Originally posted by: NSharma01
I root for Sairat and show's narrative is clear that Virat and Sai love each other so I don't doubt them there because the writing is from that standpoint.
Virat and Pakhi's dynamics are different. You see people have forgiven Jagtap, even though he is a hard-core criminal, in terms of characterization there's nothing he hasn't done but people have forgiven him. Similarly, Pakhi did crimes but Virat and his family forgave him
I'll give you one more example - Sai holding police officers at gun point and escaping jail is a crime too but FD doesn't want justice for those police officers or punishment for Sai.
I know there's justification for both Sai and Jagtap but same justification comes from Virat for Pakhi
This is human nature. If you like someone, you are biased towards them and in every situation, you are waiting for them to say they have changed to forgive them.
Pratap and Ruhi is a temporary track and Pratap is irritating so good that Ruhi has moved on
JM cannot be compared to P.
I have always maintained that JM being around Sai and Savi is utterly ridiculous. No matter how changed he maybe, no person will alllow her father and brothers murderer to be anywhere in the vicinity. Its a terrible plot. Some of the audience accepts him or forgives him only because he is a really good actor and from the point of view of relationships he maintains a clear boundary. He is not closely involved in Sai's life.
Sai has not encouraged his involvement. She continues to recall and loathe the fact that he killed her father but he served his time so she allows him to exist. She has not encouraged him meeting Savi or gifting her things or involving himself in anything related to her.
Ps so called change of heart is not even believable. She is a pathetic actor. If she had mainatained a distance and exited Vs life and was only present peripherally, people may have accepted it. If the narrative was about Sai assuming P was Vs wife and still in his life, it'd be a different matter
V has married her, he has gone on honeymoon, he has crossed all lines.
Claiming that V has forgiven P despite the fact that his "love" Sai is DEAD despite knowing it is HER and his relationship/equation with her and has gone as far as marrying her and now made promises to her to be her husband in every which way despite their "deal" is an insult to any so-called "love"
He can forget and co-exist but forgiving and accepting her as a friend, and wife even though they had clear terms shows that he never held any value for Sai.
Sai has loved V sincerely and she has to get over it but just because she has good memories of their past , doesnt mean his behavior is excusable. He has inflicted wounds on her which cannot fully heal. He has scarred her, made her suffer, she has had to live all alone while he always has his family.
Bringing up sai's actions of desperation after being unfairly jailed in the first place is preposterous imo.
The way V imprisoned her without a warrant or genuine reason- just because he felt "angry" is ridiculous for an IPS officer and the fact that every official there including DIG supported his unprofessional behavior and misuse of power and position is even more appalling.
Edited by Nja91 - 2 years ago
1.7k