Speechless !!! - Page 31

Ye kaunsi movie hai 😭🤣

I want to watch this !

Waise mast forbidden OS likhna chaye 🤣

No show right now running on any channel is promoting goodness winning over evil but they show evil will win whether it is imlie(pathetic....no happiness...)... anupama, yrkkh or ghum...in naagin ekta even butchered God🤢

Originally posted by: kuchnaakahoo

What is sai saying in the promo. The voice is really unclear.

She is saying "Main ab woh Sai nahi rahi jisse aap jaanti thi. Par aap ab bhi wahi Pakhi hain jo sirf Virat se pyaar karti thi...aur ab toh aap unki patni bhi ho gayin"

There is a clearer version of the promo spmewhere in the SM thread

I dont understand UM. She says V has moved ahead in life then why is she pointing out Sai is affected by V talking to Vinu's aai. I can see that she is confused why Virat beat up Gulbya and his men for maligning Sai, but didnt try to find Sai all these years. But now he is married and should steer clear of linking him to Sai. Before too, after knowing Vinu has 'aai', she still brought up kapus flower🤪. Since Vinu said he is injured, he assured P he is fine and rejected her from coming over. He just cut her off🤣

V is seeing Sai leaving the house as action but it was Sai's reaction to his action. Which he have not realized after all these years and asking the reason Sai has never called him. Facepalm. Sai is clear she has not done wrong and V was the one at fault by siding with P. Certainly with how P is now, V will not see himself or P as wrong.

V didnt think Sai gave birth to Savi so he asked where she found Savi and whose child she is. This is based on doctor saying Sai will not be able to carry a child to term. So he might assumed Savi is adopted, just like he did. But the next question went on the danger zone. Who is the father? And Sai saw where his questions were directing too and moved away. But V is not gonna let go easily, especially not after his encounter with Gulbya. When Sai said she gave birth to Savi, V's reaction to it was 👍🏼. But he used the word moved on in life before asking who Savi's father is. That indicates he didnt consider the possibility of Savi being his. The only excuse I could think of is Savi not recognizing him as Baba, so he assumed he is not the father. Probably Sai used the same logic too for not considering Vinu as hers. Vinu lives in CN but didnt recognize her and has a mumma. During Devkit track too she wrongly assumed Madhuri as Pulkit's wife because of the word 'ma' as she calls Usha as maushi. But here P is married to V😒. V clearly uses different lens for himself and Sai. He thought Sai has easily moved on because of Savi, but thats how he also seem to others with Vinu and his mumma. Another red alert was him saying Vinu is his child just like Savi is Sai's. Savi is Sai's biological child but Vinu is not his biological child (for now). Sai's argument seem valid when she said V would have found her if he searched for her after the accident. Till now we are not shown how Sai and V concluded Vinu died in the accident. Probably when Vinu is found 'alive', Sai will believe V did search for them? Sai did register V saying her name was in the dead list but his zinda lash condition didnt correlate with Vinu's 'supposed' age. Thats why Sai says V had moved on far in his life. V was right, anybody can name their child as Vinayak, just like the child he found in orphanage. But Sai has named their child as Savi, the name they had thought for their child. And thats probably why she was hurt thinking V named his boy as Vinayak too. Neither V cleared Vinu is adopted nor he connected the name Savi to be their child. And Sai is too hurt to disclose V is Savi's father. Dont know what V was trying to convey for so long but both are making assumption and allegation with half informations.

Finally the topic of their Vinu came today. Sai acknowledged V was in takleef because of losing Vinayak but V dismissed Sai's takleef because of Savi's existence. And again V accused Sai of going away with Vinu without acknowledging his part. Bhaisaab, saying if Sai crossed the house dehleez means cutting relationship between them does not come under trying to stop her. Sai said clearly she would not have left if he didnt bail P and bring her back to CN. He was right that the issue is not P but them. It was his action regarding P and how it is perceived by others. But again whenever P's topic come between them he always dismisses it and puts the blame on Sai. And for god sake, Vinu's 'death' is caused by accident. Its nobodys fault. Neither Sai nor Virat. Anyway, both handled the situation well with the kids.

V's thappad and dhulai instigated Gulbya to a more dangerous zone. Just like he did with Jagtap before.Moor Now Gulbya is after their blood. Savi is such a fighter just like Sai. She was beating the goons with her toy bat.

V watching Sai while Vinu's 'mumma' called and confidently telling Sai to ask him anything shows that he really didnt realize his image is of a married man with a child. For him, he has been true to Sai in his heart. Just like giving Shruti the tag of Mrs Chavan and his name to Sahas as father doesnt mean betraying Sai. Good that Sai put her name as both mother and father. So Chavan's cannot claim rights on Savi. And I wanted this too for what V did with Sahas.

You had me at Mohit trying to take over the business and shady deal🤣🤣. He doesnt have that much talent. He is a follower, not an initiator. He needs someone to push him. Before it was Sai. Now its P. He couldnt handle the legal case and asked P to handle it. Even Ashwini said Mohit will handle the remaining choti moti kaam. BK doesnt taunt him like before but he is not celebrated either.

Dont know how to describe the conversation between them two. He was supposed to be hesitant but his body language didnt seem to convey that. And P's reaction to his thank you and sorry speech is unreadable midway. Its like she doesnt understand what he is saying or is waiting for him to finish his line🤪

Originally posted by: purplegirl7

I dont understand UM. She says V has moved ahead in life then why is she pointing out Sai is affected by V talking to Vinu's aai. I can see that she is confused why Virat beat up Gulbya and his men for maligning Sai, but didnt try to find Sai all these years. But now he is married and should steer clear of linking him to Sai. Before too, after knowing Vinu has 'aai', she still brought up kapus flower🤪. Since Vinu said he is injured, he assured P he is fine and rejected her from coming over. He just cut her off🤣

V is seeing Sai leaving the house as action but it was Sai's reaction to his action. Which he have not realized after all these years and asking the reason Sai has never called him. Facepalm. Sai is clear she has not done wrong and V was the one at fault by siding with P. Certainly with how P is now, V will not see himself or P as wrong.

V didnt think Sai gave birth to Savi so he asked where she found Savi and whose child she is. This is based on doctor saying Sai will not be able to carry a child to term. So he might assumed Savi is adopted, just like he did. But the next question went on the danger zone. Who is the father? And Sai saw where his questions were directing too and moved away. But V is not gonna let go easily, especially not after his encounter with Gulbya. When Sai said she gave birth to Savi, V's reaction to it was 👍🏼. But he used the word moved on in life before asking who Savi's father is. That indicates he didnt consider the possibility of Savi being his. The only excuse I could think of is Savi not recognizing him as Baba, so he assumed he is not the father. Probably Sai used the same logic too for not considering Vinu as hers. Vinu lives in CN but didnt recognize her and has a mumma. During Devkit track too she wrongly assumed Madhuri as Pulkit's wife because of the word 'ma' as she calls Usha as maushi. But here P is married to V😒. V clearly uses different lens for himself and Sai. He thought Sai has easily moved on because of Savi, but thats how he also seem to others with Vinu and his mumma. Another red alert was him saying Vinu is his child just like Savi is Sai's. Savi is Sai's biological child but Vinu is not his biological child (for now). Sai's argument seem valid when she said V would have found her if he searched for her after the accident. Till now we are not shown how Sai and V concluded Vinu died in the accident. Probably when Vinu is found 'alive', Sai will believe V did search for them? Sai did register V saying her name was in the dead list but his zinda lash condition didnt correlate with Vinu's 'supposed' age. Thats why Sai says V had moved on

V watching Sai while Vinu's 'mumma' called and confidently telling Sai to ask him anything shows that he really didnt realize his image is of a married man with a child. For him, he has been true to Sai in his heart. Just like giving Shruti the tag of Mrs Chavan and his name to Sahas as father doesnt mean betraying Sai. Good that Sai put her name as both mother and father. So Chavan's cannot claim rights on Savi. And I wanted this too for what V did with Sahas.

yeah this is the problem with virat .. he has very poor EQ .. it is always him first ..very selfish man …

I am glad Sai paid him back with the same coin ..when she refused to put his name as father to his biological child

( for Shruti track )

She refused to involve him in her pregnancy journey and also raising the infant in the early child hood year

( payback for Vinayak and pakhi track ) he had considered giving the child to pakhi ..had not considered the child was her only blood relation in the world

Today sai has a biological child living with her .. it’s a payback from god for keeping her as an orphan for a . Good many years of her life

Originally posted by: msin

yeah this is the problem with virat .. he has very poor EQ .. it is always him first ..very selfish man …

I am glad Sai paid him back with the same coin ..when she refused to put his name as father to his biological child

( for Shruti track )

She refused to involve him in her pregnancy journey and also raising the infant in the early child hood year

( payback for Vinayak and pakhi track ) he had considered giving the child to pakhi ..had not considered the child was her only blood relation in the world

Today sai has a biological child living with her .. it’s a payback from god for keeping her as an orphan for a . Good many years of her life

ooooo I loved those payback aspects… 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳

kuch toh justice hua! Thank you!!!!

Too much of everything is ..............

Thats an old saying right? But how does that fit in here?

Sai and V loved each other, and it grew new bounds over time. So much that it exists in after so many years of separation. The desire to be with each other..................to have the other to oneself came stronger with the love. Trust came along the way, as they shared a life, a relationship, a journey together. Not an easy one, but they did with their share of ups and downs.

3 strong pillars in a relationship well established, what could possibly go wrong?

The proportion!

While love and desire soared high, trust staggered under the pressure to hold its footing.

It’s ironical, how as humans the very pure form of emotion gets diluted as more emotions and needs get attached to love. The need to have someone to belong to us, the strong desire, gives ride to FEAR. The fear of not having that desire fulfilled is so strong that it overpowers any rational thinking. Even the trust. All that remains is fear and insecurity. Constant validation is demanded to keep it under control. Paradoxical, that while one is constantly seeking those confirmations, he/she refuses to see the clear signs..believe that they are indeed blessed...that it is true. It's like, One prays to God, and it gets answered when God himself says "You are meant for each other, and no one can separate you", but they will still start finding arguments to prove to God that "Look Dude.. you are wrong".

Thats what fear of losing can do to people.

Sai is no logical counters for UM, but she continues to stand her ground. V is looking around the house to find that one pic, one proof. Unable to bear the thought that Sai has moved on, yet looking for proofs for his doubts.

The fire has been simmering for long and had to come out. V is the first to ask. Again a stark character contrast. V is always expressive of his pain and calls it out loud. Sai only does when she is provoked to an extent. She prefers to deal with it on her own and keep it within herself. This was evident when V said "Poochon na". He is just waiting for her to ask to spill it out. His pain, his longing and suffering. They are really not sure what they are asking and what they are addressing. It's a bitter concoction. They are hurt and they are hurting each other in return

It was clear that V is holding something crucial about his marriage with P. And he is confident that Sai will buy it. This would have been simpler if V had said what it is. He is back to being "Jalebi". He just says "Kabse main tumhe kuch batane ki koshish kar raha hoon, par tum sun nahi rahi ho?" Bhai, kya batana chahte the? Aaj tak hum bhi nahi samajh paaye.

Both are stubborn. But what makes V more wrong here. V has Vinu, Sai has Savi. Till now V was expecting Savi to be adopted, like Vinu is (Since he still believed that Sai can't give birth). Once Sai confirmed that she gave birth to Savi, he went soft and moving away to look at Savi. But then he was back into accusation mode. This is what I was referring to. One moment he was happy that Sai could conceive, hopeful....but then his mind refused to believe the obvious. This is what I mentioned in the beginning. They are already so negative in their minds, so fearful to get hurt, that they are refusing to believe the obvious positive indications. Sai was taken aback by V's question. Rightly so. He doubted her, and the paternity of their child. And that closed off Sai. If V could believe that Sai could conceive and deliver, he would have believed if she said Savi was their child. Why dis she not say it? Because V asked the wrong question. If he believed that she could have a baby, why did he not think that he could be the father? Funny right? That's an unfulfilled dream, yet when the possibility shows up, one refuses to believe.

V on the other hand is justifying his stand with nothing. It has been clearly stated that he is married. What else is Sai to believe then? If his mother, his family and the entire world believes it, why can't Sai? But that is the problem. Why did Sai believe? How can she believe it?

Demanding trust when you fail to return the favours. Very similar to SH track. V kept asking Sai to trust him, but gave nothing else for her to trust. Today he is doing the same.

Sai was hurt by V's question. She obviously never believed him to think that he would even doubt about Savi's parentage. V again goes wrong here.

It was a chain reaction. And in this all the connecting arguments were lost. Assuming to be dead, not searching ...all that was supposed to clear the air was discarded. Because there was something more important in play.Their loyalty and exclusivity to each other.

P remains the trigger, but it is frustrating that V still refuses to acknowledge it. His view of her over the years may be a reason. Now that he has seen her change, it makes Sai all the more wrong in his eyes. But he still misses the point.

Vinayak saying "Main to yahin hoon" is a sign. The parents believing they lost their baby, and he is very much amongst them, just that they are unaware.

Precap - Let it play

Such a beautiful writeup

You write like a dream❤️

Absolutely amazing review as always sherry❤️

Love this.

Whats your take on sai and pakhi's meeting? Did you watch the new promo?

I need to know about your predictions😀👍