SAAKK CCC #36 - Page 25

Originally posted by: lavs_157

I don’t see the show, only the clips here and there. So I am glad if she made him pay for it. But still she lost her family(not that they are worth it), and i don’t know what’s the redemption for it and calling her his mistress. 🤷‍♀️

I didn’t know usney gala pakda. 😳😳

His redemption track is proper ..he has literally got too many slaps from Pallavi,her family and mother and Raghav has made many efforts to reunite Pallavi with her family at the cost of his self respect

Originally posted by: mallukumari

I totally agree! A lot of societal taboos are dumb. This being one of them that divorce is the end and a woman without a man is somehow unfulfilled. She should finish her education and find financial independence and move out of Ahir’s house. I’m curious to know what Ahir’s place will look like in Mumbai!

True!! Divorce is not the end. It needs to stop being made into a stigma.

Originally posted by: Snusmit

Men on itv all of them every single one is problematic. That reflects on the society and the channel more than the makers. It indicates what people want to see and that really shows what people think. Unless there is a societal change shows can't be socially correct and flourish. Examples are Saakk and aapki nazron mein . Saakk intially called out Shaurya a lot more. They are doing what they are doing to survive. Art can happen only when it is economically feasible. U cant criticize someone for trying to run their house over selecting proper messaging. Secondly I think Shaurya has always been called out. Only quantitatively the calling out should have been way more stronger. Aapki nazron mein is such a unique show. I don't watch it but disabled people never get shown on tv. What's the outcome-struggling with trp. If one can't endorse progressive content then one can't question makers on problematic messaging.

Y’know I totally agree. It’s the Balaji formula that works. EK has such regressive content on tv because that’s what sells. She has much more progressive content on her ott platform and movies. It might seem like chicken or egg thing but I think the public has to stop lapping up this crap before makers are able to enact change.

As for Shaurya, he is a product of the patriarchy just like Anokhi is. They tried the reform him route but at the end of the day, ShaKhi had a sindoor shaadi. And Anokhi walks around with sindoor as if she’s married. That is also a very old school thought that satisfies the trp audience.
As for ANNS, it started okay, but the shaadi really ruined the male lead and his redemption has been unsatisfactory to me. But you’re right that disabilities aren’t portrayed well on ITV.

In ITV, TRP rules. There’s no way out of that until the system and audience demand change.

https://twitter.com/rarchana24/status/1405844158183579654?s=20

Originally posted by: Snusmit

I haven't seen the show. I felt the origin was good. But the same must have happened. They relented to what they felt help raise trps. I think what such shows require is channel faith. And honestly one or two shows not getting grt trps would shake star. Star still is placed highest on the trp list. If it takes risks it will still be at the top. I don't want to comment on others as I don't watch. But I felt tv is going back in time. I watched dil mil gaye, pyar ki ek kahani and mile jab hum Tum. Which were far far better than what is on itv today. They had long runs. I am sure they must have had issues too but not to this scale I am sure. They had grt humor. They were light and uplifting. They really had stuff to show. Now well .......

For now I find SAAKK much better than other shows. Maybe I am biased, but still I find it real and relatable than other shows. I have NOT been a huge fan of itv though. This is my first show in 10 years.

Originally posted by: lavs_157

True!! Divorce is not the end. It needs to stop being made into a stigma.

In ITV, being a widow is more accepted than divorce. I’m glad it’s kind of changing with shows like Anupama. But that show still makes the other woman the villain rather than the husband who cheated.

Originally posted by: asmitag

His redemption track is proper ..he has literally got too many slaps from Pallavi,her family and mother and Raghav has made many efforts to reunite Pallavi with his family at the cost of his self respect

Okay! Maybe that’s enough. But I personally can’t get over what he did. Though I really like Raghav!

Karan asked for a song and someone posted this

https://twitter.com/Uroojs124/status/1405946907860606977?s=20

Originally posted by: mallukumari

In ITV, being a widow is more accepted than divorce. I’m glad it’s kind of changing with shows like Anupama. But that show still makes the other woman the villain rather than the husband who cheated.

Exactly! I was impressed with the premise of Anupama until they went on to make kavya this clingy needy insecure gf who ultimately became the villain now. Whereas the actual culprit is Vanraj. He is a horrible excuse of a human/man!

Originally posted by: mallukumari

In ITV, being a widow is more accepted than divorce. I’m glad it’s kind of changing with shows like Anupama. But that show still makes the other woman the villain rather than the husband who cheated.

Isse bada sach kisine nhi bola. So damn true!!!!!

Correct me if I am wrong women who are educated and drink are shown as vamps a lot more not to mention if women are rich.