Originally posted by: Kumuda-123
Agree that writers intended to sell it as love triangle.
But how audience r claiming virat loves sai despite him being cruel to her.
And claiming he has nothing for pakhi despite him initiating many advances towards her, respecting her, doing everything except consummation.
What if makers intention was to show he is indeed moving on with pakhi genuinely but circumstances will force him towards sai not because he wanted to have sai in his life.
When has Virat not been a toxic fellow? If we go by real life, Sai will never return to him under any cost. People are trying to look past the execution and see what the writers are trying to convey (myself included)....but it is also understandable that it may be hard to do so when Virat acts like a villain.
So keeping these liberties....if we try to answer the question Does Virat love Sai (on paper)?
Honestly speaking, you can look at it anyways..depends on people
Some may feel he has moved away from Sai, some may feel the feelings are there somewhere..they have left it ambiguous to create that uncertainity. Both viewpoints are not wrong IMO. (Actual correct answer is he never loved Sai in the first place...guy loves himself🤪). And in the same vein, will he have eventually moved on with Pakhi - that's also open to interpretation. Right now, he has not moved on with Pakhi.
But eventually, they will show Sai & Virat ending up together - either their buried feelings will come to the surface or they will re-kindle the feelings that are dead. If we remove the toxic content, & the lack of monologue from V....writing is actually good...I can clearly see a theme. It is not the typical ITV style of soulmate romance..it is showing that people do drift apart. Right now, both Sai & Virat have put aside their personal agendas and operating as parents first. It is intolerable because of two reasons...1) Virat & Pakhi are disgusting people 2) The unnecessary toxicity