**Dhruv Tara - Samay Sadi Se Pare Episode Discussion Thread #1 ** - Page 68

Originally posted by: abhe

I'm still pretty sure that even now he doesn't have ittu sa idea that she might not be from this era. Dude is so dense. Not blaming him though. Any sane person wouldn't give it a thought 😆

Pehle pagal khane bheja tha na isi chakkar mein

Originally posted by: DelusionsOfNeha

My queen.. 😆

Also her casually forgetting dto act like a commoner in front of Dhruv.. 😆

Afterall royalty runs through her veins.😆

But HOW did his batti still not burn seeing her act like royalty?😆 Shayad medicine padh padhke iski dimag ki batti chalna band hogayi.😆

Originally posted by: Wanderlust05

Afterall royalty runs through her veins.😆

But HOW did his batti still not burn seeing her act like royalty?😆 Shayad medicine padh padhke iski dimag ki batti chalna band hogayi.😆

Originally posted by: DelusionsOfNeha

yup... He can only see things rationally😆 but a quick Google search should tell about rajkumari Tarapriya of Ballabhgarh 😆

This guy is so dense, he'll think this is some sort of coincidence and the guy who doesn't believe in God, will claim it to be God's miracle. 😆

Haye dhruv

Rajkumari ji paani le ke aayu😆

Originally posted by: DelusionsOfNeha

yup... He can only see things rationally😆 but a quick Google search should tell about rajkumari Tarapriya of Ballabhgarh 😆

OMG! That would literally save ten episodes of dhruv's search and realisation of Tara's truth, which the makers ofcourse can't afford🤣

Originally posted by: abhe

OMG! That would literally save ten episodes of dhruv's search and realisation of Tara's truth, which the makers ofcourse can't afford🤣

It's against ITV rule, I'm afraid.😆

Originally posted by: abhe

OMG! That would literally save ten episodes of dhruv's search and realisation of Tara's truth, which the makers ofcourse can't afford🤣

Yes, but also no.

Depending on how prominent Ballabgarh was as a kingdom, she might have been a minor queen/princess, and therefore not "as important" to feature in the history books. Given the state of Navrang van in the present era, it's quite possible that the kingdom collapsed early and was forgotten.

She might have been relegated to a footnote if she had married the Senapati, and it's quite possible that he would've taken centre-stage instead. Kings in those eras married multiple folks too.

If reasonably prominent, a Google search would probably reveal her name, but not her face. Dhruv would probably think she was bonkers and stole the identity of an erstwhile queen.

I have a weird thought

How is/was past affected since tara came here

Its all in my brain i think

I mean since tara is here, suppose she doesnt go back. Fell in love whatever happen. Wouldnt tyat change history

Originally posted by: Ria23

I have a weird thought

How is/was past affected since tara came here

Its all in my brain i think

I mean since tara is here, suppose she doesnt go back. Fell in love whatever happen. Wouldnt tyat change history

I guess in that case tara would disappear from the history completely with no trace of her existence.