Originally posted by: d.padmini
I want raghav to ask pallavi
1. Where were her values and morals when BWA took keerti's pics and posted in internet, due to which amma , keerti were humiliated and landed in jail?
Pallavi didn't know about that because Raghav punished Pallavi for it without telling her what he thought she did. Pallavi probably saw the graffiti on Jaya's house when she stayed there, but if she asked Kirti what that was about, Kirti wouldn't have been able to name Sulochana. Only after Raghav tried to drive Pallavi out of Hyderabad while her father was in the ICU, put her brother in jail, forced her to marry him, denied her the key to her shop, threatened to take off his towel in front of her, and threw neem leaves at her and told her to grind them into paste while she was feverish ... after Raghav got Sulochana's confession without a word to Pallavi, he had a panic attack and then told Pallavi that he had wronged her. I don't think Raghav said anything to Pallavi about what happened to Kirti, and when Raghav alone went to the Deshmukhs to play Sulochana's confession video, all they heard her say was, "I implicated Jaya and Kirti" - not a word about undressed or photos or internet or jail. Then Raghav went and told Pallavi that he had thought about arresting Sulochana, but he had decided to leave her punishment to her family. So, it was Raghav alone who had proof and he on his own let Sulochana go, apparently without asking Kirti what she thought.
2. Where were her values and morals when BWA stole necklace from showroom and blamed raghav?
Pallavi asked Raghav a question: can we not arrest Sulochana Kākū because that would disgrace Milind Kākā? Pallavi never insisted; instead, she admitted to Raghav that she was wrong. By then, Raghav had convinced himself not to arrest Sulochana, so he left Pallavi out of his plan and put a gun to Sulochana's head.
3. Where are her morals and values when aai shielded her criminal son, projected image of marayada puroshotham ram in front of pallavi's eyes for 2 years..?
Pallavi should absolutely be upset that Sharada never spoke up about a murder. On what do you base your claim that Sharada projected a positive image of Mandar for Pallavi? I can't recall Sharada ever saying a word about Mandar to Pallavi, good or bad, while he was presumed dead. Again, not telling his crime was absolutely wrong.
4. Where were her moral and values when baba continued to support his criminal son, cursed raghav and Pallavi...?
When someone lashes out in grief, confrontation doesn't help. Maybe Pallavi hopes that Vijay will see his mistake if she is kind to him.
5. Where were her moral and principles when she tried to covered up Amrutha's pregnancy?
Pregnancy and abortion are personal choices, and nobody's business to know. Sulochana was wrong to defame Pallavi, and Amruta was wrong to allow it. Pallavi was not wrong to tell Raghav to keep quiet about who had the abortion. Of course, with Raghav having already said the word abortion in front of Rahul and Asha, whatever Pallavi wanted was moot.
6. Why she didn't let nikhil rot in jail , when she knew he was doing some illegal stuff..
Pallavi said to the Inspector at the time, you know that this is a smuggling racket (yes, she used those exact words), so you should go after Raghav Rao who directs and benefits from the crimes. It is not justice to punish only the person who carries out the criminal order. I will also point out that "rot in jail" - or specifically the starvation and dehydration that the Inspector ordered for Nikhil, is cruel and unusual punishment that any law-minded person should abhor.
Today she said she is ashamed that society will call her criminal's wife , why she didn't care about Raghav's image when she was staying with her ex and what society would have thought when she missed her husband's award function.. wasn't his image and brand at stake then .??
You're saying, Pallavi's one-time tardiness should be as shameful to her as Raghav's pattern of crimes? Or, living apart from one's husband and in proximity to an ex is as shameful as crime? No, it isn't.