Aik Sitam Aur(Thread 5) Usama Khan, Anmol Baloch (ARY)- Page 102

Originally posted by: vibha28

I know it’s not an allegation, I mean the way he talked. Would you say your mother or father were careless behind their back? My parents have called me careless multiple times but to my face never behind my back. I do the same not to parents but to brothers, sisters, again to their face though.

It’s not even trust it’s about respect. He is not as bad as hamza but I can’t let that one go. He shouldn’t have if he respected Ushna but he is arrogant and a brat too so maybe he didn’t get that and in his arrogance he said that. He is not as bad as hamza but that was disappointing when he was going so well.

There are high chances that our parents talk to each other about our carelessness in our absence. Parents will obviously talk about their children to each other and not necessarily only the good behaviour. They might talk about our negative trades as well. It's not talking behind someone's back or gossiping because they clearly don't mean any harm on us.

I don't know if you have kids but won't you talk about your kid's behaviour to your husband when the kid is not around?

Two people taking behind someone's back and two people talking about someone in their absense are two different things. We all talk about people in our lives to someone else when that person is not around us but it not necessarily means we are back bitching or gossiping or taking behind their back.

Anmol also enjoyed hand chemistry ☺️

Originally posted by: Rubabbb

Im so jealous right now😒

Even in summer the maximum temperature in kerala will be around 32-33.

I stayed in Delhi for an year and it was a nightmare during Summers.

Originally posted by: mango.falooda

I would agree and disagree with you -- so there has to be a certain level of comfort and maturity to the personality as well as the relationship where you can point out flaws and not have the other person take it to heart. in your family, it is lovely that you are able to speak so plainly but there are many relationships where it is not there.

this means that words like careless will be taken as a big deal and as an insult. family wars will erupt. so that is the case here with shehroze/ushna/zainab/naima. shehroze does not have a close relationship with zainab and it is still very formal. he also hasn't quite developed the type of bond with ushna where he can be that open. so this is ripe for misunderstanding.

❤️❤️❤️

You have put it perfectly. This will create misunderstandings, I just hope in his anger he doesn’t bring up her mother or past and say he should have listened to his mother. I have this feeling he will this will make his tears even more worthy I guess?

Only Sarabjeet from Choti Sardarni was an amazing husband. Truly loved that guy - gem of a man. Never changed his personality.

Originally posted by: spnfan

Even in summer the maximum temperature in kerala will be around 32-33.

I stayed in Delhi for an year and it was a nightmare during Summers.

Fahrenheit? Or degrees?

I went to Punjab one summer and I never went again 😂😂😂

The story which anmol shared of hand holding, it seems hotter with slow version of it with song "Talab talab "☺️ cant believe anmol shared this

https://instagram.com/stories/holicsthetic/2871559719291068304?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=

Originally posted by: spnfan

There are high chances that our parents talk to each other about our carelessness in our absence. Parents will obviously talk about their children to each other and not necessarily only the good behaviour. They might talk about our negative trades as well. It's not talking behind someone's back or gossiping because they clearly don't mean any harm on us.

I don't know if you have kids but won't you talk about your kid's behaviour to your husband when the kid is not around?

Two people taking behind someone's back and two people talking about someone in their absense are two different things. We all talk about people in our lives to someone else when that person is not around us but it not necessarily means we are back bitching or gossiping or taking behind their back.

again, I would agree and disagree with you. kekeke. 😆

both you and vibha are right in different ways. so what you are talking about is discussing an issue as a family and yes, that is healthy. parents should be teaming together to talking about how they will deal with their children. in that respect, rafaqat and raeesa have a good marriage. then when parents have come up with a game plan, usually they then sit down and address the child. that is normal and healthy parenting style. like you said, all good.

now what vibha said is something else together -- that is creating conflict where you are not talking about the issue with the person concerned. instead, you do a gossip chain where you talk to everyone else except the person involved. so there are several ways this plays out -- either the goal is to turn everyone around against the person or you are trying to make yourself look good or you don't trust the person or feel confident about approaching them. vibha's point is that if you have a problem/fight with person A, then you shouldn't be chatting with person B. that isn't going to solve the issue. instead, the issue is with A and so therefore, needs to be addressed to A. again, what she shared about her family's philosophy and sharing is wise -- in many families, wars erupt where family members talk to everyone else except the person involved.

Originally posted by: spnfan

There are high chances that our parents talk to each other about our carelessness in our absence. Parents will obviously talk about their children to each other and not necessarily only the good behaviour. They might talk about our negative trades as well. It's not talking behind someone's back or gossiping because they clearly don't mean any harm on us.

I don't know if you have kids but won't you talk about your kid's behaviour to your husband when the kid is not around?

Two people taking behind someone's back and two people talking about someone in their absense are two different things. We all talk about people in our lives to someone else when that person is not around us but it not necessarily means we are back bitching or gossiping or taking behind their back.

I hope my parents don’t as that will be everything against they have taught us 😂😂 but they have to our faces many many times and we knew we were.

Kid, parent, and spouse love is very different. Ushna and his relationship is still very new and it’s not as secure and this won’t help matters. He thinks she is careless and he is a madman when he is angry we know that so I pity Ushna. That’s why I hope she gives it back to him and throw Zunaisha in his face. And no tears. And lock the bedroom door too.

Originally posted by: mango.falooda

again, I would agree and disagree with you. kekeke. 😆

both you and vibha are right in different ways. so what you are talking about is discussing an issue as a family and yes, that is healthy. parents should be teaming together to talking about how they will deal with their children. in that respect, rafaqat and raeesa have a good marriage. then when parents have come up with a game plan, usually they then sit down and address the child. that is normal and healthy parenting style. like you said, all good.

now what vibha said is something else together -- that is creating conflict where you are not talking about the issue with the person concerned. instead, you do a gossip chain where you talk to everyone else except the person involved. so there are several ways this plays out -- either the goal is to turn everyone around against the person or you are trying to make yourself look good or you don't trust the person or feel confident about approaching them. vibha's point is that if you have a problem/fight with person A, then you shouldn't be chatting with person B. that isn't going to solve the issue. instead, the issue is with A and so therefore, needs to be addressed to A. again, what she shared about her family's philosophy and sharing is wise -- in many families, wars erupt where family members talk to everyone else except the person involved.

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

OMG can you be my therapist please? You explained it perfectly. This is exactly what I mean. You are fuking brilliant, how do you do that? 👍👍👍👍

Originally posted by: Renee.Clare

I guess, here they havent butchered the male leaopd like they did with Hamza. Shehroz was always a mad man ,impulsive, possessive ,stubborn and a complete fool when it came to his mom. Yes he did show some development but they all were temporary only beacuse he had hardly fallen for Ushna and in any case he did not want her go. The guy never changed actually, whatever changes were there , only was for him wanting Ushna in his life. Now, he has gotten her ,so he is back to his original self.

The development in Shehroz wasn't temporary. At last he has a spine to take a stand against his mother when she is wrong. He didn't bow down against hunger strike as well because the theory that you'll get many wives, but not mother is totally bullshit. There's a reason Naima has been hiding her real self when she was openly cursing Ushna-zainab. She has presented herself on right side and Zainab on wrong. He is standing with right thing according to him. Naima has realised that he won't be following her order blindly anymore and that's the problem with her. She had taken years to spoil him and he has fallen in love so badly that he has started learning moral lessons. What if he start giving more importance to Wahab one day ?

There's no doubt he is a spoilt brat and think that Zainab should be the servant of his mom when he can very much afford nurses. Old habit never dies. In case of jewelry, he isn't using common sense that Zainab has no reason to steal jewelry and expect Ushna to go fully against her mom without any proof when he himself was sober with Naima when she was openly acting like a vamp and giving order to divorce Ushna. When Naima will get exposed, still he won't behave with her the way he expected Ushna to behave with Zainab just for a piece of khandani shit. So yes, there's a double standard and hypocrisy.