Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum
at work, so cant hear the song. I assume that song has a lot of technical difficulty and shows Manna Da's technical prowess? Yes, Manna Da had great technical prowess, perhaps more than anyone else.... based on my passing knowledge of Hindi music.
of course there are exceptions. There almost always are in any kind of practical generalization. But even your example only proves my general point (and it was only a general point). Inspite of being classically trained, and having the ability to perform more variations and vocal calisthenics than Kishore Da, outside some circles, I dont think he had the level of mass appeal that Kishore Da had, or for that matter Rafi Sahab, Mukesh Sahab and Hemant Da . Kishore Da won 8 filmfare awards, more than all other male singers! And that was the general point I was making- variations have generally not been a significant factor in male singer's success. Critics might rave about someone's technical prowess, but at the end of the day it's about reaching audiences. Also, it's like essay writing. Vocabulary might be important, but it seldom is the determinant of how good someone else's essay is. Vocabulary, vocal calisthenics etc are a means to the end, not the end in themselves imo.
Also consider: head to head, same song sung by Hemant Da/ Kishore Da or a female singer, the male version was more popular even though the female singer used lots more variation. The Kudrat song was one example. Kishore Da's version stands out for that intangible element of being able to convey deep emotion and he hit the notes straight without all the fancy variations taken by the female. Na Tum Humein Jaan is another example. Hemant Da's version stands out for the unique manly/ romantic combination in his voice, and is still remembered more than the female's.
sorry for the long essay. Got carried away.😭
218