Alia Bhatt's New Bridal Wear Ad Sparks Controversy - Page 27

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

Tapori...matlab sadak chhaap gunda....😆

Gundi bhi toh ho sakti hai 😆

Lol..if nothing, the admakers really got what they wanted. Buzz buzz and more buzz. Both over twitter & IF. 😆

This thread is still open!

Did you expect this topic to be such a hit?! 😂

Originally posted by: TheMinion

This thread is still open!

Did you expect this topic to be such a hit?! 😂

no

Now I have to read some many pages to not feel left out

Edit: just realized it was a question to op 😆

Originally posted by: MaalGang

no

Now I have to read some many pages to not feel left out

Edit: just realized it was a question to op 😆

I was getting my sword ready when I saw a Deepu fan quoting me 😂

But after reading the post...

Keeping the whole topic aside, "Kanyamaan" sounds stupid.

What is even that supposed to mean?

Originally posted by: TheMinion

This thread is still open!

Did you expect this topic to be such a hit?! 😂

Not at all but it feels good😆

Originally posted by: altgr

Not at all but it feels good😆

Originally posted by: AwaamKiJaan

Keeping the whole topic aside, "Kanyamaan" sounds stupid.

What is even that supposed to mean?

Not anymore than ‘Kanyadaan’ which not just sounds stupid but also offensive!

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17_

lmao, your understanding of biblical studies is extremely poor, and I only have a passing interest in the subject, but the general consensus among biblical scholars (secular and christian alike) is that the gospels were not written by the people whom they're named after. They were written by anonymous authors several decades after the death of Jesus, gospel of John being the latest one.

Mary Magdalene was not a prostitute, there is no reference in the new testament that says she was one, so that goes out the window.

The only thing you've proven is that you don't have a clue what you're talking about. 😆

Dear God! What you're claiming is the same as saying Vyasa didn't write Mahabharata. 😆Technically, he didn't, because the written form appeared during the Gupta period.

Re: Mary Magdalene. There are opinions about it. But the silliness of what you said is clear. She was one of the few to be brave enough to remain by Jesus's side while he was being crucified. The rest ran away. Prostitute or not, she was a major part of the group. There is also a gospel by her. But of course, you want to conveniently miss that part😆Because it would refute your claim Jesus didn't disregard silly laws. He did, verbally and in his actions.

First you attempt to camouflage quotes from old Testament as Jesus quotes.

Then you attempt to claim Jesus never verbally refuted those laws.

When proven wrong on both counts, you try insults.😆