeet took up being the good cop .that doens't mean a mother in not involved in her childs life