Well done Savi … Shabaash ⭐️⭐️⭐️ - Page 20

Originally posted by: Moor278

I know Jags doesn't treat Sai like sister... he is still moping for her... but he is okay with being Saavis mama.... so by extension Sai and Jags cannot marry even if he wants to 😔... that's too horrible.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Jagtap will be implied soon. Itna logical nahi hai Ghum. There is no other reason why he is brought post leap

And i like Siddharth 😁

That's what, I'm saying.

Savi saying ki she hasn't seen her dad will be assumed as, sai has hidden about jagtap being savi's father from savi.

I'm waiting for that👍🏼

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Woh Ashwini ka bus chale toh woh bed ke saamne stool lagake baithke dekhegi ki key lock meiin barabar Gaya ya nahi

Originally posted by: Moor278

I want CN to accuse Sai but not V... 😔

He has to stand by her... even if he believes it's a child of assault. If the Ramayan reference is to be continued... Ram/V will not accuse her.

Hopefully Moor!

Because if CVs really want to show V's journey, this approach will be best suited.

But going by whatever crap has been dished out in the name of second marriage and moving on, I find it a little difficult that V will stay out of the frame.

Bcz after P and Mohit, only V has seen Jags with Savi.

First few scenes - he spotted Jags with Sai only.

Be it during his treatment or when they dropped Sai home.

Originally posted by: Moor278

I want CN to accuse Sai but not V... 😔

He has to stand by her... even if he believes it's a child of assault. If the Ramayan reference is to be continued... Ram/V will not accuse her.

Ramayan reference was only to show Sai turmoil about hiding who is father. It had nothing to do with Virat. He married another woman, he can not be compared even situationally to Ram.

Plus he Slept letting PL hold his hand after playing Ram. If that skit evoked any emotion he would not have. IMO They efficiently showed how Virat is unaffected about Sai.

Originally posted by: RejiBuji

Who knows maybe she will hide under their bed to watch actions n listen their sound

Originally posted by: RejiBuji

Who knows maybe she will hide under their bed to watch actions n listen their sound

kaunse actions .. she will see bhabhi using a device when her devar virat is snoring away .. 😀😀

What if he neighs like a horse or grunts like a pig. Or just goes like a fata hua silencer

[/QUOTE

Stallion aur woh bhi viru .. bahut umeed laga di tumne is ghode pe ..
itni umeed toh sai ne bhi nahi kiya hoga ..

Originally posted by: Sab07

Ramayan reference was only to show Sai turmoil about hiding who is father. It had nothing to do with Virat. He married another woman, he can not be compared even situationally to Ram.

Plus he Slept letting PL hold his hand after playing Ram. If that skit evoked any emotion he would not have. IMO They efficiently showed how Virat is unaffected about Sai.

V is not Ram... never said he was... The reference is being maintained on a broader scale according to me... if the uttarkaand in skit happened for Sai... The questions Saavi asked V were the extension of that skit. An uttarkand 2.0

That Ram could easily accept his children because he had not failed that way... V cannot even if he wants to... that's why he is not Ram. He has to sort this mess now if wants to be part of Saavis life. And only he can do that. Sai can only watch.

About the hand holding.. I agree... no words 👎🏼

P.S. I still don't think they will go custody case route. Since all Chavans are criminals. It will implicate them which Vanku cannot afford to show.

Even the newly minted DCP will lose his job. 👍🏼