Some points in your post i agree, some i differ My 2 cents
Originally posted by: usernameyrkkh
Bapu ji's refusal to realise that he too is responsible for Anu's lack of education is a dead horse. Discussed enough.
But this man lectures the family a lot for someone who refuses to take any responsibility for his actions whatsoever.
- Blaming society for Vanraj's toxic masculinity. Well.. It's a father's job to teach his son a positive version of masculinity. His job to protect his kids from society teaching them evils. But alas! Let's blame the mother or society if the kid turns out bad. Typical.
- Calling Anu his daughter but doing the bare minimum. All the support he provides Anu is normal for a FIL in normal families. But does that make him a father? What kind of father emotionally manipulates his daughter into living with her abusive ex & gf-turned-wife? What kind of father never asks his sick daughter if she has taken her meds on time, or never offers her a glass of water?
- Sexualising Kavya. For all his chatter about treating DILs like daughters, gender equality, etc.. He was the quickest to sexualise Kavya's nighty. I still don't get what was so vulgar about it that he had to walk away. It was a very loose gown with a robe, down to her shin. He thought Kavya's ankles were vulgar? Again, typical. 70 years back my grandma also faced the same issue with her FIL. But now it's 2021. Pakhi walks around in shorts all day as a 17-18yo. Vanraj often roams the house in a ganji. So what's different? Status. Kavya's status as a female & a DIL.. Exposing Bapuji ka convenient feminism. Typical FIL signalling his wife to control the DIL's attire lengths.
Bapuji might be a good husband & grandpa, but he's a bad bad father. I hope his next lecture is about attaining some self awareness.
Bapuji seems to have totally overlooked Anupama's plea for pursuing her studies. Either he was too preoccupied making ends meet or thought that it was a matter handled by his mom and wife.
From Anupama's admission within a year of marriage she reached motherhood so the family might have conveniently forgotten the promise and definitely Hasmukh Shah is partly to blame.
Many times our thinking is shaped by the values we imbibe and not all values are instilled in us by our parents.As we get to experience the world of work we pick up new perspectives and drop old ones. Vanraj definitely has a nature that seems uniquely his making and i dont think we can hold his parents entirely responsible for it.
Baa is blinded by her love for her son but Baapuji has never supported him and has only been in favour of Anupama and asked Vanraj to leave the house after the EMA was known.
Baapuji does not have the power that Anuj has to instill fear in others who are nasty.He is assertive when need arises but at others he seems more a pacifist. I have lived in a joint family all my life both before and after marriage and what seems normal interaction in a nuclear family takes on a ew dimension when the needs of multiple generations have to be accommodated.(We were 4 generation of women in my parents place and there were 4 generations of men in my in laws place)
The value systems of each family is different though there are underlying matters that form the corner stone of any family.
Anupama derives her strength in being the caregiver. We saw her helping an old woman and ensuring Anuj ate the theplas she carried.She may not have felt comfortable being served by Baapuji.
Some people are used to certain thing and walk away to avoid conflicts when uncomfortable. I think he walked away knowing Baa would create a scene and not because he was a priggish when he did that.
When Dolly was upset with Anupama he senses it and speaks, when Rakhees name board is thrown it is he who picks it and offers to fix if they defaulted. With Samar he has such a wonderful bond. Maybe he is a person who feels for the underdog ...maybe he was one himself....he is not demonic as you have made him out to be .
He is a good soul and maybe it is unfortunate he has a son like Vanraj.