Originally posted by: 404_NotFound
Since my post was quoted I am giving an explanation otherwise I wouldn’t because I know how much we appreciate different perceptive here .
I feel the whole situation could have been handled in a better way . As audiences we know what made Sai jump her guns on Pakhi as she had observed something but does Virat know what made Sai refuse the gift suddenly ? For him the gift was from Samrat and Pakhi . We know Samrat matters to him a lot . If we keep our likes and dislikes for character aside then if someone starts the conversation rudely without giving any reasons as to why they are behaving so then we blame the person who is being rude for no reason . That’s how Virat saw . He saw Samrakhi were giving gift to Sai like they did for the entire family but Sai rudely refused without a proper reason . He felt Sai was unnecessarily creating drama . I can’t blame Virat for feeling so . Due to suppressed anger because of his transfer issue he indirectly taunted Sai . Sai could have responded to the taunt but she included Virat in Pakhi’s misdeed and called him double face . She blamed Virat for Pakhi’s fake move on drama. Virat had no role in that and double faced made no sense here . If she had called him out for taunting her then I wouldn’t have said she started the fight .
I would like to highlight that I also said Virat shouldn’t have shown his suppressed anger infront of Pakhi. His anger was justified IMO but not infront of Pakhi similarly Sai has rights to refuse but calling Virat as double faced could have been avoided . It diverted the whole fight into something else .
I don’t think I need to say why Pakhi was wrong here
How many times u had been reminded that if u have to participate in this forum u have to sing praises for sai & bash virat & pakhi .
U don't know world all eligible bachelor's r dying to marry sai .
## mera time aa gaya popular hone ka😎🥳