I don’t think it’s an unpopular opinion based on my own experience in the UK. Ranbir is typically first choice amongst his Bollywood peers but outside that circle Ranveer tends to have an edge as the preferred actor from my experience (I know many people who aren’t really huge Bollywood junkies but they will go watch a Ranveer movie no matter the genre).
Originally posted by: diasingh2
Unpopular opinion, but Ranveer Singh is more versatile than (dare I say) and a better package overall (as an actor) than Ranbir and Vicky.
The range he has shown by playing contrasting characters like the ones he played in Band Baja Baraat, Lootera Dil Dhadakane Do, Bajirao, GullyBoy and 83 is commendable
.
He was also terrific in his role as Khilji, since he truly looked very menacing on screen as a villain.
He can also pull off being a mass hero role in films Simba and Rocky Rani Ki Prem Kahani. Films like Circus, Gunday and Kill Dil did not work because of their insanely bad scripts.
Sadly due to his off/screen antics, his onscreen acting capabilities are often downplayed and ignored.
I find Ranbir and Vicky overrated for their acting "calibers" and "range". I also find both of them to be very pretentious, particularly Vicky for his "relatable", simple and "down-to-earth" image
. Not saying he is a bad guy, but I just don't get his appeal.
I find Ranveer more real in that sense. He doesn't give a flying f*** about what people say about his antics. Although I agree that he takes it a bit too far sometimes and i hate it when he pretends to be an "outsider" in the industry which we all know that is not true.
. 
. Not saying he is a bad guy, but I just don't get his appeal.


26