Cricket Forum Members' Chat Club - Page 63

Originally posted by: SoniRSippu21

Some arguments in favour of euthanasia include:

Human beings should have the right to be able to decide when and how they die (self-determination).

Euthanasia enables a person to die with dignity and in control of their situation.

Death is a private matter and the state should not interfere with the individual's right to die.

It is expensive to keep people alive when there is no cure for their illness.

Euthanasia would release precious resources to treat people who could live.

Family and friends would be spared the pain of seeing their loved one suffer a long-drawn-out death.

Some non-religious arguments against euthanasia include:

euthanasia would weaken society's respect for the value and importance of human life

proper palliative care is available which reduces or removes the need for people to be in pain

it would lead to worse care for the terminally ill

it would put too much power in the hands of doctors, and damage the trust between patient and doctor

some people may feel pressured to request euthanasia by family, friends or doctors, when it isn't what they really want

it would undermine the commitment of doctors and nurses to save lives

it would discourage the search for new cures and treatments for the terminally ill

some people unexpectedly recover some people may change their mind about euthanasia and be unable to tell anyone

There are two Hindu points of view on euthanasia. By helping to end a painful life a person is performing a good deed and so fulfilling their moral obligations. Euthanasia may also be acceptable if it is used for selfless motives. On the other hand, by helping to end a life, even one filled with suffering, a person is disturbing the timing of the cycle of death and rebirth. This is a bad thing to do, and those involved in the euthanasia will take on the remaining karma of the patient. Death is a natural process, and will come in time.

I agree

Honestly

For me police should have a background check if they think removing the human from Euthanasia is not benefiting someone

Then family has right to take that decision bcoz at time property dispute ki wajah se bhi family wants to take away it from that person.

Originally posted by: Mish14bir26

yes me too. Members on ghum forum at first thought that I am 15-16 years old kid🤣🤣. I know i am a little bit chulbuli par teenager hi bana dita muhje🤣🤣

Omg 15-16😲 damn😲 they r crazy. I had thought u r in early 20s so dw

Originally posted by: Palak2812

I agree

Honestly

For me police should have a background check if they think removing the human from Euthanasia is not benefiting someone

Then family has right to take that decision bcoz at time property dispute ki wajah se bhi family wants to take away it from that person.

Exactly👍🏼 and this happens a lot @ bold. Which is sad

Originally posted by: RainOfDew

Koi baat nhi chote hone ke bhi fayde hain😆

Chote hone ki he fayde hain

Originally posted by: Palak2812

Yeah 😎👍🏼

And i am the exception😎🤣 all rest have IPhones🤣😎

Originally posted by: RainOfDew

@b: me too🤣 It has better features than iPhone😆

Sabse important girne padne ka tension nahi and easier to use

&

Sasta bhi hain 🤣

Originally posted by: SoniRSippu21

I dont understand why ppl watch ITV with stupid content🤣

Yeh bhi sahi baat hain 🤣

Originally posted by: Palak2812

Sabse important girne padne ka tension nahi and easier to use

&

Sasta bhi hain 🤣

This is the best part🤣

Originally posted by: Palak2812

Yeh bhi sahi baat hain 🤣

🤣 🤣 ya only aunties n uncles (in kusum case) watches all this.

Originally posted by: SoniRSippu21

My naana, maama, maasi all r lawyers n now my maasi's daughter also doing law 😃

Mainly in my family (dad's side) its either business/finance or IT😆

Itne saare lawyers 😍

Having lawyers in family always helps