Originally posted by: Physics_girl
 
Even if you ignore the rest , are the characters of Meets not ruined too?
I mean MA not having a bit of trust on MH even after she did so much for him and the family. Is he still a good ML? Doesn't it come between the two Meets?
MH giving self respect prabachans to Sunaina par khud wohi doormat hi ban gayi. 
Ok let us consider she doesn't so easily want to give up on her marriage, done. 
But when she is blamed to be a thief, should not she defend herself better? She should at least, I am saying 'at the least' give him silent treatment. Ek din Khana nahi khane se mar nahi jayega MA. Isn't this about between the two Meets?
Uske baad should not MA 'at the least' try to gather proofs or try to find out the truth even if he doesn't trust before giving word that she would apologise? Isn't it related to how a husband treats his wife? Leave husband-wife kisi aur ko v esse blame karna ka right nahi hai. Doesn't this too consider the bond between the two Meets?
Why should MH even agree to prove herself ? Isn't divorce a situation between Meet and Meet? Why can't she tell Babita to ask MA himself then? Can't she directly say ki what what her sister did? Should not she question Babita how is the chance equal? Should she not point out that she already proved so many times?
I am no one to tell you what to watch and what not to watch. Nor that I intend to. I am just pointing out the questions I have in my mind since you are saying that you want to see only for the Meets ignoring the rest of the family drama.