Who is going to leave a bigger legacy: Deepika or Katrina - Page 2

Originally posted by: harun98

Katrina would be more remembered as the sexy white pretty lady, and deepika will be forgotten once she leaves bollywood, none of them come close to any 90s or 80s or 70s actresse who left memorable legacy.

Doubt that. Deepika is no Sridevi but she still has had a good career with plenty of memorable movies. Doubt one of the top actresses of the 2010s will be forgotten, whether you like her or not

Originally posted by: harun98

Katrina would be more remembered as the sexy white pretty lady, and deepika will be forgotten once she leaves bollywood, none of them come close to any 90s or 80s or 70s actresse who left memorable legacy.

I think Katrina might be forgotten because there have been so many item girls and she is no madhuri to be remembered for her dancing alone neither is she an ethereal beauty like Aish

Now When coming to deepika,she is considered one of the most beautiful in this generation and she has so manyyy iconic movies,she is gonna be remembered as the biggest heroine in 2010s whether you like it or not

Katrina hasnt played any iconic character

Only different is deepika an average actress who can act at least better than katrina, otherwise even in star of the decade she finished second position to kat which is quite embarrassing.

70s ruled by hemaji, 80s sridevi, 90s madhuri, 2000s ash or rani, 2010s to 19 kat, deepika's name is not even in the list of number 1 female stars of the decade lol

Originally posted by: uroka

Okay name one iconic character played by Katrina

Naina talwar alone overshadows any work katrina has done

Originally posted by: Journey95

You are looking at things in a simplistic way. 90s weren't just ruled by Madhuri considering after 1994 she only had flops apart from DTPH. Kajol had a better career in the second half with DDLJ, Gupt, Ishq and KKHH etc.

In the 2000s Aish and Rani are good contenders for Nr.1 but Preity was going strong as well (better than Aish for a few years until the latter recovered with Dhoom 2).

Saying only Kat ruled the 2010s is ridiculous, she declined a lot and gave big flops like Phantom, BBD & Fitoor and Jaga Jasoos. She was better in some years like 2010-2012 but DP was dominating in 2013-2015 and 2018. She definitely belongs in the conversation of Nr.1 actress of the decade

I'm talking overall who ruled majority part of the decade, Madhuri was number from 1991 until 1995, which is 5 years dominance, karishma ruled from 1996, 1997 and 1999. so overall madhuri ruled the decade. Kar who had a brief decline post 2015 was number 1 majority part of the decade. Deepika rised much later than Kat

Originally posted by: harun98

I'm talking overall who ruled majority part of the decade, Madhuri was number from 1991 until 1995, which is 5 years dominance, karishma ruled from 1996, 1997 and 1999. so overall madhuri ruled the decade. Kar who had a brief decline post 2015 was number 1 majority part of the decade. Deepika rised much later than Kat

Madhuri wasn't Nr.1 in 1995 anymore where she just had flops so she dominated 4 years. That's not the majority. Karishma and Kajol were much stronger in the second half.

Deepika rised later because Katrina was already having some good years in the second half of the 2000s. If anything you could say Kat dominated Bollywood from 2007-2012. But she declined too much after that. DP was easily superior from 2013-2015, the she had a break but came back strong with Padmavaat. Kat didn't have just a brief decline, until Tiger Zinda hai she didn't have a really successful movie for a few years (since Dhoom 3 which was more of a cameo role from her..she was literally there to dance. Compare that with Aish's role in dhoom 2). Remember even Bang Bang was a semi hit and that was followed by big flops until Salman saved her

Originally posted by: uroka

Madhuri is a legend

She had memorable roles in Hahk,devdas and dtph

She is decade defining Star

90s are remembered for madhuri

plz dont compare that firangi item girl with her

hahk as a film was iconic, but not her role. There is nothing as such special in that role. All she did was just playing herself and hip - shaking dances.

And devdas, again her role was mostly concerned with dances. And if u really want to chandramukhi go and see Vyjayanthimala's portrayal of chandramukhi. You will see the difference. Also, as far as tawaif roles are concerned, none of them are as iconic as Pakeezah and Umrao Jaan.

Lastly, for her acting, see her in hahk and dtph. You will see no difference because its not two characters, its only madhuri herself.

They will both be remembered for different reasons but not by me, that I can tell ya