@bold: Not really because she's upset with him. What else do you do in a relationship when someone does something wrong in your eyes, betrays your trust? Do you just sit there and act like everything is normal? Do we go back to being physically affectionate? No. Most people don't. Most people need time to get over things. This isn't a normal fight and although Raghav had no physical, direct hand in A's death, he had a hand in it nonetheless. Why is the onus on her to baby his feelings when he purposely lied to her?
I get your concern, but that's not fair to place that burden on P. She's already going to be careful with him I'm sure, but its not fair for her to sideline her feelings just because he's too emotionally unstable to take it. These are two adults in a relationship. He needs to go to therapy if he can't handle her taking her time to get over things.
Also if being emotionally distant means emotional blackmail, then what Raghav did to her post K elopement was also emotional blackmail. If we go by that idea, then a large part of maintaining any relationship involves emotional blackmail/manipulation. We can't call out Pallavi and not call out Raghav for doing the same (altho not sure if you did - I'm not a MF frequenter anymore). And in that situation, he was 100% wrong at being mad at her. And if they're both doing that - well that's just part of their relationship. Not every relationship is perfect.
And if the answer is she should leave him if she can't handle his ways - well relationships, especially marriages where you love your partner, don't break that easily. They first have to see if they can come to a compromise or an understanding. Clearly they already discussed this - and Raghav himself promised he would stop.
If we were talking about any personality characteristic, then yes, your sentiments on his reservations I would agree with. While I think you should be with someone who helps you become a better person - I don't think you should start a relationship thinking "I'm going to change him".
P's emotional distance will be brought upon by the fact that he lied to her, repeatedly, until he was backed into a corner and had no choice but to admit it (i.e. today's precap seems like she overheard everything - i mean seriously, why don't these people use doors? LOL). I don't think its so much of a "Raghav you're a criminal, i don't want to talk to you". It will be more of "how could you lie to me after you promised me you wouldn't do it. i can't talk to you right now. how could you justify your business ways now that someone died" type of blow up.
Why can she not be emotionally upset and distant when he betrayed her trust in him? If the promise didn't exist, then I would've been saying other things, but the fact is it does and he agreed to it.
Also, why is Raghav doing illegal things "part of who he is"... like, it's just a means to an end for him, it doesn't define who he is. His personality and identity defines who he is. And his identity is not just limited to his business & his don status, especially not now, not anymore. And further, even his business and don identity does not need to be tied to illegal activities. It's not like he goes around to defy all the laws. As we grow up, as our lives changes, our identities can evolve, too. He does not need to be stuck in the same identity, the same Raghav as a year ago.
Maybe you are right. I am getting super confused with all the back and forth in the forum for the past few days. My head for the matter is spinning now. 😆
Anyways what does it matter. I am not watching it anyways now. 🤣