MT: It's a shame - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

85

Views

5.3k

Users

24

Likes

467

Frequent Posters

Wistfulness thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Banner Contest Winner Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 1 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: mintyblue


There are far bigger concerns like economy, global warming, and lack of jobs.


Minty, the Ram Mandir is not being constructed by the government. So, how does the construction even impact the bigger concerns in any way?

Furthermore, if you refer to the ASI findings and actual court judgment in place of leftist rags like wire liar, you'd know a temple existed and that invader Babur demolished it.

1275042 thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: Wistfulness

Minty, the Ram Mandir is not being constructed by the government. So, how does the construction even impact the bigger concerns in any way?

Furthermore, if you refer to the ASI findings and actual court judgment in place of leftist rags like wire liar, you'd know a temple existed and that invader Babur demolished it.

Giving justificatuons and seeking validations from non hindus who are kattar anti hindus would be silly. Their clear cut stand in the matter should clear all your doubts where they actually come from. A lot of such kattar anti hindus hide under the veil of spiritjality/athiesm to spew hatred for hindus/hinduism.

Those who are denying temple ever existed despite ASI proofs n still calling it a babri mosque are a lost cause. They must have given up on their roots long back for them to root for that ugly structure built by the invaders after destroying the anccient temple.

You can also tell which side their ancestors must have fought from.

Raijeera thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago
#33

Did India had any mosque before Mughal invaded India? Lots of divine temples were destroyed to make mosque upon them. Why is it wrong for Hindus to celebrate the temple pran pratishtha for their own Lord's which was the Janmbhoomi of Rama?

Even today hindu temples are being continuously attacked and destroyed and woke secularist doesn't bat an eye.

catchm-ifucan thumbnail
Rocker Thumbnail 4th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago
#34

It’s indeed shameful that you don’t know the meaning of ‘secularism’.

Wistfulness thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Banner Contest Winner Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 1 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: Funtuss

Giving justificatuons and seeking validations from non hindus who are kattar anti hindus would be silly. Their clear cut stand in the matter should clear all your doubts where they actually come from. A lot of such kattar anti hindus hide under the veil of spiritjality/athiesm to spew hatred for hindus/hinduism.

Those who are denying temple ever existed despite ASI proofs n still calling it a babri mosque are a lost cause. They must have given up on their roots long back for them to root for that ugly structure built by the invaders after destroying the anccient temple.

You can also tell which side their ancestors must have fought from.

I personally find mentions of economy and other matters hilarious because the temple and economy aren't even mutually exclusive. So, just wanted to see if the user bothers to explain.


Regarding the ones trying to gaslight us since yesterday, I agree it's best to ignore them. The only good thing is that it made a few more people wake up to the harsh reality of one-sided secularism.

catchm-ifucan thumbnail
Rocker Thumbnail 4th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago
#36

The temple is getting built on its own. The amount of donations that are pouring in, it’s not just the temple but the entire Ayodhya and it’s neighborhood is going to get uplifted thereby creating enormous business opportunities to the locals, which includes people from all religions. It’s a win win for everyone. The whiners should stop for a second and read the room, may be you won’t feel that miserable anymore.

PunnyPotato thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: Wistfulness

I personally find mentions of economy and other matters hilarious because the temple and economy aren't even mutually exclusive. So, just wanted to see if the user bothers to explain.


Regarding the ones trying to gaslight us since yesterday, I agree it's best to ignore them. The only good thing is that it made a few more people wake up to the harsh reality of one-sided secularism.

The funniest thing Mandir should be the last place to talk about the economy.

They are made from donations and most importantly pay TAXES which are used in the economy and also to give freebies to people who will in return spread toxicity for Mandir.

PunnyPotato thumbnail
Posted: 1 years ago
#38

Originally posted by: loginidran

The temple is getting built on its own. The amount of donations that are pouring in, it’s not just the temple but the entire Ayodhya and it’s neighborhood is going to get uplifted thereby creating enormous business opportunities to the locals, which includes people from all religions. It’s a win win for everyone. The whiners should stop for a second and read the room, may be you won’t feel that miserable anymore.

You know the best thing

Mandir abhi tak just made from the interest they got after making the FD of all the donations in the Bank.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".