Originally posted by: AwaamKiJaan
I am none of those crazies you mentioned, and neither I devalued any "said opinion".š
My opinion was on people who defend nepotism. Not the concept of nepotism itself.
Those crazies are not what I mentionedā¦those are the categories mentioned in your original post about the only ātypeā of ppl who defend nepotismā¦fanatics, paid or personally offended.
Itās a convenient way to categorise people who have an opposing view because in all 3 cases, there is a personal involvement without objectivity and the opinion can be easily dismissed as bias ā¦š
And yes itās evident ur view is on the people who defend nepotism and not nepotism itself
But since Iām a pro at not accepting an opposing view, Iām wondering what the above approach is of categorising people with an opposing view ā¦pro ++ I guess? š


0