Harry and Meghan were right after all? - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

37

Views

8.2k

Users

17

Likes

66

Frequent Posters

Joannna thumbnail
3rd Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: Porcupine

Sometimes I am like if Meghan is in the capacity to control Harry?


Harry was saying that his brother screamed at him in the presence of Queen.

Isn't that a highly common thing even among grown up siblings in home environment? He is complaining as if his brother did a very wrong thing to him.


Siblings don't speak for years due to property disputes or other reasons. Something common in society.


Meghan facing racism in the palace is a common thing again. What should be the color of her kids, anybody can discuss this thing/concern at home if a fair complexioned is married to a dark complexioned even in India homes.


Harry has spoken very clearly about that in the documentary. He says that William and him had a pact that they will never give out stories to the press because they saw what happened between their parents.

Why Harry is so heartbroken is that William’s aide Jason Knauf went on to support the Daily Mail in their battle against Meghan.

Even if someone hates a sibling , we have to admit that William allowing their staff to give support to a newspaper and going against their own brother s wife is a new low altogether. How is that fair ?


Joannna thumbnail
3rd Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

ughhhh....I don't like Royals(any royals)......like what have they done other than being born in a royal family....I mean why is their ass royal....do they poop out roses???

I don't like Meghan and Harry......don't care for them either......

The queen must be like achha hua main nipat gayi....


Haha very true ! At this day and age I don’t understand the point of the Royals and Monarchy!!!


I mean they are above others just coz they are born in a certain family and you become a King / Queen not based on qualifications/hard work but just coz you happen to be the “first born” child 🤯

Maroonporsche thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: Joannna


Haha very true ! At this day and age I don’t understand the point of the Royals and Monarchy!!!


I mean they are above others just coz they are born in a certain family and you become a King / Queen not based on qualifications/hard work but just coz you happen to be the “first born” child 🤯


https://youtube.com/shorts/5GwwAlDDrfo?feature=share

return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 years ago
#34

How did Royal family become Hollywood stars? Megan is not in the family beesh!

return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 years ago
#36

Interestingly, the same desi millennials who worship Princess Diana and abhor the royal family for doing her dirty hate Megan just as much as they loved Diana.

Is it racism?

Partially, yes. One can't deny that desis tend to favor white people while looking down on dark people. But that is a piece of the puzzle.

The bigger piece of the puzzle is something most desis and the royals have in common - culture and tradition, hierarchical family dynamics, and the notion of saving face. Even the most modern and rebellious desi youth often acquiesce to certain traditions. There is this unwritten expectation that family elders will be intentionally cruel and demanding to newcomers until the newcomer somehow proves they are part of the family. Sometimes even if the family doesn't subscribe to a tradition, "log kya kahenge" or "saving face in society" tends to dictate certain behaviors. And people understand that its not personal but a weird ritual.

We see it in K3G. Yash Raichand is a staunch patriarch. But he has soft corners, like adopting Rahul and raising him equal to his biological son. Other than those who knew, no one could even tell that Rahul was adopted. He's willing to give his business, inheritance, and entire patriarchal lineage to someone who is not his flesh and blood (something alien to traditional South Asian patriarchs.) But Rahul crosses a line when he marries Anjali.

As viewers, we are furious at Yash Raichand, but we somehow get his decision. We know it is not personal against Anjali but a weird deference to the class hierarchy. Even if we hate and want to dismantle the class hierarchy, we deeply understand why some elders bow to it. We know and expect to navigate around it. We are sad when Rahul leaves his life and family behind for Anjali, but we support it. Rahul doesn't leave because he's angry at Yash for disrespecting Anjali - he leaves because he knows he's broken a sociocultural barrier and doesn't know when it can be mended again.

Megan rubs people the wrong way because she came into the royal family with her rugged American individualism. From day one, the only thing that mattered was her dignity and self-respect, not the traditions, expectations, and pressures of the royal family. Not that a person's dignity and self-respect don't matter - it is of utmost importance - but it's a delicate balance when your family represents the face of a nation.

The British press had been harsh to Diana, Fergie, and Kate. Diana and Kate eventually won over the press with their poise and grace. In Megan's defense, Diana and Kate never had to fight racist statements and presumptions. It is one thing to face class snobbery and another to endure racism.

So Harry and Megan were right to walk away. The royal family expects the daughter-in-law to sink or swim - either win over the people or perish. Diana and Kate won people over. Fergie learned to live and revel in the negative tabloid attention. Since her criticism was entwined with racism, it made sense to step away rather than try to overcome it.

But unlike Rahul and Anjali, who walked away silently, Harry and Megan drew attention to their exit. Rahul and Anjali could have easily called out Yash Raichand and his patriarchy and elitism. Rahul could have called out Yash for harboring caste and class biases and mistreating/looking down on Anjali and her family. Nor does Anjali expect him to. She doesn't take the family's judgment of her class specifically as a judgment of her. Even though she has been intimidated and insulted by Yash Raichand, she's heartbroken that she's the cause of a rift in the family. All Rahul and Anjali yearn for are to repair the broken relationships, no strings attached. On the other hand, Megan took everything personally, called out everyone, and expected Harry to do the same. It doesn't seem Megan and Harry want to mend their relationships. They want unconditional apologies or acknowledgment of wrongdoing.

Objectively, Megan and Harry did nothing wrong. They were in a bad situation; they left it and called it out. Subjectively, from specific sociocultural lenses, Megan and Harry broke every expectation of tradition and family. Those who were raised with the sociocultural lens of making sacrifices for family see Megan and Harry as the villain. Those who were raised with the sociocultural lens that individual rights trump the collective see Megan and Harry as the villains. And those that have been exposed to both sides can see both sides.

1254629 thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#37

sick of these two attention seekers!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".