Originally posted by: anushka87
Agree with Sahiba and Manveer point. TBH I never found Gary a good choice or appreciable for punishing Seerat (just like I'm not finding Sirat good and appreciable for physically torturing Angad to this extent, because he never did anything to her hadn't done anything wrong) Garry Seerat ko khari khoti sunata tha vo fir bhi chalo theek tha, but it was never okay to physically torture Seerat. What did Seerat do with him?? Nothing Actually. If Seerat was married to him and she still had lust for Angad then Garry was also married to her and still used to sleep with other girls. So yaha Garry was never a good option but jab ab agar sach me sudhar gaya hai to leacture de sakta hai. Yaha Garry Seerat se ye physical torture deserve karta tha actually but phir bhi Angad jitna nahi shayad Sorry, jaisa Garry ne uske sath kiya tha waisa hi shayad. Hmmm dekhte hain Seerat ko punishment milti hai ya nahi, lag to raha hai mil jayegi but as you said seerat is TMD maker's favourite so.
Garry is the aggressor in case of Seerat. He is never the right person to punish her because he was never wronged by Seerat.
Seerat should have redirected her energy on Garry. At least og kept hierarchy correct, Rahul wronged Dyuti, both wronged Riddhi Khori. Here we are counting on Garry to punish Seerat when he actually played a bigger part than anyone else in Seerats super villain arc.
In Beyadh, even Maya was scared of her dad who abused her but she made everyone else's life hell. Seerat is getting same arc but with extremely shoddy writing and by forcing Garry as a hero, because of course this ph has writers who don't use brain cells or morals.
My Sahiba argument is simply because the last time Sahiba slapped someone, it was Mannat (I think) for Angad's sake, then Angad returned the favor by slapping Sahiba and she is the last person he slapped.
Edited by hellodona - 1 years ago