Originally posted by: Moonks
For MB to slap MK for this she needs to consider it as MR, do you really think she would go that way? Those people were so shocked when they got to know about the contract, they don’t take it as R but as the rights of husband, the most probable reason why MB slapped him could be divorce, like Saba said that there has never been any divorce in the family. I have many questions and one of them is when the fight was about Haua why did they bring the contract in between? The only reason would be to breach it and what they indicated was MR, I agree that promo could be misleading but is there a chance that MK seduced her, they consummated and after that he divorces her? Because if it’s the separation and leap then the consummation must have happened.
No sane person will say forcing yourself on your wife such that she runs away is the right thing to do.
When MB says haq she means Merub should willingly give her husband this haq- it dies not mean that MK should force this haq from her (haq dena vs haq cheenna are different things).
The debate in Islamic law is not if marital rape is allowed or not - MR is strictly prohibited.
The debate is whether to treat it under hudood laws (which govern non-marital rape) or under domestic abuse/ domestic violence laws (as MR comes under `harming the wife' category in tradition). However, the latter means lesser punishment than the former which becomes a bone of contention.
742