Originally posted by: Silveraliax
How is arohi justified? I'm sorry but I fail to see the reasoning behind this.
From what I can ses, this is no normal marriage. Abhi has made oral clauses to their marriage. He will never love her and he has made it clear that this marriage is namesake only. The most she can get out of it is a title and his wealth. It is Arohi who has decided to ignore this and foolishly believe that she can create love in the future as if love grows on trees and she will pluck it once time is right.
It is like Arohi is a thief who wants to rob Abhi's house and the only fault of Abhi is that he has willingly laid out a red carpet for Arohi with a welcome sign to burgle. In my book, Arohi is more wrong here for stealing compared to Abhi who is only being reckless. The malice is with Arohi only.
I agree Aarohi is not justified for her zid of wanting Abhi. How is Abhi justified though? He promised Aarohi a loveless marriage, but still a marriage. He gave the dialogue of saath nibhana and all when he came to ask her hand for marriage. But then he's canoodling with the sister of his fiancée.
Same with Akshara, she is sacrificing her love for her sister, but she is all over her sister's fiance. She says once Aarohi is happily married, their relationship will get better. But how? Abhi is never gonna love Aarohi which Akshara knows. Aarohi will only blame Akshara for her failed marriage. For the samjadhaar ladki, this doesn't make sense?
Also, right now Abhi and Akshara both made a promise to Aarohi, and it feels like they are cheating behind Aarohi's back.
And if they want to do that, go ahead do it, but stop giving moral lectures and pretending like they are "morally right". Abhi shouldn't say TAMEEZ TAMEEZ anymore and Akshu should just stop her Aaru Jaap, when she is all over Aaru's fiance.
Edited by Ekahriz - 3 years ago