TERE BIN -Yumna Zaidi - Wahaj Ali DT #103 Apne Aukat Me Raho - Page 64

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.2k

Views

43.4k

Users

43

Likes

4.1k

Frequent Posters

Rubab_Naqvi thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7

Romantic Reveries

Posted: 2 years ago
Sera-high123 thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago


Ab woh bhi boring ho gaya hai 🤣🤣

hypnotoad thumbnail
Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: pickachu


Well if we calm down and think properly, the very first scene of the 1st episode started with murtasim going to his enemy's house who was saying that murtasim does not come to him no matter what.But murtasim went there just because of his farmer's daughter's izzat.He truly loves meerab.Even when he saw her in rohail's flat.The type of feudal lords mentality which he has he would have killed rohail and even meerab.But he did not do what usually the feudal lords do and also when he found maryam instead of slapping her or getting angry on her.He hugged his sister but if he had typical feudal lord mentality then honor killing would happen.

I'm saying all these things because it establishes that murtasim respects women.So they cannot change his character just in one episode.


THANK YOU.

Mein bhi kab se yahi bakwas kar rahi hoon ke MR is inconsistent with what we have been shown of MK.

Just re-posting what I said earlier.

The whole USP of MK is that he is NOT your typical feudal lord. He hugged Maryam after rescuing her - a feudal lord to usko zinda zameen main gaad deta.

MR is shown to value consent and izzat of women even when he was an angry young man in E1. His fight with Maliks in E1 was because Zubair was trying to force himself on some ghareeb farmer's daughter.

MR believes in consent in marriage. MK complies with the contract because he respects Merub's choice and values her consent. When MK taped back the contract in E27, he said that until Merub breaks it herself, i.e. signal explicit consent, he will comply with the contract terms. It makes no logical sense for MK to so brutally violate her consent this time. That is not what the character is shown to be.

And don't say he raped her because Merub made him angry - that also makes no sense. To rape someone forcefully requires a certain temparament and innate lack of respect for women. Otherwise this is saying dunya ke har aadmi ke andar ek rapist hai - what nonsense. Aisa ho to har ghar har gali har rishte main violent rape ho raha ho recurrently. MK is not shown to be someone who rapes women. As I said before, from E1, we are told of his izzat for women.

Also, given the history of misleading TB promos, I will not trust the MR theory

Remember the phone phainkna scene in the promos. For a week everyone shat on MK that he threw the phone at Merub but in the actual episode that is not what happened.

Finally, misdirect is a recurrent device used in TB

The patriarchal culture we live in, our knowledge and assumptions about feudal systems, the coding we see in our local content has conditioned us to think that certain cues imply SA / MR. Like if in a film, a girl slaps a boy and the boy says mein usko mazaa chakhata hoon, we are conditioned to think he means SA.

TB plays with this coding a lot to show how MK is not your typical feudal.

Example: When MK finds Maryam, look at his expression as he moves towards Maryam (see pic). Many people may have thought based on his expression that MK will act like a feudal lord - that he will yell at Maryam or slap her. But he hugged her instead.

The same may be happening in E46/E47.

When we hear an angry man from a feudal set up say main batata hoon tumhe contract ki haisyat or apni aukat dikhana, we think SA/MR.

But this is likely a misdirect.

Instead, we may see TB again establishing that MK is not your typical feudal. He may rip the contract and say to Merub that he complies with the terms not because the document has any value but because of his own code of ethics and his respects her choices and consent, and his love for her.

Image

Neha_J thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: pickachu


Kya ye woh wala bts hai jahan haya ko gao bheja tha mrtasim ka saath?🤔


Idk. I'm unable to recall

Priyankaakdha thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: Sera-high123


This is from the episode when Murtu leaves for Village without Me and with Haya.

this reminds me what will happen to haya ... nooran should have answer this in her interview ....

more than anything , i want haya dead 😡😡

Sera-high123 thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: Neha_J


Idk. I'm unable to recall


Wahi hai.

midniteangel thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Expressionist (May 2023) Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: Sera-high123


Chup kar ja......ye sab na bol 🤣🤣

Nahi yaar... at first I thought someone was impersonating wahaj but then I noticed its him... tedha hai par mera hai 🙈☺️

SherDilNetaji thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago

Okay so this Marie is posting Meerasim moments in her story which definitely means it’s not true right? And she also posted the story which Neha shared that don’t judge a book by it’s cover and same goes with episode that don’t judge it by a promo so they are accepting the fact that they deliberately showed the misleading promo

Edited by Moonks - 2 years ago
Neha_J thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: midniteangel

Looks like Marie baji is giving a hint saying that trust KMK 🤔

NO MR!!


Looks like it 🤲🙏

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".