Archies Review/Spoilers Discussion - Page 16

Originally posted by: 1t1svat1t1s

And this guy Agastya didn’t want to play Lakshmana in Ramayana because he didn’t want to play ‘second’ lead roles? Acting is so bad that he wouldn’t even get a role of one of the vanarsena if he was made to audition for it. 🤣

the one with ranbir kapoor?

Originally posted by: 1t1svat1t1s

And this guy Agastya didn’t want to play Lakshmana in Ramayana because he didn’t want to play ‘second’ lead roles? Acting is so bad that he wouldn’t even get a role of one of the vanarsena if he was made to audition for it. 🤣

Appearance wise he is a miscast for Archie.

Lakshmana would've been good for him..letting it go is a wrong decision

Agastya is just Abhishek 2.0. And nobody wanted an original Abhishek in the first place. Completely colorless actor.

Suhana has no screen presence. I don't want to sound mean, but you need certain looks to be camera ready and she lacks those completely. If you lack looks, you better deliver as an actress and she doesn't come close.

Out of the three nepos, Khushi comes across the best but that's more an indictment on the other two than praise for her. I think she has the most potential.

Vedang was easily the best and reminds me a lot of Ranveer.

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

https://x.com/NarendramodiPa/status/1732781602714046542?s=20

Ohh my eyes !

Zoya should've hired Kareena to tutor Suhana if she was so inclined to cast her in THIS role. Kareena has Veronica written all over her personality.

TBH if Suhana and Agastya didn't belong to the families they do..they would've been playing different roles in this musical

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Also glad to see lots of reviews appreciating Vedang! I definitely want to see more of him....if you know what I mean

He actually acted well, good dancer, looks hot and has screen presence unlike the rest.

Originally posted by: Kyahikahoon

TBH if Suhana and Agastya didn't belong to the families they do..they would've been playing different roles in this musical

They would not even have the looks or talent to be hired as the side hero/heroine let alone the leads.

Originally posted by: 1t1svat1t1s

Omg. 100% agree with you. Absolute show stealer. He has the screen presence of a star.

All he have to do stand there with his cheeky smile & mischievous eyes still he will make his presence felt.

Originally posted by: 1t1svat1t1s

I tried to search but too lazy to scroll through the reviews. Who is this Vedang Raina? He looked so much like Ranveer in Lootera. Is he related to him in anyway?

Hope this article helps

https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/who-is-vedang-raina-all-you-need-to-know-about-the-archies-star/photostory/105395802.cms

Originally posted by: 1t1svat1t1s

And this guy Agastya didn’t want to play Lakshmana in Ramayana because he didn’t want to play ‘second’ lead roles? Acting is so bad that he wouldn’t even get a role of one of the vanarsena if he was made to audition for it. 🤣

Ouch! That was brutal

Now that reminds me SRK played Vanar during his teen days.

These kids are so arrogant now a days. Acting pricey Bina matlab ke!

My review:

I finally watched it since some annoying people were trying to spin false narratives,

Firstly I want to first appreciate Vedang, Mihir, Dot and Yuvraj. It takes a lot of courage to work with nepo kids and stand shoulder to shoulder with them. I must say these four held their own.

The show stealer is certainly Vedang. You can’t help but stare at him. Even when he’s doing nothing, the screen presence draws you in. He has the charm, body and acting talent for sure. I really hope he gets more opportunities because he absolutely rocked it. He’s so hot

Agastya was a let down for me. He doesn’t have the charm nor physicality to pull the role off. In some scenes he was purposely made to be taller than Vedang which was hilarious. I found Agastya particularly weak in group scenes. He’s a bit better when he’s alone or in a scene with one actor, but in a group setting the insecurity shows on his face. His mannerisms are full on Abhishek and that’s not a compliment. One strain of that guy is more than enough for our lifetime. Also his mouth is really weird looking.

Khushi was good but needs to improve more. I do think she was a bit better than Janhvi in Dhadak, who was just plain awful. There were some scenes where her mouth looked weird. She surprisingly does better in louder scenes or when she has to speak up.

Suhana Khan makes Ananya Pandey look better. I have a newfound love for Ananya suddenly Suhana Khan - you don’t have the face, looks, attitude, body or acting skills to be in Bollywood. This is what she learned in acting school. YUCK. Please go away and don’t pollute the screen again. In some scenes she looked like how SRK looked in Pathan with his long hair I can’t unsee it now. Also her voice sounds terrible, it almost sounds like a screeching cat that is being muffled. Shes supposed to play a hot thing in this role? Hahaha! I wouldn’t even notice her if she was in my school. What horrible casting. Girl bye. Tell me how it was. What’s with her walking with her bum sticking out like Malaika so vulgar she is yaar.

All of the songs were annoying. The movie otherwise was MEH. Cant believe Zoya directed this. She has wasted her own time and energy in this crap. Even the Student of the Year movies are better than this horrible movie.

I feel like I want to go watch Gangubai and worship the floor Alia walks in. My god. These kids are next level bad.