Why so much hate for Rupali Ganguly here? - Page 7

Originally posted by: naaznin

She will never draw the line because if she does Shah's role will be finished and 20min episode won't be filled.

Yupp and no drama

cuz she was rubbing up on 💪🏼 and ion like dat

Originally posted by: ramshuu

I think that is subjective. Rupali acts better than Chaavi in the show. I do agree about Gaurav though. He is probably best thing about the show.

👏

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

The problem is that Rupali is a bad actor.....she gets Anupama more hate because of her bad portrayal of Anupama.....now Anupama is supposed to love CA...right.....but humein lagta hai that she doesn't...🤣....this is just one example.......another is .....that Anupama is supposed to be this great dancer...while Rupali has 2 left feet.....jab dance nahi aata,,,,,toh singer bana dete...atleast someone could have sung for her....😆

Very well said. Agree 100%. Can’t believe TRP is not going down.

Originally posted by: shubhK2308

There are many comments on this forum who showcase their hatred for Rupali, saying that she is a bad actor, bad dancer, why she only keeps getting awards, it's high time to change her etc, but then that's how the industry also works, people aren't able to distinguish you from your reel character.

If they dislike your character, you get hatred in real life also, same way,if people love your onscreen character, they will love the offscreen version of you as well.

&
This means hating RG ?

Yeh kya logic hain ?

Hate would be if people started commenting on her personal life, about her as a person.

She is a actor, obviously people will talk about her acting, dancing, agar nahi karenge toh kis per bolenge?

&

Let's not talk about awards

Everyone knows what Shahi does with Awards

There is the character, there is the acting/actor and then there is the person.

One can criticise, comment on the character, how the outcome/performance was. Sorry, it beats me as to how that translates to hate for the person.

While I can understand, that the actor in the person and hence the person would get affected by the talks around but that is true for any profession isn't it?

Take sports for instance, we take liberties into (or somehow correct) commenting on the form of a player, how good/bad their performances have been, how the game went by without issues or ruffling unwanted feathers.

If my shortcomings as an employee on my output are pointed out.

How do any of these translate to hate for the person?!

In each of these cases, people do get affected but the idea is to think and re-invent.

So, when we point out how flat the character arc of Anupama has been and on many occasions how average and in some places repetitive, over the top the acting has been, NONE (to the best of my knowledge) has expressed anything against the individual.

Just some food for thought, while this is the locus standi for the lead, should this barometer hold good for every individual, whether they portray a positive or negative character?

If we love to hate a badly written negative character, the acting and hence the actor has trumped. Isn't it?

They are ALL characters.

Rupali Ganguly is a nice actor, is a nice person also. Though Anupama is horrible but we have no right to hate her, who knows her in real life. I dont know how she is getting awards, are they planned or not. But she is a nice person.

last year she invited her few fans to her birthday party, which was really a nice gesture.

Everyone here is good if seen with a good perspective. Knowing her since Sarabhai days, if not the best person, she is a good person. Atleast to me.

I dont know why people find her acting to be bad. But she was awesome as Anupama, in initial episodes I loved her. She made me cry, Yeah now it is repetitive, but that doesn't means she can't act. The way she bonded with Paras Kalnawat, but yes the things got spoiled between them, due to the groupism, but she always takes good care of her friends. She is just like Monisha, heard her in the interviews.

Just because of horrible Anupama, I cant hate Rupali.

Originally posted by: musicalstorm

Rupali Ganguly is a nice actor, is a nice person also. Though Anupama is horrible but we have no right to hate her, who knows her in real life. I dont know how she is getting awards, are they planned or not. But she is a nice person.

last year she invited her few fans to her birthday party, which was really a nice gesture.

Everyone here is good if seen with a good perspective. Knowing her since Sarabhai days, if not the best person, she is a good person. Atleast to me.

I dont know why people find her acting to be bad. But she was awesome as Anupama, in initial episodes I loved her. She made me cry, Yeah now it is repetitive, but that doesn't means she can't act. The way she bonded with Paras Kalnawat, but yes the things got spoiled between them, due to the groupism, but she always takes good care of her friends. She is just like Monisha, heard her in the interviews.

Just because of horrible Anupama, I cant hate Rupali.

Absolutely, she was. What happened between them?

Originally posted by: Bodhianveshika

There is the character, there is the acting/actor and then there is the person.

One can criticise, comment on the character, how the outcome/performance was. Sorry, it beats me as to how that translates to hate for the person.

While I can understand, that the actor in the person and hence the person would get affected by the talks around but that is true for any profession isn't it?

Take sports for instance, we take liberties into (or somehow correct) commenting on the form of a player, how good/bad their performances have been, how the game went by without issues or ruffling unwanted feathers.

If my shortcomings as an employee on my output are pointed out.

How do any of these translate to hate for the person?!

In each of these cases, people do get affected but the idea is to think and re-invent.

So, when we point out how flat the character arc of Anupama has been and on many occasions how average and in some places repetitive, over the top the acting has been, NONE (to the best of my knowledge) has expressed anything against the individual.

Just some food for thought, while this is the locus standi for the lead, should this barometer hold good for every individual, whether they portray a positive or negative character?

If we love to hate a badly written negative character, the acting and hence the actor has trumped. Isn't it?

They are ALL characters.

Thank you for stating your point of view in a politeness. Agreed 👍

Here's my two cents:

Rupali is a fairly good actor, in my opinion. She was great in SvS, parvarish and sanjeevani as well. Even in Anupama, her work was appreciated by the audience for a major part, right until the maan marriage track. The problem here is the horrible writing, despicable tracks, butchering of characters, etc. We have already enlisted this multiple times, so I won't expand it into a bhashan .

The same thing becomes boring due to monotony, and thus we criticise. I believe she too feels monotonous, and it is showing in her work, making it look bad. That can be another reason.